<< From what I understand it is because Scribus places the text glyph by glyph on the page. I guess other programs place the text line by line, which means the PDF will contain fewer "cursor placement commands".
So, it is not a matter of Scribus not compressing images, it is a matter of Scribus being "better" on exact placing of glyphs. >> So that is needed for "proper" publisher printing? Could/Should a Web optimised PDF output option not do it differently? As ever different users will have different needs and insert debate on who Scribus should service here. K.
