[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please take action and pass this on.  Word about this critical story must
get out there!




>                                  FAIR-L
>                     Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
>                Media analysis, critiques and activism
>
> http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2520
>
> ACTION ALERT:
> Network Viewers Still in the Dark on "Smoking Gun Memo"
> Print media continue to downplay story
>
> May 20, 2005
>
> Following FAIR's call for more mainstream coverage of the "smoking gun
memo"--the secret British document containing new evidence that the Bush
administration manipulated intelligence to justify its plan to invade
Iraq--a steady trickle of news reports have appeared. But that coverage has
been downplayed in general and is still completely absent from the nightly
news.
>
> The Los Angeles Times published a page 3 story on the memo on May 12, and
the Washington Post ran a page 18 story the following day. More than two
weeks after the story broke in the Sunday Times of London (5/1/05), it
finally made the front page of a major U.S. newspaper, the Chicago Tribune
(5/17/05).
>
> After referring to the memo (5/2/05) in a story on the British electoral
campaign, the New York Times failed to report on the document's implications
about the Bush administration until today (5/20/05); the one-column story
didn't mention the manipulation of intelligence until the eighth paragraph.
(Times columnist Paul Krugman also discussed the memo on the paper's opinion
page on May 16.)
>
> The Washington Post's ombudsman, Michael Getler, who the previous week
(5/8/05) had mentioned reader complaints about the Post's lack of memo
coverage without evaluating their substance, revisited the issue with a much
more critical eye in his most recent column (5/15/05). (The ombud gave
back-handed credit to FAIR and the group Media Matters for America--both
"self-described media watchdog organizations"--for prompting him to delve
into the story.) Getler wrote that Post editors initially told him they
didn't pursue the story because they were "tied up with election
coverage"--this despite the fact that the leaked memo became a major
election story in Britain and likely contributed to Tony Blair's weak
returns. When he questioned them again after the email campaign, Getler
wrote, "editors agreed that this story should be covered and said they were
going to go back and do that"; the Post's May 13 story followed.
>
> Getler called investigation of the memo's conclusions "journalistically
mandatory" and suggested that the Post story should have been placed on the
front page.
>
> While the memo has begun to get wider coverage in print, broadcasters have
maintained a near silence on the issue. The story has turned up in a few
short CNN segments (Crossfire, 5/13/05; Live Sunday, 5/15/05; Wolf Blitzer
Reports, 5/16/05), but the only mention of the memo FAIR found on the major
broadcast networks came on ABC's Sunday morning show This Week (5/15/05), in
which host George Stephanopoulos questioned Sen. John McCain about its
contents. When McCain declared that he didn't "agree with it" and defended
the Bush administration's decision to go to war, Stephanopoulos didn't
question him further. A look at the nightly news reveals not a single story
aired about the memo and its implications.
>
> When finally questioned by CNN (5/16/05), White House press secretary
Scott McClellan claimed he hadn't seen the memo, but that "the reports"
about it were "flat-out wrong." British government officials, however, did
not dispute the contents of the memo--which can be read in full online at
http://downingstreetmemo.com/ --and a former senior American official called
it "an absolutely accurate description of what transpired" (Knight Ridder,
5/6/05).
>
> The Chicago Tribune (5/17/05) named several factors that had caused a
"less than robust discussion" of the smoking gun memo: Aside from the White
House's denials, and the media's slow reaction, the paper asserted that "the
public generally seems indifferent to the issue or unwilling to rehash the
bitter prewar debate over the reasons for the war." Of course, it's hard to
judge the public's interest in a story the media have largely shielded them
from.
>
> ACTION:
> Please contact the nightly news programs and ask them to investigate and
report on the new evidence that the Bush administration manipulated
intelligence to support its plan to invade Iraq.
>
> CONTACT:
> ABC World News Tonight
> Phone: 212-456-4040
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> CBS Evening News
> Phone: 212-975-3691
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> NBC Nightly News
> Phone: 212-664-4971
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> PBS NewsHour with Jim Lehrer
> Phone: 703-739-5000
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> As always, please remember that your comments have more impact if you
maintain a polite tone.
>       ----------
> Your donation to FAIR makes a difference:
> http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=103
>
> SUBSCRIBE TO EXTRA! AND GET FAIR'S NEW BOOK FOR FREE:
> The Oh Really? Factor
> http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=114
>
> FAIR SHIRTS: Get your "Don't Trust the Corporate Media" shirt today at
FAIR's online store:
> http://www.merchantamerica.com/fair/
>
> FAIR produces CounterSpin, a weekly radio show heard on over 130 stations
in the U.S. and Canada. To find the CounterSpin station nearest you, visit
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=5
>
> Feel free to respond to FAIR ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). We can't reply to
everything, but we will look at each message. We especially appreciate
documented examples of media bias or censorship. And please send copies of
your email correspondence with media outlets, including any responses, to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
>
> You can subscribe to FAIR-L at our web site: http://www.fair.org . Our
subscriber list is kept confidential.
>                                   FAIR
>                              (212) 633-6700
>                           http://www.fair.org/
>                           E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to fair-l as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> NOTE: To change your address, simply unsubscribe your old address, and
re-subscribe with your new address.
>




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/pkgkPB/SOnJAA/Zx0JAA/LRMolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to