Christoph Sch?fer wrote: > Hi Peter, > >> There really are not many elements needed. The ones I use in my HTML >> approach >> are more or less only <em>, <strong> and <code>. > > > at first glance, using HTML seems not a bad idea, and I know of at > least workflow which is built on HTML.
I didn't think Peter was suggesting *using* HTML, only that he only needed a few different tags. At any rate, the reason HTML itself won't work is the reason that XML exists in the first place -- HTML is a markup designed for a particular purpose, rather than being multipotential and flexible. Greg
