Robert Roessler: > 3) replacing ALL >1 char width calls with "len * 10" gives a somewhat > less than perfect display... and NO perceived speedup; so it looks > like it is the actual rendering and display
Have you tried turning off buffering and two phase drawing? SCI_SETBUFFEREDDRAW, SCI_SETTWOPHASEDRAW. > 4) plugging in the latest [Windows] development builds of GLib and the > Pango/Cairo packages DOES improve perceived snappiness, BUT not enough > to "un-peg" the CPU Good. > So, IS the "Pango/GTK on Windows combo doomed"? Well, there sure are > a *lot* of software layers BEFORE even getting to Windows... I wonder > how this looks in a "native" GTK setting? GTK+ on X/Linux with currently released Pango, as for example in Fedora Core 4, is considerably slower than Windows native. > font.base=font:!Bitstream Vera Sans,size:10 > font.comment=font:!Bitstream Vera Serif,size:10 > > as my only "base" fonts (with all other fonts derived from these), > does that make my normal Windows-build SciTE/Scintilla use Pango? No. Native Windows versions will not use Pango. Neil _______________________________________________ Scintilla-interest mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest
