I'm here too -- more or less.  Having worked a little bit with you on the
original version of this, I'd very much like to see it get in.  Your #2 is
fine I think.  #1 is complicated.  #3 I don't remember the details, will
have to review again.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Bill Deegan <b...@baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:

> William,
>
> Nothing that you've written to this email can be properly responded to
> with a brief look a the code or issues involved.
> So first let me say thank you for your persistence on working on this
> issue and looking deeper into SCons than most.
>
> For myself I've been training for a half IronMan which has eaten up the
> bulk of my alotted open source participation time.
> Luckily that event is Sunday and so next week (assuming I survive ;) I'll
> have time to do a deep dig and give thoughtful comments.
>
> -Bill
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:23 PM, William Blevins <wblevins...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah.  The last few times I used the Dev list no one responded, so I just
>> wanted to make sure someone was out there somewhere :)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Jason Kenny <dragon...@live.com> wrote:
>>
>>>   I have.. I plan to respond soon [image: Smile]
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>  *From:* William Blevins <wblevins...@gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 8, 2015 5:59 PM
>>> *To:* SCons developer list <scons-dev@scons.org>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-dev] Cross-language support
>>>
>>>   Is there anyone on this mailing list?
>>>
>>> I just want to make sure someone *might* have even read this email.
>>>
>>> V/R,
>>> William
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:38 PM, William Blevins <wblevins...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>     Team,
>>>>
>>>> Due to some upcoming real life events, I would like to wrap up the
>>>> cross-language scanner support materials by Sept 1, 2015.  I was working
>>>> with Jason recently, but he got side-tracked with his own real life events.
>>>>
>>>> It is mostly complete.  There are really only 3 remaining items that I
>>>> am aware (might be some other languages I cannot test). Details available
>>>> in the patch discussion:
>>>> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-request/237/issue-2264-cross-language-scanner-support/diff
>>>>
>>>> TL;DR
>>>> 1. Recursive install scanning.  This one is somewhat involved, but
>>>> could be easy if we decide to simply disable scanner recursion of the
>>>> install builder.  Not sure if this is an option.
>>>> 2. Is the Ignore() for QT satisfactory?  I assume yes.
>>>> 3. Is enforcing valid keys satisfactory?  I can return the input if not
>>>> which will be similar to past behavior.
>>>>
>>>> V/R,
>>>> William
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev@scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-dev mailing list
>>> Scons-dev@scons.org
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-dev mailing list
>> Scons-dev@scons.org
>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev@scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>


-- 
Gary
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Reply via email to