On Sun, 2018-07-22 at 23:35 +0800, anatoly techtonik wrote: > […] > Just a reminder that mindless do-ocracy is the best way to kill > backward > compatibility and lose user base. From the other side, it always > possible to > fork away something like waf. :)
That's why I mentioned Apache. As Jason has pointed out, there is a formal structure to release, and hence testing, and big decision making in general. The system is actually a good one – even though I have many, many reservations about The Apache Way. What's Waf's traction/market penetration like? If one is to consider competitors to SCons, Meson is the threat. -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
