It did build the device_tools files when I did a 4.5.2 linaro -- it just didn't when I did a 4.5.3 one, which is what confused me, and made me send mail :) I didn't do anything differently when I did it for 4.5.2 than when I did the 4.5.3 one, so I can't see why the result would be different.
Did you post your linaro on the downloads page? (All I see are ones named cs*, which I assume are CodeSourcery ones.) Thanks, Diane On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Jussi Hakala <jussi.hak...@movial.com>wrote: > On 05/05/2011 10:42 AM, Diane Holt wrote: > >> This time, I didn't get any of that. There's >> no error in the make output, there's just no mention of those things at >> all. I also just noticed that, while I do have a device_tools subdir, >> there's no Makefile in it. There's one in meta/device_tools, but not in >> sb-toolchain-extras/device_tools (just a category.mk >> <http://category.mk>). Is there supposed to be one? If there is, where's >> >> it supposed to come from? If there isn't supposed to be, can you think >> of any reason why this stuff didn't get built? (FTR, I'm running the >> foreign-toolchain process on a linaro 4.5.3 arm.) >> > > All the new output from sb-toolchain-extras should go to > > /scratchbox/device_tools/toolname-version/new-compiler > /scratchbox/compilers/new-compiler > > or their subdirectories. > > There's a fair bit of residual makefiles that come from original > toolchain-extras, so maybe you've run a wrong target and/or you've run make > in a wrong subdirectory? > > As suggested by the wiki the process should be something like this > > % make CONFIG=meta/alien-tc/myconf.conf -C meta/alien-tc all-sums > % make CONFIG=meta/alien-tc/myconf.conf -C meta/alien-tc > > and for packaging > > make CONFIG=meta/alien-tc/myconf.conf VERSION=1.0.22 all-packages > > where version is usually sb-toolchain-extras-version, or some arbitrary > version number you'd like to assign to the packages (the packaging version > comes from the toolchain config). > > I have a packaging somewhere of the linaro gcc-4.5 2011.04 and as far as I > recall, it used to package just fine. > > Regards, > > Jussi > _______________________________________________ > Scratchbox-users mailing list > Scratchbox-users@lists.scratchbox.org > http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users >
_______________________________________________ Scratchbox-users mailing list Scratchbox-users@lists.scratchbox.org http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users
