2009/3/24 Andrew Duck <[email protected]> > I'm more interested in why this functionality was introduced at all in 4.1 > if it is not feature-complete. At an object-level without being version or >
You are not obliged to use it now. We had already quite some use cases with states at the object level, so decided to include it in 4.1 > language-aware there is limited use for object states, and if such changes > are to occur in 4.2 what type of BC breaks could be expected in the coming > release? It seems a little pointless and error-prone to me. > More granularity in the scope of object states does not necessarily mean BC breaks Paul
-- Sdk-public mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/sdk-public
