On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 7:39 PM Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 13:54 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > > […] > > > > Regardless I think we've covered the bases in this discussion and > > let's > > revisit Jan 2019 to see what makes sense. > > The thoughtful discussion is much appreciated! > > In the end, SCons development must be a do-ocracy (an Apache concept I > believe), in that those who actually do development stuff have vastly > more votes than those who watch development. Obviously those who use > and report back also must have a voice.
Just a reminder that mindless do-ocracy is the best way to kill backward compatibility and lose user base. From the other side, it always possible to fork away something like waf. :) -- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
