Craig Bradney wrote: > On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 19:20, Craig Bradney wrote: >
>> >>As mentioned previously (today) on the list, it seems to be an issue >>with Qt 3.1.x getting confused. Anyone I have spoken to that has given >>me version numbers of their Qt and had Qt 3.2.x+ have not had this issue >>at all. >> >>We have a potential fix in the works for this issue, and I expect it >>will be in CVS tonight. >> >>Gregory, I have looked through all of your emails posted to the mailing >>list since I joined it and I see no report ever of a Qt version. Would >>you mind letting me know this please? > > > Sorry. I correct myself.. I missed the Qt 3.1.1-6 email from Nov 02. You > said then you might look at Qt 3.1.2, did you upgrade Qt? FYI: I have Qt 3.1.2-2.0.9 I'll check out the new cvs version. Gregory Pittman
