> 2008/11/13 Peter Nermander <peter at nermander.se>: >> It is useful to know that Scribus (as far as I know) uses >> ghostscript for >> this import. To see if the file renders correctly by ghostscript you >> could >> use gv or GhostView. >> >> If they can not show it correctly, Scribus can not rasterize it >> correctly. > Well, that's why i'm worrying. > > A little "test", one bar "music": > PS by LilyPond: http://brownian.org.ua/plain/scribus/first-barno.ps > (468K) > PDF by LilyPond: http://brownian.org.ua/plain/scribus/first-barno.pdf > (20K) > > PS was imported into Scribus document and exported as PDF: > http://brownian.org.ua/plain/scribus/first-barno-scribus.pdf (17K) > > Note stems... So, first two files look good in ghostview, kpdf etc. > and acroread. > > The third one looks bad. > > That's why i'm worrying.
Hi, Just playing with that a bit, # pstoedit -f gs:pdfwrite first-barno.ps nnnn.pdf produced a good pdf Owen
