I really disliked BET for a long time, because they pretty much wasted the
opportunity to create an incredible conduit for all types of black
entertainment. (a couple of exceptions but not many) Compare it to Telemundo
that has several long running shows and award winning news programming. BET
could have gone with a similar business model with their own unique
programming but we ended up with mostly fluff and garbage.

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Keith Johnson <keithbjohn...@comcast.net>wrote:

>
>
> The only thing BET had going for it back in the day were a few talk and
> news shows. There was the news show BET tonight (with, at various times, Ed
> Gordon and Tavis Smiley). There was a talk show with the great Bev
> Smith--who, curiously, was the *only* dark-skinned person hosting a major
> show in BET for quite a long time. Bev is good, no nonsense, and well
> informed, and her show reflected her abilities. There was a  good show aimed
> at teens that aired on Saturdays (I think it was called Teen Beat). Before
> the gangtsa rap thing really hit, it had a feeling that now I guess we'd
> call "innocent", dealing with real issues like divorce, drugs, school
> quality, along with having guests who'd come in and talk to the kids. There
> was music, videos, and dancing, but like I said, it didn't have the harder,
> more carnal edge that even shows aimed at young adults can have nowadays.
> Finally, there was a good news talk show hosted by Ed Gordon that had a
> panel including George Curry and Clarence Page. Good, informed discussions.
> I forget the name of the show.   But curiously, BET chose to air both it and
> Bev Smith's show on Sundays before noon--when most black folk were at church
> or brunch!
> There was even an enjoyable entertainment themed show where Tanya Hart
> interviewed various celebrity guests. Last I saw, I think Ms. Hart does some
> kind of gossip stuff, as I see her show up on TMZ-like shows dishing on
> who's sleeping with whom in Hollywood.
>
> But yeah, back then BET had enough shows like the above so that I watched
> it a least a few hours a week.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Baxter" <truthseeker...@lycos.com>
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 5:41:35 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] The CW: Ain't No Beautiful Black People
>
>
>
>   Personally, Michelle, I never got deep enough into BET to judge
> programming or camera angles or any such. Their systematic mistreatment of
> women was, to me, nauseating.
>
>
>
>
> ---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------
> *Subject : *Re: [RE][scifinoir2] The CW: Ain't No Beautiful Black People
> *Date : *Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:58:06 -0000
> *From : *"Michelle Lauren" <miche...@michellelaurenbooks.com>
> *To : *scifino...@yahoogroups.com
>
> I haven't watched BET except in passing for years. It always seemed to me
> as if the company that owned BET, Viacom (which also owns MTV) wasn't
> putting as much effort into the look and quality of BET as they were putting
> into MTV's programming.
>
> In recent years, I've felt as if BET was just airing bad remakes of shows
> premiered on MTV. For instance, Baldwin Hills on BET was aired after MTV's
> the Hills, but B.H. felt like something the network just threw together. I
> also have a problem with a lot of the camera quality on BET as opposed to
> stations such as MTV and NBC, where the viewing quality is clear instead of
> grainy as it often is on BET.
>
> The CW just plain irritates me. When they were the WB and UPN as separate
> entities, both stations tended to randomly cancel good shows (such as Angel
> the Series, from Joss Whedon). And their limited programming that showed
> actors and actresses of color was also irritating to me.
>
> Michelle Lauren
> STARSTRUCK: HUNTER sci-fi-romance)available from Liquid Silver Books!
> http://www.michellelaurenbooks.com
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/michellelaurenbooks/join
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQdwk8Yntds
>
>
> 
>



-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/

Reply via email to