For some context on the reasons for bringing jboss-logging into solder, please take a look at http://seamframework.org/Seam3/JBossLoggingIntegrationfor full details.
In a nutshell it's to enable us to remove the dependency on jboss-logging, while enabling us some flexibility in terms of creating our own annotations, that don't clash with jboss-logging and cause confusion. The reason being that the annotations within jboss-logging were never intended for developer consumption, they are intended for use within the JBoss AS container. For this reason the port into solder removes those annotations from jboss-logging, and moves them to a solder package where appropriate. Feel free to amend the wiki page if there are other items that you feel are of merit. Thanks Ken On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ken Finnigan <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's the link to the incorporation of jboss-logging into solder: > https://github.com/kenfinnigan/solder/tree/jboss-logging > > Appreciate any comments/feedback as still new at this. > > If it's easier for it to be a pull request just let me know. > > There will undoubtedly be a few additions to this once I work out how i18n > module will look at the best location for some of these changes, solder or > i18n. > > Thanks > Ken > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Dan Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As a team we need to review Ken's improvements and provide feedback >> because it's a critical piece of Seam, not to mention it's importance to the >> i18n API. >> >> Ken, it would be best to post the branch where the changes live (sorry if >> I'm a step behind if you already have). >> >> - Dan Allen >> >> Sent from my Android-powered phone: >> An open platform for carriers, consumers and developers >> On Jan 18, 2011 3:30 PM, "Ken Finnigan" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Dan Allen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 18:49, Jason Porter <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> I need a Solder release (I'm working on switching to beans.xml), then >> >>> I can release the alpha, and a beta quickly for Catch, or we could >> >>> still keep it at alpha. Though because it's such an integrated piece >> >>> ideally it should be beta. >> >>> >> >>> I think we should all be using the next release of solder if we can >> >>> make sure it works on Glassfish 3.0.1. I'll send a follow-up email >> >>> with my latest exception. >> >>> >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> Also, please use seam-parent 7 and seam-bom 3.0.0.b06...but stay tuned, >> I >> >> may update to seam-parent 8 to pull in the Weld 1.1.0.Final. >> >> >> >> -Dan >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Dan Allen >> >> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action >> >> Registered Linux User #231597 >> >> >> >> http://mojavelinux.com >> >> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >> >> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> seam-dev mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> >> >> >> >> > +1 to Solder release, especially after some logging/i18n changes have >> been >> > incorporated from some work I've done with Dan. >> > >> > In terms of i18n, there are a couple of things I would like to get done >> for >> > the first Beta, as it will likely change the API, that rely on the >> Solder >> > changes. Not sure whether I will be able to get them all complete by >> > Wed/Thu, though will see how I go tonight. >> > >> > Ken >> > >
_______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
