Too much work for the G release. Would you be able to help us clean up the xmlbeans issues for now?
thanks, dims On 4/12/07, Anil Saldhana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
XML binding issues in Scout only arrive at when the request is made to a registry and response is received. This has caused some issues in the various branches - trunk uses xmlbeans and one of the branches uses juddi. We can standardize on JAXB. Do you think it will be pragmatic to just abstract a layer out for binding and let users put in whatever binding layer they want? Just a thought. Not given too much thought into details. Kurt T Stam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now that Java6 contains JAXB it makes more sense to use JAXB. I know most people can't use java6 yet, so at least for a while we'd need to use JAXME (or SUN's JAXB implementation), but I'd like to keep the number of dependencies low. Does anyone know if XMLBeans is going to support JAXB, if so this discussion is pointless :). Cheers, --Kurt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________ Get your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
-- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
