Craig Bradney wrote: > On Friday 16 September 2005 15:42, Maciej Hanski wrote: > >>Hi, >>I'm somewhat confused after having read those recent notes on the Wiki's >>licencing: >> >>http://wiki.scribus.net/index.php/Licensing >> >>in particular, this part of them: >> >><quoting> >>"This wiki forms a "users for users" website, shall we say, and the main >>Scribus team contributes content for public discussion such as the >>development roadmap, and articles as necessary but these are not >>intended to be used on the other site as posted here." >></quoting> >> >>It is surely merely a misunderstanding, but it sounds, like Scribus >>Wiki users/authors were not allowed to execute some of their rights, > > > Maciej, > > Perhaps I have made it clearer now by replacing "the other site" with "the > official documentation site". The other site was referred to in the first > sentence. > > That is, if there is not other license posted for a particular page then it > falls under the CCAS license as you correctly stated. Users may do what they > wish within the bounds of that license. What the paragraph states is that we > will not post official *documentation* on both sites, but may write up some > summaries and edit and assist users, but the main bulk of documentation will > be posted on docs.scribus.net. > > best regards > Craig > Thanks Craig, now everything is clear, obviously I misunderstood the previous statement.
br Maciej
