That makes sense, Mats. Thanks for the additional insight. On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 10:30 Mats Wichmann <m...@wichmann.us> wrote:
> On 9/2/19 8:03 AM, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > > Note that you can subscribe to a GitHub issue without commenting. This > > is preferred as it avoids spamming all currently-subscribed users. > > > > Also, I think mass/automated bug closing needs to be done very > > conservatively. Closing an issue doesn't make the bug go away. There are > > projects that have bots which close issues after 30 days of inactivity, > > and I find it infuriating. > > I'm not a fan of the rapid/aggressive closing either, wasn't suggesting > that. The idea of a bot is to keep there from being so much manual work > to get the notifications sent, and the closing done. If the team prefers > no not keep it after the prune, it can just be turned off. > > There are a decent number of bugs that were created over 10 years ago, > and many in the 3-10 year range, and which, due to the migration from > tigris, aren't really associated with people who may have reported them, > or commented on them. > > The idea of commenting to keep a bug alive is to defeat the bot's idea > of what is active (and to confirm "yes, this is still a problem"). I > don't think subscribing to it does that. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev