""" In that case, why should Scientific Linux bother with any of this git stuff? All the SL maintainers need is one (1) Red Hat customer, anywhere on the planet, to obtain the source DVDs and give them a copy. Then they can build just like they always have... """
If they're not released to the public, they are almost guaranteed to be encumbered in a manner similar to the binary RPMs, which would make that illegal. I haven't looked for changes to the EULA with RHEL7 yet, but I would imagine they took care of it. On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Patrick J. LoPresti <lopre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Akemi Yagi <amy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Just wanted to make a short note to say that source DVDs are available > > to RH customers. > > > > In that case, why should Scientific Linux bother with any of this git > stuff? All the SL maintainers need is one (1) Red Hat customer, > anywhere on the planet, to obtain the source DVDs and give them a > copy. Then they can build just like they always have... > -- Thanks, Jamie Duncan @jamieeduncan
