ahar...@earthlink.net

  Subject: [scifinoir2] RE: George Washington became a abolitionist (in closet)


  I second these emotions!
  Peace,
  Amy


  Thanks for doing  the research.  Good stuff 

   

  Tracey de Morsella, Managing Producer

  The Green Economy Post

  http://greeneconomypost.com

  tra...@greeneconomypost.com

  Phone: 425-502-7716

   

  From: Albert Fields [mailto:cbilmarket...@yahoo.com] 
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 8:16 PM
  To: tdemorse...@multiculturaladvantage.com; kalpub...@aol.com; 
scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com; dar...@darylelockhart.com; afrikanm...@hotmail.com; 
bettil...@msn.com; cinque3...@verizon.net; dorothyh...@sbcglobal.net; 
duva...@hotmail.com; fis...@bellsouth.net; gwashin...@aol.com; 
jeffreypbal...@gmail.com; killa...@gmail.com; keithbjohn...@comcast.net; 
imke...@gmail.com; seriousnup...@yahoo.com; logic1...@aol.com; 
truthseeker...@icqmail.com; mmb1...@gmail.com; gord...@indiana.edu; 
michael.v.w.gor...@gmail.com; ravena...@yahoo.com; rs...@yahoo.com; 
everything...@nyc.rr.com; valeryjea...@yahoo.com; wendellsmit...@gmail.com; 
sonofafieldne...@sbcglobal.net; williamsf...@speakeasy.net; beta...@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: George Washington became a abolitionist (in closet)

   

  All you did was get me searching.

   

   

  Here is something else on washington and slavery.

   

  Washington and slavery
  Historians' perceptions of Washington's stand on slavery tend to be mixed.[7] 
Although Washington never made any public statement about slavery or the 
treatment of slaves, it is clear that as he progressed in life, he became 
increasingly uneasy with the "peculiar institution," and historian Roger Bruns 
wrote: "As he grew older, he became increasingly aware that it was immoral and 
unjust." 

  According to historians such as Clayborne Carson and Gary Nash, Washington's 
professed hatred of slavery was offset by his denial of freedom to even those 
slaves, like William "Billy" Lee, who fought with Washington for eight years. 
Lee lived at Mount Vernon as a slave, although his wife was a free woman from 
Philadelphia, named Margaret Thomas. Although some historians claim that it is 
not known whether she lived with him on the plantation,[8] most sources 
indicate that she did not.[9] Billy Lee was the only slave freed outright in 
Washington's will. 

  After the revolution, Washington told an English visitor, "I clearly foresee 
that nothing but the rooting out of slavery can perpetuate the existence of our 
[Federal] union by consolidating it on a common bond of principle." The buying 
and selling of slaves, as if they were "cattle in the market," especially 
outraged him. He wrote to his friend John Francis Mercer in 1786, "I never mean 
… to possess another slave by purchase; it being among my first wishes to see 
some plan adopted, by which slavery in this country may be abolished by slow, 
sure, and imperceptible degrees." [10] Ten years later he wrote to Robert 
Morris: "There is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do to see 
some plan adopted for the abolition [of slavery]</ref>."[11] 

   

  As president, Washington was mindful of the risk of splitting apart the young 
republic over the question of slavery. He did not advocate the abolition of 
slavery while in office, but he signed legislation enforcing the prohibition of 
slavery in the Northwest Territory, writing to his good friend and 
Revolutionary War comrade, Marquis de la Fayette that he considered it a wise 
measure. Lafayette urged him to free his slaves as an example to others. 
Washington was held in such high regard after the revolution that there was 
reason to hope that if he freed his slaves, others would follow his example. 
Lafayette purchased an estate in French Guiana and settled his own slaves 
there, and he offered a place for Washington's slaves, writing, "I would never 
have drawn my sword in the cause of America if I could have conceived thereby 
that I was founding a land of slavery." Washington did not free his slaves in 
his lifetime but included a provision in his will to free the slaves upon the 
death of his wife. Martha Washington did not wait on this, and instead freed 
the Washington slaves on January 1, 1801. Billy Lee was the only slave freed 
outright upon George Washington's death. 

  One of Washington's slaves, Oney Judge Staines, escaped the Executive Mansion 
in Philadelphia in 1796 and lived the rest of her life free in New 
Hampshire.[12] 

   

  http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/George_Washington


   

  "El mundo es tuyo" 

   

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: Tracey de Morsella <tdemorse...@multiculturaladvantage.com>
  To: Albert Fields <cbilmarket...@yahoo.com>; kalpub...@aol.com; 
scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com; dar...@darylelockhart.com; afrikanm...@hotmail.com; 
bettil...@msn.com; cinque3...@verizon.net; dorothyh...@sbcglobal.net; 
duva...@hotmail.com; fis...@bellsouth.net; gwashin...@aol.com; 
jeffreypbal...@gmail.com; killa...@gmail.com; keithbjohn...@comcast.net; 
imke...@gmail.com; seriousnup...@yahoo.com; logic1...@aol.com; 
truthseeker...@icqmail.com; mmb1...@gmail.com; gord...@indiana.edu; 
michael.v.w.gor...@gmail.com; ravena...@yahoo.com; rs...@yahoo.com; 
everything...@nyc.rr.com; valeryjea...@yahoo.com; wendellsmit...@gmail.com; 
sonofafieldne...@sbcglobal.net; williamsf...@speakeasy.net; beta...@yahoo.com
  Sent: Sun, January 17, 2010 10:04:59 PM
  Subject: RE: George Washington became a abolitionist (in closet)




  It does not.  That is the subject that I put on the email subject line.  I 
put it because he worked so hard to keep the information off of the public 
record.  Someone who goes out of their way to free thei vr slaves, but attempts 
to hide it, is in my view, a closet abolitionist.  Just my perspective.

   

   

  From: Albert Fields [mailto:cbilmarket...@yahoo.com] 
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 7:49 PM
  To: tdemorse...@multiculturaladvantage.com; kalpub...@aol.com; 
scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com; dar...@darylelockhart.com; afrikanm...@hotmail.com; 
bettil...@msn.com; cinque3...@verizon.net; dorothyh...@sbcglobal.net; 
duva...@hotmail.com; fis...@bellsouth.net; gwashin...@aol.com; 
jeffreypbal...@gmail.com; killa...@gmail.com; keithbjohn...@comcast.net; 
imke...@gmail.com; seriousnup...@yahoo.com; logic1...@aol.com; 
truthseeker...@icqmail.com; mmb1...@gmail.com; gord...@indiana.edu; 
michael.v.w.gor...@gmail.com; ravena...@yahoo.com; rs...@yahoo.com; 
everything...@nyc.rr.com; valeryjea...@yahoo.com; wendellsmit...@gmail.com; 
sonofafieldne...@sbcglobal.net; williamsf...@speakeasy.net; beta...@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: George Washington became a abolitionist (in closet)

   

  Where does this say that washington was on the DL for abolistionist?

   

  I may be reading too, too fast.

   

  albert
   

  "El mundo es tuyo" 

   

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: Tracey de Morsella <tdemorse...@multiculturaladvantage.com>
  To: kalpub...@aol.com; scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com; dar...@darylelockhart.com; 
afrikanm...@hotmail.com; cbilmarket...@yahoo.com; bettil...@msn.com; 
cinque3...@verizon.net; dorothyh...@sbcglobal.net; duva...@hotmail.com; 
fis...@bellsouth.net; gwashin...@aol.com; jeffreypbal...@gmail.com; 
killa...@gmail.com; keithbjohn...@comcast.net; imke...@gmail.com; 
seriousnup...@yahoo.com; logic1...@aol.com; truthseeker...@icqmail.com; 
mmb1...@gmail.com; gord...@indiana.edu; michael.v.w.gor...@gmail.com; 
ravena...@yahoo.com; rs...@yahoo.com; everything...@nyc.rr.com; 
valeryjea...@yahoo.com; wendellsmit...@gmail.com; 
sonofafieldne...@sbcglobal.net; williamsf...@speakeasy.net; beta...@yahoo.com
  Sent: Sun, January 17, 2010 9:16:57 PM
  Subject: RE: George Washington became a abolitionist (in closet)



  Thanks for the heads up

   

   

  From: kalpub...@aol.com [mailto:kalpub...@aol.com] 
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 6:56 PM
  To: tdemorse...@multiculturaladvantage.com; scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com; 
dar...@darylelockhart.com; afrikanm...@hotmail.com; cbilmarket...@yahoo.com; 
bettil...@msn.com; cinque3...@verizon.net; dorothyh...@sbcglobal.net; 
duva...@hotmail.com; fis...@bellsouth.net; gwashin...@aol.com; 
jeffreypbal...@gmail.com; killa...@gmail.com; keithbjohn...@comcast.net; 
imke...@gmail.com; seriousnup...@yahoo.com; logic1...@aol.com; 
truthseeker...@icqmail.com; mmb1...@gmail.com; gord...@indiana.edu; 
michael.v.w.gor...@gmail.com; ravena...@yahoo.com; rs...@yahoo.com; 
everything...@nyc.rr.com; valeryjea...@yahoo.com; wendellsmit...@gmail.com; 
sonofafieldne...@sbcglobal.net; williamsf...@speakeasy.net; beta...@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: George Washington became a abolitionist (in closet)

   

  Tracy: This is corroborated by Frederick Douglass in his famous speech. Here 
is an excerpt....

   

   

  Excerpt from

  WHAT IS TO THE SLAVE THE FOURTH OF JULY?

                          by Frederick Douglass, July 5, 1852,

  Rochester, N.Y.

   

   

  There are illustrations of it near and remote, ancient and modern. It was 
fashionable, hundreds of years ago, for the children of Jacob to boast, we have 
"Abraham to our father," when they had long lost Abraham's faith and spirit. 
That people contented themselves under the shadow of Abraham's great name, 
while they repudiated the deeds which made his name great. Need I remind you 
that a similar thing is being done all over this country to-day? Need I tell 
you that the Jews are not the only people who built the tombs of the prophets, 
and gar­nished the sepulchers of the righteous? Washington could not die till 
he had broken the chains of his slaves. Yet his monument is built up by the 
price of human blood, and the traders in the bodies and souls of men, shout "We 
have Washington to our father." Alas! that it should be so; yet so it is.

   

  "The evil that men do, lives after them,

  The good is oft' interred with their bones."

  Fellow-citizens, pardon me, allow me to ask, why am I called upon to speak 
here to-day? What have I, or those I represent, to do with your national 
independence? Are the great principles of political free­dom and of natural 
justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independ­ence, extended to us? and am 
I, therefore, called upon to bring our humble offering to the national altar, 
and to confess the benefits and express devout gratitude for the blessings 
resulting from your inde­pendence to us?

   

   

  …. Fellow-citizens! there is no matter in respect to which, the people of the 
North have allowed themselves to be so ruinously imposed upon, as that of the 
pro-slavery character of the Constitution. In that instrument I hold there is 
neither warrant, license, nor sanction of the hateful thing; but, interpreted, 
as it ought to be interpreted, the Consti­tution is a GLORIOUS LIBERTY 
DOCUMENT. Read its preamble, consider its purposes. Is slavery among them? Is 
it at the gateway? or is it in the temple? it is neither. While I do not intend 
to argue this question on the present occasion, let me ask, if it be not 
somewhat singular that, if the Constitution were intended to be, by its framers 
and adopters, a slave-holding instrument, why neither slavery, slaveholding, 
nor slave can anywhere be found in it. What would be thought of an instrument, 
drawn up, legally drawn up, for the purpose of entitling the city of Rochester 
to a track of land, in which no mention of land was made? Now, there are 
certain rules of interpretation, for the proper under­standing of all legal 
instruments. These rules are well established. They are plain, common-sense 
rules, such as you and I, and all of us, can understand and apply, without 
having passed years in the study of law. I scout the idea that the question of 
the constitutionality, or un­constitutionality of slavery is not a question for 
the people. I hold that every American citizen has a right to form an opinion 
of the Constitu­tion, and to propagate that opinion, and to use all honorable 
means to make his opinion the prevailing one. Without this right, the liberty 
of an American citizen would be as insecure as that of a Frenchman. 
Ex­-Vice-President Dallas tells us that the Constitution is an object to which 
no American mind can be too attentive, and no American heart too devoted. He 
further says, the Constitution, in its words, is plain and intelligible, and is 
meant for the home-bred, unsophisticated under­standings of our 
fellow-citizens. Senator Berrien tells us that the Con­stitution is the 
fundamental law, that which controls all others. The charter of our liberties, 
which every citizen has a personal interest in understanding thoroughly. The 
testimony of Senator Breese, Lewis Cass, and many others that might be named, 
who are everywhere es­teemed as sound lawyers, so regard the Constitution. I 
take it, there­fore, that it is not presumption in a private citizen to form an 
opinion of that instrument.

   

   

   

  From: Chris de Morsella [mailto:cdemorse...@yahoo.com] 
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 6:23 PM
  To: tdemorse...@multiculturaladvantage.com
  Subject: RE George Washington and slavery

   

  Extracts from "Hidden Cities: The discovery and loss of ancient North
  American civilization" by Roger G. Kennedy (New York: The Free Press, 
  1994) pages 96 and 97:

  "After the [Revolutionary] war,...Philadelphia was the capital of the 
  United States...His [Washington's] first response to abolitionist 
  Philadelphia was to send his household slaves back to Mount Vernon to 
  avoid the automatic freedom required by the laws of Pennsylvania.

  "By September, 1793, however, he had reached the conclusion that he 
  wished to "liberate a certain species of property which I posess very 
  repugnantly to my feelings." This plan, revealed only to his secretary 
  and stripped from the documents kept in his public records...[but] the 
  laws of Virginia were not hospitable to manumission, however disguised.

  "When Washington left the presidency, and Philadelphia, in 1797, he 
  reversed his previous response to the laws of Pennsylvania. Instead of 
  sneaking his household slaves away, he sneaked them out of his household 
  into freedom, where their escape could not be detected by the 
  Virginians. Once back at Mount Vernon, surrounded by implacable 
  hostility to manumission on the part of all but a few of his neighbors, 
  he encouraged his slaves to marry, lest they be separated. In his will 
  he required that his executors support the old and infirm among his 
  slaves and provide to the young the same education received by Whites 
  until they were twenty-five and ready for employment. By then, he hoped, 
  the world would be ready for them. Finally, they were all to be set free 
  at the death of his wife. Since many of them had come to the family from 
  her, and since she would otherwise have been left with no one to tend 
  her in her last years, this seemed a reasonable provision.

  "A gulf had opened between Washington and other planters. By the end of 
  the 1790s, he rendered his judgement on the Peculiar Institution to a 
  visitor, John Bernard: "Nothing but the rooting out of slavery can 
  perpetuate the existence of our union by consolidating it in a common 
  bond of principle." One might expect such language from Abraham Lincoln 
  in 1864, or from John Quincy Adams in 1840, but not from an elderly 
  Virginia planter in 1797.

  "By then, Washington was full of surprises: he told Edmund Randolph, who 
  had been his attorney general, that should the Union separate north from 
  south, he had made up his mind "to move, and be of the Northern." "

   

   




  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.147/2628 - Release Date: 01/17/10 
02:35:00

Reply via email to