On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Gregory Pittman wrote: > mamem at gmx.net wrote: > > I think there is really a very big misunderstandig about the > > "status" of this 1.3.4 release. It should have been marked cvs or > > beta since the beginnig... > > It seems to be non stable, for non-production and developpment. > > > > This is what I understand in the answers on this list, and that > > the 1.3.3.9 and next 1.3.3.10 is the "stable" production > > branch... > > > > am I right? > Use 1.3.4 only if you're willing to live dangerously. > > Greg > _______________________________________________ > Scribus mailing list > Scribus at nashi.altmuehlnet.de > http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/mailman/listinfo/scribus
Hi, Well, I was the one who did not put the 1.3.4 download link on the front page of www for a reason. I did not want new visitors to think that 1.3.4 was the default or stable release. That said, while 1.3.4 *is* a development release, it is very much usable and worth testing. Not everything works 100%, but the wide testing it has had already and bug reports are very useful. Exactly what a development release is about. Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20070607/70643c46/attachment.pgp
