On 05/02/2013 04:26 PM, Jacob Vanderplas wrote: > The difficulty in testing arpack is not because it's backported: On > the contrary, I wrote a full test suite for it [1]. It's not been > merged because ARPACK is particularly unstable across platforms, and > folks thought that having no tests was better than having test > failures on some systems. It's not a problem with testing backports > per se. > Jake Yes, I know the problem is with ARPACK, and I know of your effort. Sorry if that wasn't clear from my message.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
