2013/6/17 Andreas Mueller <[email protected]>: > On 06/17/2013 04:46 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: >>> With a long enough deprecation cycle, I'm +1. >> I am -1 because I like the flexibility of the bunch-like object. However, >> I think that we could move to a dictionary. >> > We could also use a named tuple. > That would also support unwrapping, so we could have flexibility but > could also directly access the content.
Named what, Bunch? :p -- Lars Buitinck Scientific programmer, ILPS University of Amsterdam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
