mamem at gmx.net wrote: > I think there is really a very big misunderstandig about the "status" > of this 1.3.4 release. It should have been marked cvs or beta since > the beginnig... > It seems to be non stable, for non-production and developpment. > > This is what I understand in the answers on this list, and that the > 1.3.3.9 and next 1.3.3.10 is the "stable" production branch... > > am I right? > Use 1.3.4 only if you're willing to live dangerously.
Greg
