Amen, amen! All you hear is studios worried about demographics (hence, a 
forgettable run by Halle Berry as Storm, when everyone knows Angela Bassett 
would have nailed the role) instead of quality. And i have long been puzzled 
and irritated by the thing you mentioned, where sex and violence in appalling 
or appallingly impersonal measure gets approved -some scenes in "Crank" or the 
Eli Roth "torture porn" films come to mind. Yet intimate sexual scenes that 
might show some genetalia in a tasteful and even understanding manner get 
labeled NC-17. Even on Syfy early this morning (3 am) I saw the beginning of 
some ghost/slasher flick with Casper van Diem and perennial tough guy actor 
Michael Rooker. The bad guy impaled, slashed, and cut up three people in teh 
first five minutes. Blood splaying everywhere, body parts dropping. Yet it's on 
TV! In the theatres, that's an R and kids get in all the time. 
Yet let there be ten *seconds* of an intimate love scene between a married 
couple in a film, and the thing's verbote, advisories go out all over the 
place, and conservatives are decrying the fall of Western civilization. And now 
with "The Hangover", the teen-sex thing will be back, with copious and 
gratuitous nude scenes, and no one will care. 
Crazy... 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mr. Worf" <hellomahog...@gmail.com> 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2009 4:22:50 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] We're Drawing Closer to a Will Smith/Zoe Saldana 
'Harvey' 






I think that is where the studio's influences come into play when they are 
viewing the rushes. Some of the films that I have watched that have that part 
of their development documented on video often have changes made to the film 
that delete key parts of the movie that may have taken into a deeper direction. 

Another thing that bugs me is that the MPAA will often approve gore and sex 
scenes in movies if there isn't a happy ending with the characters, or an 
unhealthy relationship, but if there is a healthy sexual relationship that 
often ends up on the cutting room floor. 


On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Keith Johnson < keithbjohn...@comcast.net > 
wrote: 






It takes parents to start teaching their kids to appreciate quality. it takes 
friends to take friends to see something they'd not otherwise see. It takes 
couples doing something like taking one night a week, or one week a month, 
where they see something they'd not otherwise see, whether that's watching a 
silent flick on Turner Classics, an original version of something they've only 
seen in remakes (such as The Day the Earth Stood still), or brazing the 
theatres to see a foreign film with subtitles. 

What I find most interesting is that, while America churns out a lot of low 
brow crap that's too focused on CGI, sex, and violence lacking in cleverness 
(not like a John Woo flick) the creators of such aren't always really idiots. 
Sure, we have the hacks like Michael Bay, who I contend is just an awful 
director. But we have a lot of directors who are always talking about good 
film, who in interviews speak of the influence of the masters like Bergman, 
Kurosawa. in the animation world, for example, you'd be hard pressed to find a 
single person at Disney, Pixar, or Dreamworks who doesn't worship the work of 
Miyazaki. Even when they're putting out easy fare like Madagascar or Shrek 3, 
they still know quality when they see it. 

So, is the tail wagging the dog, or the other way 'round? 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mr. Worf" < hellomahog...@gmail.com > 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 



Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2009 1:35:51 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] We're Drawing Closer to a Will Smith/Zoe Saldana 
'Harvey' 






I agree, but I think that it may take a re-education on a national level. 


On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Keith Johnson < keithbjohn...@comcast.net > 
wrote: 






Actually there are a lot of good films out there that could teach people to 
appreciate plotting. The only problem is they don't get the press. Indie films, 
little theatre chains, IFC on cable, TCM for old classic movies--it's all 
there. What we need to do is teach people to seek out the fare that's out 
there.... 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mr. Worf" < hellomahog...@gmail.com > 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 



Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 2:04:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] We're Drawing Closer to a Will Smith/Zoe Saldana 
'Harvey' 









I think that there is a large part of the audience that doesn't look beyond the 
cgi. I think that they are trained to do that in this country. (The monster 
truck, indy500, wrestling set) Outside of that we have everyone else that 
doesn't mind a nice explosion but want a plot to tie the explosions together. 
The problem is that there just havent been enough films to really teach 
american audiences how to watch a film with a plot. 


On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:56 PM, < wlro...@aol.com > wrote: 






That is not a bad idea, but this generation is more interested in computer 
graphics then a real good story line. 
--Lavender 




From: Martin Baxter 
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 7:40 AM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 



Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] We're Drawing Closer to a Will Smith/Zoe Saldana 
'Harvey' 





        Whenever H'Wood remakes something, some moe-ronic person will say that 
it's being done "for this/the next generation" to appreciate. 

Why not sit the generation in question down and show them the *original*? Allow 
them to appreciate *it*? 






---------[ Received Mail Content ]---------- 
Subject : Re: [scifinoir2] We're Drawing Closer to a Will Smith/Zoe Saldana 
'Harvey' 
Date : Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:05:07 -0700 
>From : "Mr. Worf" < hellomahog...@gmail.com > 
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

You think that is bad? They are starting to make fairy tales over now. 
First there is Alice in Wonderland, and they just announced that DiCaprio is 
making Little red riding hood. Hmm I wonder which will be next? Pinocchio or 
the three little pigs? 

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Keith Johnson wrote: 

> 
> 
> i just don't see the point of remaking the movie, no matter who's in the 
> lead. Lord I wish H'wood could just leave some properties alone! 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "brent wodehouse" 
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 2:46:28 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
> Subject: [scifinoir2] We're Drawing Closer to a Will Smith/Zoe Saldana 
> 'Harvey' 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.movieline.com/2009/08/were-drawing-closer-to-a-will-smithzoe-saldana-harvey.php
>  
> 
> Predictions 
> 
> We're Drawing Closer to a Will Smith/Zoe Saldana Harvey 
> 
> Written by Kyle Buchanan | 05 Aug 2009 
> 
> Variety announced today that Tom Hanks has decided not to star in Steven 
> Spielberg’s remake of Harvey, avoiding exactly the kind of unwinnable and 
> unimaginative comparisons to Jimmy Stewart that we warned him against. So 
> what’s next for the project? We can guess! 
> 
> At this point, it seems utterly inevitable that Spielberg will tap Will 
> Smith to star - after all, the actor was in the mix when the project was 
> first announced, and his shooting schedule is completely clear in 2010. 
> Without pressing sequel commitments and with most of his star vehicles 
> still in development (including a Spielberg-helmed redo of Oldboy), Smith 
> would appear to have this one sewn up. 
> 
> And while we’re making predictions, here’s another: If Smith gets the nod, 
> expect Zoe Saldana to be cast as his skeptical sister. She’s worked with 
> Spielberg before on The Terminal, she’ll be coming off a stellar 2009, and 
> she’s got no projects set with a definite date next year (since the Star 
> Trek sequel is still in the planning stages). 
> 
> I’m still willing to be surprised, but methinks you don’t remake Harvey if 
> you’re intent on throwing audiences for a loop. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/ 



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQdwk8Yntds 

People may lie, but the evidence rarely does. 








-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/ 










-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/ 









-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/ 



Reply via email to