All, So are we good with: http://contributor-covenant.org/
If so I'll add it to the new website. -Bill On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de> wrote: > Anatoly, > > Am 28.12.2015 um 15:33 schrieb anatoly techtonik: > >> [...] >> >>> I'm not sure why you're objecting to this unless you think you are >>> likely to >>> violate a CoC.. >>> >> Because following CoC makes people CoC-followers, which is offensive for >> some. Don't be a jerk rule is good enough and the rules should be applied >> only when they are needed on personal basis. >> >> I am against CoCs. It makes me feel regulated and I am sick and tired of >> that, >> so I likely to act against it and you have to ban me. >> > feel free to "act against it", but "filibustering" (refer to > http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/filibuster and optionally > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q52kFL8zVoM ) won't help. We've already > reached consensus to have a simple CoC and are simply ironing out the last > details. > > @all: Are we ready to move on with this one and take some action? I am... > > Best regards, > > Dirk > > P.S.: Nobody wants to ban you. We'll simply continue with our plan and are > ready to face the consequences of you getting "sick and tired" about > feeling regulated again... > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev