So Dan, you keep your config spec in ClearCase? But to build a release, you only need a config spec looking at the label. What is more in your config spec? Or am I not understanding things completely perhaps?

regards,

Wim

2005/11/24, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


dan tran a écrit :
>
>
> On 11/24/05, *Emmanuel Venisse* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> wrote:
>
>
>
>     dan tran a écrit :
>      > Wim, it looks good to me from base SCM configuration perspective.
>      >
>      > I use a mixture of UCM and base SCM configurations.  I keep the
>      > configspec file
>      > in base SCM.  At the time doing the label, I update the confispec
>     file
>      > and label that
>      > config spec only.
>      >
>      > At the perform step, i then create a view and load that
>     configspec file
>      > base the label
>      >
>      > and the rest is the same as yours.
>      >
>      > so our maven-scm's checkout and label command will be
>     different.  But we
>      > both use a
>      > config spec file during checkout.
>      >
>      > Emmanuel, how would we go about implementing these commands?
>
>     I don't know, you are our clearcase experts there.
>
>
> I meant from interface perspective since we are going to have 2
> diffirent behaviors of
> checkout and label.
>
> it is going to be 2 diffrent provider plexus components with some common
> commands?

So, checkout and label commands are different for you and Wim, right?
I think we need to keep only one clearcase provider. The svn url for clearcase is too simple, we can
perhaps modify it with type of clearcase configuration, and in checkout/label command, you check the
type of configuration and execute correct clearcase commands.

WDYT?

>
>      >
>      > I will be out to town with limited access to internet.  Will discuss
>      > more when I get back.
>      >
>      > -D
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > On 11/23/05, *Wim Deblauwe* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>      > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
>     wrote:
>      >
>      >     Hi,
>      >
>      >     to make release:perform work on ClearCase we need to
>     implement the
>      >     'checkout' command for ClearCase (this is not what ClearCase user
>      >     would call checkout!). As I understand it, 'checkout' should
>     copy
>      >     the files (with a certain tag) from the source control system
>     to a
>      >     certain directory and then the build should start on those
>     files. So
>      >     this is what we need for ClearCase:
>      >
>      >     - create a view with a config spec: Since we need to look at a
>      >     released version and it has been labeled in release:prepare
>     if all
>      >     is ok, we only need 1 line in the config spec, like this
>      >
>      >     ELEMENT * RLS_MYPROJECT_V1.0
>      >
>      >     - mount the correct vob. Don't know if this is really
>     necessairy,
>      >     the correct vob should normally already be mounted
>      >     - cd to the created view
>      >     - copy everything to a directory (or run the build from the newly
>      >     created view?)
>      >
>      >     This is the commando's I think we will need to call:
>      >
>      >     // First create the view
>      >     cleartool mkview -tag maven_release_build_view
>      >     \\MYCOMPUTER\cc_vws1\maven_release_build_view.vws
>      >     // Assign the correct config spec
>      >     [Create a temp file called configspec.txt with the config
>     spec in it]
>      >     cleartool setcs -tag maven_release_build_view configspec.txt
>      >     [Following 2 lines maybe better left out for now]
>      >     cleartool umount -all
>      >     cleartool mount \my_own_vob
>      >
>      >     //Do the build here
>      >
>      >     //Call the following line after the build - If this is not
>     possible
>      >     to call after the build, run it at the start of the next build
>      >     cleartool rmview -force -tag maven_release_build_view
>      >
>      >
>      >     anybody who agrees or disagrees, please comment!
>      >
>      >     regards,
>      >
>      >     Wim
>      >
>      >
>
>


Reply via email to