2008/11/13 Peter Nermander <peter at nermander.se>: > It is useful to know that Scribus (as far as I know) uses ghostscript for > this import. To see if the file renders correctly by ghostscript you could > use gv or GhostView. > > If they can not show it correctly, Scribus can not rasterize it correctly. Well, that's why i'm worrying.
A little "test", one bar "music": PS by LilyPond: http://brownian.org.ua/plain/scribus/first-barno.ps (468K) PDF by LilyPond: http://brownian.org.ua/plain/scribus/first-barno.pdf (20K) PS was imported into Scribus document and exported as PDF: http://brownian.org.ua/plain/scribus/first-barno-scribus.pdf (17K) Note stems... So, first two files look good in ghostview, kpdf etc. and acroread. The third one looks bad. That's why i'm worrying. Scribus 1.3.4, 2007-05-27, C-C-T-F-C, using Ghostscript 8.15.4. Linux. > /Peter -- Dmytro O. Redchuk
