[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-50?page=comments#action_43386 ]
Emmanuel Venisse commented on SCM-50: ------------------------------------- all commands methods will be in ScmProvider. For obtain correct signature, each command must return a specific ScmResult. Actually all command implements the executeCommand method that return ScmResult, so we need to refactor all command and implements a specific interface by command and remove the executeCommand in Command interface For checkout, we'll do manager.getProvider().checkout(...) > flesh out the SCM provider interface > ------------------------------------ > > Key: SCM-50 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-50 > Project: Maven SCM > Type: Task > Components: maven-scm-api > Reporter: Brett Porter > Assignee: Emmanuel Venisse > Fix For: 1.0-alpha-2 > > > instead of having an execute() method, the ScmProvider interface should have > individual commands in the interface, like ScmManager currently does. > In fact, after this, the ScmManager need not have the commands, and just > needs to expose a getProvider method. > This should eventually lead to the removal of CommandNameConstants -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
