On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 09:23 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > I think reporting bugs for one part of SCons in a different > repository is > not a good idea.
I do not disagree. But having the codebase on BitBucket and the issue handler on Tigris is a dreadful set up in my view. If the issue handler was on BitBucket life would be a lot easier. However, every time this topic comes up we end up at "someone insists that the project cannot survive without the entire history, and no-one can be bothered to dothe transfer" so nothing happens. Of course Tigris looks like it is going away by the look of the sign saying "no more projects". If that happens and nothing is done, history gets lost anyway. I'd suggest opening up the issue tracker on the SCons repository on BitBucket sooner rather than later. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
