i feel that for "Lost" I lost interest and quite watching last year because I couldn't take it when they said the slowly-unfolding-mystery would go until 2010! That's just stretching out a myster that frankly should have been told in three years. But I don't see that with "Heroes", it was pretty tight in the first season
-------------- Original message -------------- From: "g123curious" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Why do I like New Amsterdam better than both Lost and Heroes? Frankly, both Lost and Heroes remind me of the daily soaps: General Hospital, As The World Turns, etc. Nothing ever really gets resolved. It's like one long fake-out to me. And to keep viewers interested, the plots get ever more fantastical... unbelieveable. With Google Maps and Streetview, no downed airplane would ever be "lost" for so long. So, it isn't so much that New Amsterdam is so great. Rather, the others are so boring. So much on TV these days is so boring... like all of the reality TV shows are so boring and repetitive... I watch less and less TV and blog more. George --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Wow, while I've lost interest in "Lost" (can't put more time into this mystery show that has frequent repeats, half-seasons, and dragging waaay too many seasons), I like "Heroes" a great deal. I haven't seen anything in "New Amsterdam" to make it better than "Heroes" when the latter's at its best. They're very different shows, too. Why do you like it so much better? > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
