On 03/01/2012 03:12 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: > On 03/01/2012 04:34 AM, g wrote: >> during recent update, yumex returned error; >> >> "Error checking package signatures: >> Package jdk-1.6.0_31-fcs.i586.rpm is not signed" >> >> update completed via "yum --nogpgcheck update". >> > > We are unable to sign the jdk packages, and have not done so > historically. The package provider will now allow modification to the > package file. Private attempts to sign the rpm have resulted in > packages which cannot be installed. -=-
interesting. > The jdk package is the only package in SL which should not be signed. -=- even more interesting. this is first time that i have had signature problem. -- peace out. tc.hago, g . *please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted* **** in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better. So I installed Linux. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ ****
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature