Peter Nermander wrote: >> To me, this is one of the confusing things about advice on the list. >> When people ask about some feature that doesn't exist on 1.2.x they are >> told to use 1.3.x, but when they complain about some rough edges in >> 1.3.x, they are told they shouldn't be using 1.3.x for "production work." >> > > The Scribus project uses a convention (same as Linux kernel if I understand > right) that only "even" version are considered stable. "Odd" versions are > development versions and their focus is not aimed at stability but > improvement. > > So, 1.2 is the current stable version, the next stable version will be 1.4. > I guess what you're suggesting is that the entire series of 1.3.x will be unstable, then magically 1.4 will be stable?
Greg
