Craig Bradney wrote: >On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 17:26, Gregory Pittman wrote: > > >>I think we can all understand the size of the job of updating the >>documentation for Scribus. What I am wondering is why the documentation >>isn't being done and made available in some kind of modular format, >>especially considering the ever-changing nature of the CVS version. >> >> >Well.. if theres no docs.. ask, or play and learn.. > >Meanwhile.. we are in the process of rewriting those docs and creating a >new website for them, to be released with 1.2. (as has been said before >on the list! more than once!) > >Some features arent finished yet, or finished between developers >releases.. why should we write user docs for an unfinished feature.... > >Please.. > >Craig > > I'm asking, I'm playing, I'm learning, I'm playing...
<butmoreseriously> My counterpoint would be two things, 1. If Scribus itself were released after it was 'done', it wouldn't be out yet. 2. It's possible that in the process of writing about a feature, one can realize, 'you know, that's not really the way it should be...' </butmoreseriously> I love this program! Greg P
