On 06/17/2013 04:46 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: >> With a long enough deprecation cycle, I'm +1. > I am -1 because I like the flexibility of the bunch-like object. However, > I think that we could move to a dictionary. > We could also use a named tuple. That would also support unwrapping, so we could have flexibility but could also directly access the content.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
