On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:41 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I disagree. I am currently taking action on it. There is some > > documentation on the wiki describing my direction, and I'm writing some > test > > code to explore further. > > I am afraid you're the only one who knows what you're doing. =) If you > could paste a reference to this specific wiki location, I could change > my mind, but so far I am definitely not in the list of people who are > able to track this progress. http://www.scons.org/wiki/ToolchainRevamp (and related sub-pages). There was some mailing list discussion which I wanted to cut and paste into the discussion page but didn't get around to that yet. Admittedly this is not 100% up to date but it describes the general approach I'm investigating. I have a separate repo where I'm working on some test implementations, starting with a basic test framework for a new Tool base class and a ToolRegistry (my tasks for this weekend if I can get enough time). But it's nowhere near ready to share, which is why I just posted some pseudocode on that wiki page. I need to strike a balance between sharing the design and being transparent so people can give feedback, and trying things out. -- Gary
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev