My mistake - I was reading between the lines and thought you were looking for a network-less deployment solution.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:43:55AM -0700, Jason King wrote: > > Bundler does a very good job at hunting down and resolving dependencies, > I'd > > use it to create your snapshot of what you need. It will also allow you > to > > package up all the gems for simple distribution (without needing to > download > > them again). > > To be clear, there's nothing stopping me from invoking "gem install" for > all > of the stuff I need. This is just my local machine, and I'm working with a > custom-compiled Ruby 1.9.2 isolated within my home directory. > > The whole point of this exercise is to improve my understanding. Using > Bundler would defeat the purpose. > > Bundler is actually on my list of gems-to-install-manually. :) I intend to > test-drive several gem-templating modules, including Mr. Bones, Jeweler, > and > NewGem. Jeweler's Rakefile has a dependency on Bundler. > > Marvin Humphrey > > -- > SD Ruby mailing list > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby > -- SD Ruby mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/sdruby
