Hi Brett, 2008/8/12 Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Will they still be included in source distribution as well as the JARs?
As usually in the /META-INF but not in the root of JARs. See [1] for instance. > > I don't think there's any harm in having the license in the source > repository as well. IMHO it is redundant to have LICENSE file in the repo and it is inconsistent with other Maven source repos. NOTICE was wrong. See [2] vs [1]. Cheers, Vincent [1] http://people.apache.org/~olamy/staging-repo/org/apache/maven/scm/maven-scm-provider-perforce/1.1/ [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-perforce/NOTICE.txt?view=markup&pathrev=685270 > > On 13/08/2008, at 3:32 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> ok to remove. >> >> -- >> Olivier >> >> 2008/8/12 Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed that the trunk has some files like: >>> LICENSE.TXT >>> NOTICE.TXT >>> checkstyle-license.txt >>> >>> Are they useful? If not, WDYT to remove them? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Vincent >>> > > -- > Brett Porter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > >
