Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-28
-- dims On 4/12/07, Kurt T Stam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What are the exact issues you are having? Certainly when using a local transport things seem to work ok for me. Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Too much work for the G release. Would you be able to help us clean up > the xmlbeans issues for now? > > thanks, > dims > > On 4/12/07, Anil Saldhana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> XML binding issues in Scout only arrive at when the request is made to a >> registry and response is received. This has caused some issues in the >> various branches - trunk uses xmlbeans and one of the branches uses >> juddi. >> We can standardize on JAXB. >> >> Do you think it will be pragmatic to just abstract a layer out for >> binding >> and let users put in whatever binding layer they want? Just a >> thought. Not >> given too much thought into details. >> >> Kurt T Stam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Now that Java6 contains JAXB it makes more sense to use JAXB. I know >> most people can't use java6 yet, so >> at least for a while we'd need to use JAXME (or SUN's JAXB >> implementation), but I'd like to keep the number of dependencies low. >> Does anyone know if XMLBeans is going to support JAXB, if so this >> discussion is pointless :). >> >> Cheers, >> --Kurt >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> Get your own web address. >> Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business. >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
