Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security 1.0.0 is released!
Great job Ben et gang Just a note, Ben I will be updating the contacts-tiger sample project, I noticed it was not converted over. I will create an JIRA entry for myself and update this tomorow. Also with Spring 2.0, I noticed that a jira entry was created for namespace handlers, XSD support, etc.. If you have someone to do this fine... otherwise I can take it up... its something that I would really like to get in... and reduce some of the XML verbosity. Cheers all, Mark On 5/29/06, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Spring Community > > After more than two and a half years of development, I am delighted to > announce that Acegi Security 1.0.0 is now officially released. > > In addition to more than 80 improvements and fixes since 1.0.0 RC2, this > new release also includes several changes to help new users. This > includes a significant restructure and expansion of the reference guide > (now more than 90 pages) and a new "bare bones" tutorial sample > application. Furthermore, many of the frequently-identified problems > experienced by new users have been addressed, such as custom 403 > messages (as opposed to using the Servlet Container's error handler), > detecting corrupt property input following the reformatting of XML > files, and a new logout filter. We've also refactored our LDAP services, > made the SecurityContextHolder a pluggable strategy (especially useful > for rich clients who wish to avoid ThreadLocal), and improved CAS support. > > Please visit > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10040&styleName=Html&version=10360 > for a detailed changelog. As always, detailed upgrade instructions are > included in the release ZIP file. > > The project's web site at http://acegisecurity.org provides additional > information on Acegi Security's features, access to online > documentation, and links to download the latest release. I will also be > providing a presentation on Acegi Security at SpringOne next month, so I > hope to see you there. > > We trust that you find this new release useful in your projects. > > Cheers > Ben > > > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security 1.0.0 is released!
Mark St.Godard wrote: > Just a note, Ben I will be updating the contacts-tiger sample project, > I noticed it was not converted over. I will create an JIRA entry for > myself and update this tomorow. > I just checked and it looked to me like it was built for 1.0.0. What specifically wasn't converted? > Also with Spring 2.0, I noticed that a jira entry was created for > namespace handlers, XSD support, etc.. > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-271 for those interested. > If you have someone to do this fine... otherwise I can take it up... > its something that I would really like to get in... and reduce some > of the XML verbosity. > > Uri Boness has volunteered, but I'm unsure whether work has commenced. I am happy for anyone to take a look at it who has sufficient time. As for verbose XML, I'd encourage people to take a look at the new tutorial sample, which is just 148 lines of XML. This includes comments, whitespace and full support for form authentication, remember-me, anonymous and web request authorization. I think that's a pretty good base given the features, but nevertheless it will be even less with SEC-271 improvements. Cheers Ben ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security 1.0.0 is released!
Hi Ben, The configuration was referencing "net.sf"... some of the config was moved over to "org." however not all. Including the userdetails refactoring. Plus some of the JSPs were also referencing "net.sf" in page imports. I am running through and testing the app right now, currently failing on a call to getPrincipal from User object... I will fix it up, retest it, run the unit testing and check in the changes. Re: the tutorial app... yeah I noticed that .. very nice... much more concise config. I am usng Spring 2.0 and I am really digging the schema-based config... I am also using MethodSecurityInterceptors using the new Aspect pointcuts. Not sure if we should also include examples of usage using Spring 2.0? I assume we need to wait for it to go final. Uri is on it...Great, I'll keep my eyes posted for :) Cheers Mark On 5/30/06, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark St.Godard wrote: > > Just a note, Ben I will be updating the contacts-tiger sample project, > > I noticed it was not converted over. I will create an JIRA entry for > > myself and update this tomorow. > > > I just checked and it looked to me like it was built for 1.0.0. What > specifically wasn't converted? > > > Also with Spring 2.0, I noticed that a jira entry was created for > > namespace handlers, XSD support, etc.. > > > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-271 for those > interested. > > > If you have someone to do this fine... otherwise I can take it up... > > its something that I would really like to get in... and reduce some > > of the XML verbosity. > > > > > Uri Boness has volunteered, but I'm unsure whether work has commenced. I > am happy for anyone to take a look at it who has sufficient time. > > As for verbose XML, I'd encourage people to take a look at the new > tutorial sample, which is just 148 lines of XML. This includes comments, > whitespace and full support for form authentication, remember-me, > anonymous and web request authorization. I think that's a pretty good > base given the features, but nevertheless it will be even less with > SEC-271 improvements. > > Cheers > Ben > > > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security 1.0.0 is released!
Can we get the maven repos updated? Right now mvn compile fails because "org.acegisecurity:acegi-security-parent:pom:1.0.0" cannot be downloaded. On 5/30/06, Mark St.Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > The configuration was referencing "net.sf"... some of the config was > moved over to "org." however not all. Including the userdetails > refactoring. Plus some of the JSPs were also referencing "net.sf" in > page imports. > > I am running through and testing the app right now, currently failing > on a call to getPrincipal from User object... I will fix it up, retest > it, run the unit testing and check in the changes. > > Re: the tutorial app... yeah I noticed that .. very nice... much more > concise config. > > I am usng Spring 2.0 and I am really digging the schema-based config... > > I am also using MethodSecurityInterceptors using the new Aspect pointcuts. > Not sure if we should also include examples of usage using Spring 2.0? > I assume we need to wait for it to go final. > > Uri is on it...Great, I'll keep my eyes posted for :) > > Cheers > Mark > > On 5/30/06, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mark St.Godard wrote: > > > Just a note, Ben I will be updating the contacts-tiger sample project, > > > I noticed it was not converted over. I will create an JIRA entry for > > > myself and update this tomorow. > > > > > I just checked and it looked to me like it was built for 1.0.0. What > > specifically wasn't converted? > > > > > Also with Spring 2.0, I noticed that a jira entry was created for > > > namespace handlers, XSD support, etc.. > > > > > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-271 for those > > interested. > > > > > If you have someone to do this fine... otherwise I can take it up... > > > its something that I would really like to get in... and reduce some > > > of the XML verbosity. > > > > > > > > Uri Boness has volunteered, but I'm unsure whether work has commenced. I > > am happy for anyone to take a look at it who has sufficient time. > > > > As for verbose XML, I'd encourage people to take a look at the new > > tutorial sample, which is just 148 lines of XML. This includes comments, > > whitespace and full support for form authentication, remember-me, > > anonymous and web request authorization. I think that's a pretty good > > base given the features, but nevertheless it will be even less with > > SEC-271 improvements. > > > > Cheers > > Ben > > > > > > ___ > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security 1.0.0 is released!
I'll take care of that On 5/30/06, Ray Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can we get the maven repos updated? > Right now mvn compile fails because > "org.acegisecurity:acegi-security-parent:pom:1.0.0" cannot be > downloaded. > > On 5/30/06, Mark St.Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > The configuration was referencing "net.sf"... some of the config was > > moved over to "org." however not all. Including the userdetails > > refactoring. Plus some of the JSPs were also referencing "net.sf" in > > page imports. > > > > I am running through and testing the app right now, currently failing > > on a call to getPrincipal from User object... I will fix it up, retest > > it, run the unit testing and check in the changes. > > > > Re: the tutorial app... yeah I noticed that .. very nice... much more > > concise config. > > > > I am usng Spring 2.0 and I am really digging the schema-based config... > > > > I am also using MethodSecurityInterceptors using the new Aspect pointcuts. > > Not sure if we should also include examples of usage using Spring 2.0? > > I assume we need to wait for it to go final. > > > > Uri is on it...Great, I'll keep my eyes posted for :) > > > > Cheers > > Mark > > > > On 5/30/06, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mark St.Godard wrote: > > > > Just a note, Ben I will be updating the contacts-tiger sample project, > > > > I noticed it was not converted over. I will create an JIRA entry for > > > > myself and update this tomorow. > > > > > > > I just checked and it looked to me like it was built for 1.0.0. What > > > specifically wasn't converted? > > > > > > > Also with Spring 2.0, I noticed that a jira entry was created for > > > > namespace handlers, XSD support, etc.. > > > > > > > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-271 for those > > > interested. > > > > > > > If you have someone to do this fine... otherwise I can take it up... > > > > its something that I would really like to get in... and reduce some > > > > of the XML verbosity. > > > > > > > > > > > Uri Boness has volunteered, but I'm unsure whether work has commenced. I > > > am happy for anyone to take a look at it who has sufficient time. > > > > > > As for verbose XML, I'd encourage people to take a look at the new > > > tutorial sample, which is just 148 lines of XML. This includes comments, > > > whitespace and full support for form authentication, remember-me, > > > anonymous and web request authorization. I think that's a pretty good > > > base given the features, but nevertheless it will be even less with > > > SEC-271 improvements. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Ben > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > > > > > > ___ > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > > ___ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list Acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
