On Friday 16 September 2005 15:42, Maciej Hanski wrote: > Hi, > I'm somewhat confused after having read those recent notes on the Wiki's > licencing: > > http://wiki.scribus.net/index.php/Licensing > > in particular, this part of them: > > <quoting> > "This wiki forms a "users for users" website, shall we say, and the main > Scribus team contributes content for public discussion such as the > development roadmap, and articles as necessary but these are not > intended to be used on the other site as posted here." > </quoting> > > It is surely merely a misunderstanding, but it sounds, like Scribus > Wiki users/authors were not allowed to execute some of their rights,
Maciej, Perhaps I have made it clearer now by replacing "the other site" with "the official documentation site". The other site was referred to in the first sentence. That is, if there is not other license posted for a particular page then it falls under the CCAS license as you correctly stated. Users may do what they wish within the bounds of that license. What the paragraph states is that we will not post official *documentation* on both sites, but may write up some summaries and edit and assist users, but the main bulk of documentation will be posted on docs.scribus.net. best regards Craig -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20050916/e28ee682/attachment.pgp
