I'm not defending his behaviour, but I am criticizing the move to leave him out 
in the first place. I guess I must overlook or ignore Shatners's rants more 
than most, as his shenanigans have never pushed me to the point of being sick 
of him. I will absolutely admit he can be an egocentric, possessive jerk. 
That's evidenced by the fit he had after Nimoy's success directing "The Search 
for Spock", "The Voyage Home", and others. Shatner all but forced the studio to 
let hiim write and direct a flick, and what we got was inarguably the worst 
Trek film of them all "The Final Frontier". My money was very tight when that 
movie premiered , and I had to count quarters to get a ticket. Still want my 
money back.   



But that being said,  i still feel that Kirk is essential to the spirit of 
Trek. If not, we'd never have had a young Kirk in the new movie. Even with the  
inadvisable death of Kirk in "Generations" (which Shatner *never* should have 
agreed to!) there were ways to have Kirk in the movie, even as a flashback. 



As for ticket sales, you know my position there. It's a good movie, but it's 
not pure Trek in many ways. Lots of Star Wars fans and casual scifi fans who 
aren't as--intense-as people like me. Lots of fans who saw the movie and then 
forgot about it. So I don't doubt that the movie did well. Heck, it would ahve 
done well without Nimoy too, but that doesnt' mean I don't think it would have 
benefited from his appearance. 








----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tracey de Morsella" <tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com> 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:34:20 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] William Shatner set to be beamed up 

  







I like Shatner, but trying to force someone or embarrass them into doing 
something you want is not a good move, particularly when you have a reputation 
for needing to dominate on the set.  Trying the turn the public against the 
producers is not a great way to get hired.  



It may have been a bad move, but the ticket sales tell a different story.    I 
wanted him in, but after he did that, I felt if I were the producers, there 
would be no way I’d want him in the picture after that.  I would view him as 
unable to control or stay on message  when doing publicity.   I bet they 
planned to put him in the sequel to humble him a little after the stunts he 
pulled 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:21 AM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] William Shatner set to be beamed up 









I'll be succinct. 



One. It was a mistake not to include Shatner in a Trek movie. Unlike many who 
either don't like him, or see him as not essential to Treklore, I like Shatner 
fine. Star Trek was more about Shatner, I'd argue, in terms of the human quest 
for knowledge and enlightenment, than Spock, despite Spock's popularity. 
Really, they need each other, so to have one without the other? Bad move. 



Two. I wonder how they'll bring in Shatner in this new timeline? Makes me 
frustrated again at the whole alternate reality angle, which I fear I shall 
never fully embrace. 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "brent wodehouse" <brent_wodeho...@thefence.us> 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 2:09:21 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [scifinoir2] William Shatner set to be beamed up 

  




http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/film/2986590/William-Shatner-set-to-be-beamed-up
 

William Shatner set to be beamed up 

Last updated 13:32 21/10/2009 

Hollywood director JJ Abrams appears set to beam William Shatner up to the 
Star Trek sequel. 

Abrams suffered plenty of criticism from Star Trek fans when he opted not 
to cast Shatner, the original Captain James T Kirk of the USS Enterprise, 
in this year's big screen update of the iconic sci-fi film and TV series. 

Abrams did cast the original Spock, Leonard Nimoy. 

Star Trek was one of the most successful films of 2009, earning almost 
US$400 million (NZ$542.81m) at the worldwide box office, and with a sequel 
set for release in theatres in 2011, Abrams confirmed Shatner may be 
offered a role. 

"I would love to work with him," Abrams told reporters in Los Angeles at a 
press conference to promote the release of the Star Trek DVD. 

"We speak. We actually have a lunch date planned." 

Abrams opted to make Star Trek a prequel, winding the clock back to the 
early years of the Star Trek crew with young actors Chris Pine (Kirk), 
Zachary Quinto (Spock) and Simon Pegg (Montgomery Scott) filling the lead 
roles. 

While Abrams and screenwriters Bob Orci and Alex Kurtzman managed to find 
a way to bring Nimoy back, they opted against offering Shatner a role. 

The dilemma they faced is examined in The Shatner Conundrum, one of the 
extra features on the Star Trek DVD. 

"It was a foregone conclusion we wanted him in the movie," Abrams 
explained. 

"The problem was his character died on screen in one of his Trek films and 
because we decided, very early on, that we wanted to adhere to Trek canon 
as best we could ... the required machinations to get Shatner into the 
movie would have been very difficult to do given the story we wanted to 
tell and also to give him the kind of part that he would be happy with. 

"It was this thing where it would have felt like a gimmick in order to get 
Shatner in the movie, which would have honestly, to me, been distracting." 

The success of Abrams' Star Trek and the welcome Pine, Quinto, Pegg and 
other new actors received from Trekkies will make it easier to introduce 
Shatner into the sequel, Abrams said. 

"In terms of moving forward, I am open to anything," Abrams added. 

"I feel like the first movie did some of the heavy lifting that needed to 
be done in order to free us to continue going forward. Maybe there's less 
of a burden and there's going to be more opportunity to work with him 
(Shatner)." 

The Star Trek DVD, set for release in Australia on October 29, is filled 
with extras, including gag reels, three hours of bonus footage, 
commentary, secrets behind th e costumes and sets and deleted scenes that 
reveal a side story involving Eric Bana's villainous character Nero. 

The DVD also includes what is billed as "ground-breaking augmented reality 
technology" which, through a webcam, allows a 3D holographic tour of the 
Enterprise. 

Abrams said the decision to hold the world premiere for Star Trek at the 
Sydney Opera House in April was the perfect launch pad for the movie. 

"I have been to Sydney before and I loved it the first time," Abrams told 
AAP in a video interview. 

"This last time it was so surreal. First of all I had never been to the 
Opera House which could not have been more beautiful. 

"The reception was off the charts. The people were so kind. It was 
beautiful, maybe not atypical Sydney weather, but I called my wife and 
said 'We might have to move here'. 

"I am serious. I want to go back not just for professional reasons. I just 
want to go back because it is f antastic." 










Reply via email to