I guess that you didn't read the post about them auctioning off the Stargate
sets? That is a clear sign that they are moving in that direction. Green
screen can open up a lot of flexibility for them though. It just takes money
and rendering time to do it.

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:41 PM, C.W. Badie <astromancer2...@yahoo.com>wrote:

>
>
> Okay, I missed the Michael J. move...But I beg to differ on the use of the
> green screen...I've noticed SyFy's Sacuary and other like shows have been
> using g.s. backgrounds since Gemini Division aired...The trend of cheap
> production to come?
>
> "Such music flows on the Fringe, and no one can resist singing to Scarlet"
> From "THE SIDE STREET CHRONICLES" by C.W. Badie
>
> --- On *Tue, 1/26/10, Mr. Worf <hellomahog...@gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Mr. Worf <hellomahog...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" - Any good?
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 8:53 PM
>
>
> You forgot swing thrust kick slice and the ever popular jump like Michael
> Jordan kill move. The arena scene would have been awesome if they had kept
> them at speed because the effects were very realistic. (like the leg
> chopping) Stopping the action to do the blood gushing was just silly.
>
> The other thing that I thought was interesting about the production was the
> use of green screen. This may be one of the few shows that use it for most
> of the shots. The rest looked like shots from the Paramount lot.
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:22 PM, C.W. Badie <astromancer2002@ 
> yahoo.com<http://us.mc594.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=astromancer2...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>   All I got out of it was 'swing, thrust, (gush!), slice, block (gush!),
>> with slow motion on the (gush!) part...That is barely one aspect of "300."
>> There was a bit of a hint that people of that age had more blood in there
>> bodies...
>>
>>
>> "Such music flows on the Fringe, and no one can resist singing to Scarlet"
>> From "THE SIDE STREET CHRONICLES" by C.W. Badie
>>
>> --- On *Tue, 1/26/10, Martin Baxter <truthseeker013@ 
>> hotmail.com<http://us.mc594.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=truthseeker...@hotmail.com>
>> >* wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Martin Baxter <truthseeker013@ 
>> hotmail.com<http://us.mc594.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=truthseeker...@hotmail.com>>
>>
>>
>> Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" - Any good?
>> To: "SciFiNoir2" <scifino...@yahoogro 
>> ups.com<http://us.mc594.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=scifino...@yahoogroups.com>
>> >
>> Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 2:33 PM
>>
>>
>>  If that's all the show will ever be, then it would be more economical to
>> go out and buy "300" than to subscribe to Showtime.
>>
>> "If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
>> bloody hell hired the director?" -- Charles L Grant
>>
>> http://www.youtube. com/watch? 
>> v=fQUxw9aUVik<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
>>
>> From: HelloMahogany@ gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:44:00 +0000
>> Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" - Any good?
>>
>>
>>   All hail Spartacus! :)
>>
>> I just watched the first episode and I have to say that the director that
>> shot this must have had 300 on infinite replay when they were making this.
>> The fight scenes although realistic looking in action turn to cartoons when
>> everything is slowed down to allow the special effect blood to splatter
>> makes it laughable.
>>
>> Has anyone watched the series called Rome? Spartacus ain't it. Spartacus
>> is the dumbed down blood and guts version for teen boys that has nudity in
>> it. I don't think that when they shot this series that the actor knew that
>> they were going to make the serious action into gore porn.
>>
>> --- In scifino...@yahoogro 
>> ups.com<http://us.mc594.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=scifino...@yahoogroups.com>,
>> Martin Baxter <truthseeker013@ ...> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > (standing ovation)
>> >
>> > "If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
>> bloody hell hired the director?" -- Charles L Grant
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube. com/watch? 
>> > v=fQUxw9aUVik<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > To: scifino...@yahoogro 
>> > ups.com<http://us.mc594.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=scifino...@yahoogroups.com>
>>
>> > From: KeithBJohnson@ ...
>> > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:09:14 +0000
>> > Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" - Any good?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Absolutely, I just have an issue with lazy writing on that level unless
>> it's intentional. In "Hercules" and "Xena", for example, the anachronistic
>> language was intentional and sometimes funny. The god Apollo, for example,
>> was portrayed as a magical surfer type, who even said "Dude". But
>> "Spartacus", from what i can tell, is trying to be serious drama, so I just
>> can't get past such gaffes.
>> > I've noticed more and more in recent years that problem in historical
>> dramas. I see a lot of them where the characters are speaking idiomatically
>> as if they're from modern American. Even if they use the time-appropriate
>> words, the way those words are structured into phrases is just off. That
>> always irritates me. For example, don't tell me you're giving me a
>> well-written drama that takes place in, say, a Puritan village in the 1700s,
>> then have a young person ask another "How's it going?"
>> > Lazy...
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Mr. Worf" <HelloMahogany@ ...>
>> > To: scifino...@yahoogro 
>> > ups.com<http://us.mc594.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=scifino...@yahoogroups.com>
>> > Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 7:01:06 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> > Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" - Any good?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Nope... they say that it was invented around the 1100s. But there had to
>> be a similar word back then.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Keith Johnson <KeithBJohnson@ ...>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Was the f-word even being used by the Britons during the time of
>> Spartacus?
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Martin Baxter" <truthseeker013@ ...>
>> >
>> > To: "SciFiNoir2" <scifino...@yahoogro 
>> > ups.com<http://us.mc594.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=scifino...@yahoogroups.com>
>> >
>> > Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 3:17:28 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> >
>> > Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" - Any good?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Again with you all the way, Keith. THe curse words they're using are
>> mostly Anglo-Saxon, something that folks who live in Greece (If I've got the
>> geography right) aren't likely to speak.
>> >
>> > "If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
>> bloody hell hired the director?" -- Charles L Grant
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube. com/watch? 
>> > v=fQUxw9aUVik<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > To: scifino...@yahoogro 
>> > ups.com<http://us.mc594.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=scifino...@yahoogroups.com>
>>
>> >
>> > From: KeithBJohnson@ ...
>> > Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 04:37:09 +0000
>> > Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" - Any good?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Looking at part of it again, the fight scenes really do border on kinda
>> > funny, the "300"-style imitation is so over the top it reminds me more
>> > of the hilariously bloody fight scene with the Black Knight in "Monty
>> > Python and The Holy Grail". I mean, seriously, the blood is spattering
>> > and splatering like red water from a burst balloon. One dude got
>> > knocked in the back of the head, and blood sprayed all over it was
>> > funny. The showrunners seem to have an almost perverse interest in
>> > showing closeups of flesh cut and spread, bodies impaled. Silly,
>> > gratuitous, unmoving.
>> >
>> > Quite a bit of nudity too, including of Lucy Lawless I believe. Bit of
>> > a shock that, seeing Xena topless, but much better than seeing the
>> > dudes' naked bottoms. :(
>> >
>> > Also there seems to be quite a bit of anachronistic language. At least,
>> > I'm not sure the term "Where the fu** are the Romans?" is accurate for
>> > the times.
>> >
>> > Two showings, and I haven't been able to sit through the whole thing yet
>> without laughing or shaking my head at the whole thing.
>> >
>> > Anyone else?
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Keith Johnson" <keithbjohnson@ ...>
>>  > To: scifino...@yahoogro 
>> ups.com<http://us.mc594.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=scifino...@yahoogroups.com>
>> >
>> > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:28:04 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> > Subject: "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" - Any good?
>> >
>> > Anyone watch the debut of this series? It's showing on both one of the
>> Encore and Starz channels. I tried to watch the show, out of curiosity, and
>> because Lucy Lawless is one of the stars. But I came in in the middle of a
>> battle scene that frankly made me laugh and grown. Lawless in an interview
>> I'd seen mentioned the show was modeled in part on "300". But what I saw was
>> a bad imitation of "300": the same not-quite-real backgrounds, the now
>> recognizable fast-slow-fast movements of the soldiers in battle, blue-grey
>> backgrounds whose colors are splashed liberally with the blood flowing like
>> wine in battle. Lots of close ups of decapitations, swords cleaving flesh to
>> expose nasty cuts. it was all a bit too frenetic and artificial looking for
>> me. And I gotta admit that title--"...Blood and Sand" already had me a bit
>> leery.
>> >
>> > Granted, i didn't see anything but the battle. Maybe the actual acting
>> is good and it's worth a look? Can anyone give a recommendation?
>> > ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* *********
>> *********
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.starz. com/originals/ 
>> > spartacus<http://www.starz.com/originals/spartacus>
>> >
>> > Betrayed
>> > by the Romans. Forced into slavery. Reborn as a Gladiator. The classic
>> > tale of the Republic's most infamous rebel comes alive in the graphic
>> > and visceral new series, Spartacus: Blood and Sand. Torn from
>> > his homeland and the woman he loves, Spartacus is condemned to the
>> > brutal world of the arena where blood and death are primetime
>> > entertainment. But not all battles are fought upon the sands.
>> > Treachery, corruption, and the allure of sensual pleasures will
>> > constantly test Spartacus. To survive, he must become more than a man.
>> > More than a gladiator. He must become a legend.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Starring Australian actor, Andy Whitfield (McLeod's Daughters) as
>> Spartacus, Lucy Lawless (Xena: Warrior Princess) as Lucretia, John Hannah
>> (The Mummy, Four Weddings and A Funeral) as Batiatus and Peter Mensah (300,
>> The Incredible Hulk)
>> > as Doctore, this unique mix of live action, graphic novel effects and
>> > brutal battle sequences is set to make "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" an
>> > epic television event.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
>> > Mahogany at: http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/mahogany_ pleasures_
>> of_darkness/<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
>> > Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
>> > http://clk.atdmt. com/GBL/go/ 196390708/ 
>> > direct/01/<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it 
>> now.<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
> Mahogany at: http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/mahogany_ pleasures_
> of_darkness/<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/>
>
>
>
>
> 
>



-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/

Reply via email to