I'm wondering if *anyone* is actually working on the GUI :p ... The suggestions from *this* list is to use something like OpenNebula or other third party project to manage KVM . . .
-- James Pulver Information Technology Area Supervisor LEPP Computer Group Cornell University -----Original Message----- From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Chris Tooley Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:36 PM To: Nico Kadel-Garcia Cc: Matej HALAC; scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov Subject: Re: KVM virtualized Windows x64 machines crash On 11-08-03 9:14 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Matej HALAC<m.ha...@cpce.net> wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 10:41 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Matej HALAC<m.ha...@cpce.net> wrote: > >>>> Also host servers get this message in the logs: >>>> kernel: kvm: 2323: cpu0 unimplemented perfctr wrmsr: 0xc1 data >>>> 0xabcd >>>> >>>> I myself have a ML150 G6 with Intel Xeon E5504 that runs SL6 and libvirt >>>> with a Windows server without a hitch. >>>> >>>> Any advice is appreciated since I tried looking for the solution and >>>> nothing helped me. >>> >>> You get this on both servers? If you can spare the time, test one of >>> the other virtualization technologies. >> >> Yes these messages are present on both machines and also the Windows >> image crashes on both as well. The specific machine worked without >> problems on my ML150 so I doubt it's a problem with the Guest image. > > I'm afraid this is a level of problem where buying a server license > from our favorite upstream vendor would help get you access to the > technical support of the people who are actually writing it. And I'm > afraid I'm not personally very happy with KVM based virtualization. If > the GUI is that bad, it makes me concerned about the quality of the > rest of the backend. To be fair, it's likely that the backend guys are not doing the GUI. -Chris
