Good thing for now is we're a long way from this being available at the 
Wal-Mart, and practical enough to be used by a bunch of people. The working 
experiments now are extremely controlled and limited in scope, efficacy, and 
actual volume of area covered. The conditions are static, too: no one is moving 
around quickly, changing directions, moving through various lighting sources. 
And as the article points out, it's only effective on a small wavelength of 
light. We have a long way to go before a cloak--even a relatively simplistic 
one--is available that could cover a whole man or group of men at all 
wavelengths of light. 
I can imagine that, even when such cloaks are available, therefore, they could 
be detected at those wavelengths of light they're not particularly good at 
bending. Maybe banks will have to be fitted with UV emitters or microwave 
emitters or something, that would get around the cloaks' abilities. 
And I'm still not sure how someone inside an invisibility cloak can see outside 
of it without the apertures they use to see showing up as literal holes in the 
cloak (since the light that enters the user's eyes isn't curved like the rest 
of it, its absorption would show up as a hole in the cloak). 

Still, it's only a matter of a couple of decades I guess... 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rogue" <n1ro...@aol.com> 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 10:39:34 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Where's my Cloak of Invisibility? 







I agree with you on this. I can see it now, you have bad guys robbers using 
this cloak or a really bad knock off trying to rob banks and trying to steal or 
rape people. However there is a bright side to all of this. Kids or people who 
work would never again be late for anything you could always just slip in. 

--Dax 
I love mankind - it's people I can't stand! 




From: Mr. Worf 
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 3:28 PM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Where's my Cloak of Invisibility? 




I can see nothing but bad coming from this. 


On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Kelwyn < ravena...@yahoo.com > wrote: 


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100318/ap_on_sc/us_sci_cloak_of_invisibility 

Cloak of invisibility takes a step forward 

By RANDOLPH E. SCHMID, AP Science Writer – Thu Mar 18, 4:05 pm ET 

WASHINGTON – From Grimm's fairy tales to Harry Potter, the cloak of 
invisibility has played a major role in fiction. Now scientists have taken a 
small but important new step toward making it reality. 
Researchers at Germany's Karlsruhe Institute of Technology report they were 
able to cloak a tiny bump in a layer of gold, preventing its detection at 
nearly visible infrared frequencies. 

Their cloaking device also worked in three dimensions, while previously 
developed cloaks worked in two dimensions, lead researcher Tolga Ergin said. 

The cloak is a structure of crystals with air spaces in between, sort of like a 
woodpile, that bends light, hiding the bump in the gold later beneath, the 
researchers reported in Thursday's online edition of the journal Science. 



------------------------------------ 


Post your SciFiNoir Profile at 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYahoo 
! Groups Links 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/ 









-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/ 





Reply via email to