Regarding TSM db and log mirroring

2005-05-19 Thread Farren Minns
Hi all

I have a question regarding TSM database and log mirroring. I already use
this approach but am unsure what the effects would be if we were to lose
one of our disks ( i.e. one side of the mirror is broken ). How does TSM
cope with this? Does it keep running? What are the steps required to fix a
broken mirror etc?

All help is appreciated as always

Many thanks

Farren Minns
Solaris System Admin / Oracle DBA
IT - Hosting Services

John Wiley  Sons, Ltd.


##
The information contained in this e-mail and any subsequent
correspondence is private and confidential and intended solely
for the named recipient(s).  If you are not a named recipient,
you must not copy, distribute, or disseminate the information,
open any attachment, or take any action in reliance on it.  If you
have received the e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete
the e-mail.

Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
individual sender, unless otherwise stated.  Although this e-mail has
been scanned for viruses you should rely on your own virus check, as
the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising out of any bug
or virus infection.
##


SV: Group-wise enabled TSAFS for backup

2005-05-19 Thread Hougaard.Flemming FHG
Hi Troy

You will get a lot of open file errors using this option... it's working as 
designed! All temp. files, system files etc. which is possible to recreate 
through installation is not being processed in this open file option - I 
presume it works like GWTSA.NLM and in this case the following is being backed 
up (which is enough to recreate your GroupWise):

GroupWise Location  Directories 
Subdirectories/Files Backed Up 

Domain  domain_directory
wpdomain.db 

wpdomain.dc 

wphost.dc 

gwdom.dc 

gwpo.dc 

mtaname
 
 
domain_directory\wpgate 
async 

gwia 

webac60a 

etc.
 

Post Office post_office_directory   
wphost.db 

ngwguard.db 

ngwguard.dc 

ngwguard.rfl 

ngwguard.fbk 

ngwcheck.db 

ngwcheck.log 

gwpo.dc
 
post_office_directory\gwdms 
dmsh.db
 
post_office_directory\gwdms\library_directory   
*.db 

archive\*.* 

docs\*.*
 
post_office_directory\offiles   
*.*
 
post_office_directory\ofmsg\guardbak
ngwguard.fbk
 
post_office_directory\ofusr 
userxxx.db
 
post_office_directory\ofusr\index   
*.idx 

*.inc
 
post_office_directory\ofviews\win   
*.vew 

*.ini
 
Library (Document Storage Area) Library_directory   
*.db 

archive\*.* 

docs\*.*
 

Regards
Flemming


-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Troy Frank
Sendt: 17. maj 2005 17:24
Til: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Emne: Re: Group-wise enabled TSAFS for backup


I started testing the /EnableGW=yes option with tsafs here about a week ago.  
To be honest, I'm not sure what to think about it.  Since enabling it, I get 
many more open file failures than I did before.  Does that mean /EnableGW=yes 
is bad, and shouldn't be used?  Or does it mean that it wasn't working 
previously either, but it just didn't know it, and wasn't reporting it

Ironically, the way that I got the least errors/problems of any kind was to run 
plain tsafs with no special options, and without OFM.We were previously 
having big problems with the OFM throwing our SAN controllers into diagnostic 
mode.  Not fun to have the server hba's ping-ponging back and forth across 
redundant controllers in the middle of a backup.


Troy Frank
Network Services
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation
608.829.5384

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/17/2005 9:01 AM 
Hello,

One of our Novell clients may be implementing the GroupWise-enabled
system (TSAFS) 

SV: Group-wise enabled TSAFS for backup

2005-05-19 Thread Hougaard.Flemming FHG
Hi Troy

Just stumbled over this document 
http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/tip/11295.html

Regards
Flemming

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Troy Frank
Sendt: 17. maj 2005 17:24
Til: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Emne: Re: Group-wise enabled TSAFS for backup


I started testing the /EnableGW=yes option with tsafs here about a week ago.  
To be honest, I'm not sure what to think about it.  Since enabling it, I get 
many more open file failures than I did before.  Does that mean /EnableGW=yes 
is bad, and shouldn't be used?  Or does it mean that it wasn't working 
previously either, but it just didn't know it, and wasn't reporting it

Ironically, the way that I got the least errors/problems of any kind was to run 
plain tsafs with no special options, and without OFM.We were previously 
having big problems with the OFM throwing our SAN controllers into diagnostic 
mode.  Not fun to have the server hba's ping-ponging back and forth across 
redundant controllers in the middle of a backup.


Troy Frank
Network Services
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation
608.829.5384

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/17/2005 9:01 AM 
Hello,

One of our Novell clients may be implementing the GroupWise-enabled
system (TSAFS) for backup

For those of you who use it have you had any problems with
backups or restores?

Thanks for any replies in advance

TSM V.5.3.1
Netware 6.5
TSM client 5.2.2 and 5.3.0

Confidentiality Notice follows:

The information in this message (and the documents attached to it, if any)
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for
the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If
you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken, or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in
error, please delete all electronic copies of this message (and the
documents attached to it, if any), destroy any hard copies you may have
created and notify me immediately by replying to this email. Thank you.




___
www.kmd.dk   www.kundenet.kmd.dk   www.eboks.dk   www.civitas.dk   
www.netborger.dk

Hvis du har modtaget denne mail ved en fejl vil jeg gerne, at du informerer mig 
og sletter den.
KMD skaber it-services, der fremmer effektivitet hos det offentlige, 
erhvervslivet og borgerne.

If you received this e-mail by mistake, please notify me and delete it. Thank 
you.
Our mission is to enhance the efficiency of the public sector and improve its 
service of the general public. 


SQL query for events

2005-05-19 Thread Elio Vannelli
Hello *SM users,
 
when I run
 
SELECT * from EVENTS
 
in an ODBC connection, TSM returns only records from last db backup. Is there a 
way to select records from a certain date (something like the query event 
statement from the command line)? Why the db backup erease entries in the 
events table?
Thanks in advance
 
Elio
 

 
This e-mail is from Wärtsilä Italia and it is intended only for the adressee. 
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information. If you receive 
this e-mail by mistake, please return it to Wärtsilä Italia without 
distributing or retaining copies thereof. Thank you.
 

 


Re: SQL query for events

2005-05-19 Thread Richard Sims
This is one of those areas which illustrates the difference between
TSM command processing and customer-accessible SQL tables...  The
Query EVent command actually reports from both the Events and Summary
tables, so the amount of data it displays differs from what you will
see in the Events table via a Select.
See IBM site Technotes 1110883 and 1114961 for just some of the
causes of absence of past events. (The Events table is much more
volatile than you may expect.) Search the IBM site with  +tsm +query
event +technote  for more insights.
   Richard Sims http://people.bu.edu/rbs
On May 19, 2005, at 6:49 AM, Elio Vannelli wrote:
Hello *SM users,
when I run
SELECT * from EVENTS
in an ODBC connection, TSM returns only records from last db
backup. Is there a way to select records from a certain date
(something like the query event statement from the command line)?
Why the db backup erease entries in the events table?


Re: Regarding TSM db and log mirroring

2005-05-19 Thread Richard Sims
On May 19, 2005, at 4:44 AM, Farren Minns wrote:
Hi all
I have a question regarding TSM database and log mirroring. I
already use
this approach but am unsure what the effects would be if we were to
lose
one of our disks ( i.e. one side of the mirror is broken ). How
does TSM
cope with this? Does it keep running? What are the steps required
to fix a
broken mirror etc?
Hi, Farren -
Now, what kind of enterprise product would TSM be if it didn't keep
running when a mirrored volume failed? :-)
Loss of a mirror is, unfortunately, very easy to miss, and is often
discovered only when the administrator happens to do Query DBVolume
or Query LOGVolume. Consider implementing server monitoring measures
to react to failure messages (ANR0203W, ANR0204W, ANR0205W, et al).
Recovery is documented in the Admin Guide topic Restoring Your
Server Using Mirrored Volumes.
   Richard Sims


Re: SQL query for events

2005-05-19 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Actually I am not aware of any real relationship between the QUERY EVENTS
command and the SUMMARY table. If anything, the SUMMARY table bears more
of a resemblance to the accounting records, if I recall correctly (it has
been a while since I looked at accounting records, though).

There isn't much difference between the columns displayed by selecting
from the EVENTS table versus those displayed using the QUERY EVENTS
command with the FORMAT=DETAILED option.

While updating a schedule will cause past events to go away, this is also
symptomatic of APARs IC34609 and IC28825. Go to http://www.ibm.com and
search on these APARs for the explanation.

Because the EVENTS table does not play well with date calculations, you
need to give it a boost by either explicitly coding your date ranges:

   ... where scheduled_start'2005-05-16' and scheduled_start'2005-05-18'
...

or by adding the following to your WHERE criteria when using calculated
dates:

   ... where scheduled_start'1900-01-01' ...

as in:

   select * from events -
  where scheduled_start'1900-01-01' and -
scheduled_startcurrent_timestamp - 2 days

if, say, you want to see EVENTS table data from 2 days ago to the present.

The ADSM-L archives contain prior discussion on this subject.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-05-19
05:26:29:

 This is one of those areas which illustrates the difference between
 TSM command processing and customer-accessible SQL tables...  The
 Query EVent command actually reports from both the Events and Summary
 tables, so the amount of data it displays differs from what you will
 see in the Events table via a Select.

 See IBM site Technotes 1110883 and 1114961 for just some of the
 causes of absence of past events. (The Events table is much more
 volatile than you may expect.) Search the IBM site with  +tsm +query
 event +technote  for more insights.

 Richard Sims http://people.bu.edu/rbs

 On May 19, 2005, at 6:49 AM, Elio Vannelli wrote:

  Hello *SM users,
 
  when I run
 
  SELECT * from EVENTS
 
  in an ODBC connection, TSM returns only records from last db
  backup. Is there a way to select records from a certain date
  (something like the query event statement from the command line)?
  Why the db backup erease entries in the events table?
 


Re: SV: Group-wise enabled TSAFS for backup

2005-05-19 Thread Troy Frank
Hi Flemming,

I looked over that coolsolutions article before implementing, and I read your 
previous email, but it's still pretty troubling.  The files getting missed 
appear to be user database files, not unimportant stuff.  Here's one little 
snippit from an operational report.  On this particular day, there were about 
25 other open files that were also user databases under /ofuser/.

NP-M4   2005-05-12 21:27'VOL1:/Apps/MFRCPO1/ofuser/USER0QF.DB'


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/19/2005 5:18 AM 
Hi Troy

Just stumbled over this document 
http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/tip/11295.html 

Regards
Flemming

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Troy Frank
Sendt: 17. maj 2005 17:24
Til: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 
Emne: Re: Group-wise enabled TSAFS for backup


I started testing the /EnableGW=yes option with tsafs here about a week ago.  
To be honest, I'm not sure what to think about it.  Since enabling it, I get 
many more open file failures than I did before.  Does that mean /EnableGW=yes 
is bad, and shouldn't be used?  Or does it mean that it wasn't working 
previously either, but it just didn't know it, and wasn't reporting it

Ironically, the way that I got the least errors/problems of any kind was to run 
plain tsafs with no special options, and without OFM.We were previously 
having big problems with the OFM throwing our SAN controllers into diagnostic 
mode.  Not fun to have the server hba's ping-ponging back and forth across 
redundant controllers in the middle of a backup.


Troy Frank
Network Services
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation
608.829.5384

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/17/2005 9:01 AM 
Hello,

One of our Novell clients may be implementing the GroupWise-enabled
system (TSAFS) for backup

For those of you who use it have you had any problems with
backups or restores?

Thanks for any replies in advance

TSM V.5.3.1
Netware 6.5
TSM client 5.2.2 and 5.3.0

Confidentiality Notice follows:

The information in this message (and the documents attached to it, if any)
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for
the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If
you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken, or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in
error, please delete all electronic copies of this message (and the
documents attached to it, if any), destroy any hard copies you may have
created and notify me immediately by replying to this email. Thank you.




___
www.kmd.dk   www.kundenet.kmd.dk   www.eboks.dk   www.civitas.dk   
www.netborger.dk 

Hvis du har modtaget denne mail ved en fejl vil jeg gerne, at du informerer mig 
og sletter den.
KMD skaber it-services, der fremmer effektivitet hos det offentlige, 
erhvervslivet og borgerne.

If you received this e-mail by mistake, please notify me and delete it. Thank 
you.
Our mission is to enhance the efficiency of the public sector and improve its 
service of the general public. 

Confidentiality Notice follows:

The information in this message (and the documents attached to it, if any)
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for
the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If
you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken, or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in
error, please delete all electronic copies of this message (and the
documents attached to it, if any), destroy any hard copies you may have
created and notify me immediately by replying to this email. Thank you.


Re: SQL query for events

2005-05-19 Thread Richard Sims
On May 19, 2005, at 8:58 AM, Andrew Raibeck wrote:
Actually I am not aware of any real relationship between the QUERY
EVENTS
command and the SUMMARY table. ...
Hi, Andy - My reference was IBM site Technote 1201780, which is a new
   Technote generally worth customer reading.
   Richard Sims


Restoreperformance 3590 versus 3592

2005-05-19 Thread Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH
Dear Group

We have a lot of Windows- and Novellmachines with Files counted between 2 Mio. 
and 7 Mio.
Restore from 3590 even with Filespacecollcation takes its time. On the Novell 
all files are on 1 volume (sic!).
Now we are looking for 3592 drives. Our IBM businesspartner (no streamin - no 
fun) means we speed up to 40MB/sec. even with data incremented for ever.
Restore, streamin, 40MB/sec. hmm
The 3590E keeps 40GB nativ, the 3592 keeps 300GB nativ, if both of them where 
same filled, the speed on 3592 is 5* faster buth the cap. is 7.5* more, do we 
realy get out this performance?
So the strong incremented (yes,yes progressiv backup) data from one node is on 
a 3592 spreaded over 300GB together with other clientdata (maybe groupcollo 
after 5.3.?).
Env. TSM Server 5.2.3.3 on Z/OS with most Windows and Novellclient on  5.2

any help appreciated

regards
Joachim



Joachim Paul Schaub
System Spezialist
IBM Certified Deployment Professional - Tivoli Storage Manager
Abraxas Informatik AG
Beckenhofstrasse 23
CH-8006 Zürich
Schweiz / Switzerland

Telefon: +41 (043) 259 34 41
Telefax: +41 (043) 259 42 82
E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.abraxas.ch

  Abraxas - Das Immer-besser-Prinzip
 http://www.abraxas.ch/DasImmerBesserPrinzip
~~~


backup issue caused by windows limitation

2005-05-19 Thread Rees, Chris (Corp)
Hi All

We are experiencing problems because of windows limitation.  In a
nutshell a file that has a full path longer that 256 characters cannot
be backed up / restored.  We have found this a problem with other
programs such as robocopy.

Has anyone out there found a work around for this.. I know this is a
long shot but thought I'd ask anyway..

Many Thanks

Chris



___ Disclaimer Notice 
This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read by 
those to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact us, delete the message from your computer and destroy any copies. Any 
distribution or copying without our prior permission is prohibited.

Internet communications are not always secure and therefore the E.ON Group does 
not accept legal responsibility for this message. The recipient is responsible 
for verifying its authenticity before acting on the contents. Any views or 
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of the E.ON Group. 
 
E.ON UK plc, Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park, Coventry, CV4 8LG.
Registered in England  Wales No. 2366970

E.ON UK Trading Ltd, Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park, Coventry, CV4 8LG
Registered in England  Wales No. 4178314

E.ON UK Trading Ltd is regulated by the Financial Services Authority to carry 
out investment activities. 

Telephone +44 (0) 2476 42 4000
Fax +44 (0) 2476 42 5432


Re: Regarding TSM db and log mirroring

2005-05-19 Thread Andy Huebner
Mr. Sims is correct, we had a disk array go down, all of our DB and log volume 
mirrors went away, TSM never missed a beat.  It only logged the event once per 
volume.  Recovery was almost as easy.

Andy Huebner

 -Original Message-
From:   ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of Richard 
Sims
Sent:   Thursday, May 19, 2005 7:39 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Regarding TSM db and log mirroring

On May 19, 2005, at 4:44 AM, Farren Minns wrote:

 Hi all

 I have a question regarding TSM database and log mirroring. I
 already use
 this approach but am unsure what the effects would be if we were to
 lose
 one of our disks ( i.e. one side of the mirror is broken ). How
 does TSM
 cope with this? Does it keep running? What are the steps required
 to fix a
 broken mirror etc?


Hi, Farren -

Now, what kind of enterprise product would TSM be if it didn't keep
running when a mirrored volume failed? :-)

Loss of a mirror is, unfortunately, very easy to miss, and is often
discovered only when the administrator happens to do Query DBVolume
or Query LOGVolume. Consider implementing server monitoring measures
to react to failure messages (ANR0203W, ANR0204W, ANR0205W, et al).

Recovery is documented in the Admin Guide topic Restoring Your
Server Using Mirrored Volumes.

Richard Sims


Re: backup issue caused by windows limitation

2005-05-19 Thread Thorneycroft, Doug
We usually have the user shorten the path. If that isn't possible, 
you can create a share point deeper into the directory structure 
and back it from there.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Rees, Chris (Corp)
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 6:37 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: backup issue caused by windows limitation


Hi All

We are experiencing problems because of windows limitation.  In a
nutshell a file that has a full path longer that 256 characters cannot
be backed up / restored.  We have found this a problem with other
programs such as robocopy.

Has anyone out there found a work around for this.. I know this is a
long shot but thought I'd ask anyway..

Many Thanks

Chris



___ Disclaimer Notice 
This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read by 
those to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact us, delete the message from your computer and destroy any copies. Any 
distribution or copying without our prior permission is prohibited.

Internet communications are not always secure and therefore the E.ON Group does 
not accept legal responsibility for this message. The recipient is responsible 
for verifying its authenticity before acting on the contents. Any views or 
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of the E.ON Group. 
 
E.ON UK plc, Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park, Coventry, CV4 8LG.
Registered in England  Wales No. 2366970

E.ON UK Trading Ltd, Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park, Coventry, CV4 8LG
Registered in England  Wales No. 4178314

E.ON UK Trading Ltd is regulated by the Financial Services Authority to carry 
out investment activities. 

Telephone +44 (0) 2476 42 4000
Fax +44 (0) 2476 42 5432


Re: SQL query for events

2005-05-19 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Hi Richard,

Thanks for the pointer to the article. I have asked that the content of
the cited article be re-reviewed for accuracy. I don't believe that
statement is correct.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-05-19
06:17:50:

 On May 19, 2005, at 8:58 AM, Andrew Raibeck wrote:

  Actually I am not aware of any real relationship between the QUERY
  EVENTS
  command and the SUMMARY table. ...
 

 Hi, Andy - My reference was IBM site Technote 1201780, which is a new
 Technote generally worth customer reading.

 Richard Sims


silo slots filling up quickly

2005-05-19 Thread Dave Zarnoch
Folks,

Unfortunately our library is running out of slots very quickly and we are
not
gaining many scratch tapes even though we are very aggressive with
reclamation.

I have been relocating tapes to an external rack giving the condition:

wherestatus=Full and days=120

However, the system has recently been asking for many of these
tapes to be inserted back into the library for reclamation.

Does anyone have any advice on which tapes that are the best to
remove from the active silo into a storage rack?

Thanks again!

DaveZ


Expiration / deletion of inactive files do not appear to be working for SQL-BACKTRACK

2005-05-19 Thread Lawrence Clark
Hi:
We've just discovered q peculiar problem with expiration involing the
SQL-BACKTRACK product and SYBASE and ORACLE databases. They do not
appear to be expiring.

The managment class rules are:

DOMAIN_NAME CLASS_NAME  VEREXISTS   VERDELETED  RETEXTRA
RETONLY DESTINATION
SPAIX   DBBKUP1 60  0   30  0   AIXDISKBACK

And a query backup /BACKTRACK:obackups.physical/*/* -inactive returns
a HUGE list of files that are inactive.
They should all have been deleted with the RETONLY set to 0.

Am I missing something?

A DB called SQL-BACKTRACK support and the responce was SQL-BACKTRACK
marked them inactive; at that point TSM
is not correctly removing them per the definitions.

Flat files in other management groups are behaving correctly.


API  5,242,880  B  10/15/03   02:54:53DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.15-10-2003.02:55:41-21544
API  5,242,880  B  11/15/03   02:59:13DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.15-11-2003.02:59:04-43356
API  5,242,880  B  12/15/02   02:55:59DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.15-12-2002.02:55:42-31662
API  5,242,880  B  12/15/03   02:50:43DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.15-12-2003.02:50:28-19182
API  5,242,880  B  01/16/03   03:03:22DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-01-2003.03:03:16-32618
API  5,242,880  B  01/16/04   02:57:23DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-01-2004.02:57:00-28874
API  5,242,880  B  02/16/03   02:48:22DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-02-2003.02:48:26-21274
API  5,242,880  B  02/16/04   02:48:41DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-02-2004.02:48:10-39458
API  5,242,880  B  03/16/03   02:50:47DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-03-2003.02:50:59-32472
API  5,242,880  B  03/16/04   02:54:33DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-03-2004.02:54:33-33320
API  5,242,880  B  04/16/03   03:04:45DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/10/2005 9:27:12 AM 
Mario,
   We've been using St. Bernard OFM 9 in conjuction with TSM 5.2.2
(client vers. of course) to backup both our GroupWise 6, and now
GroupWise 6.5 servers in the last year without problems. We've also done
successful restores of the GroupWise servers.


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/09/05 3:41 PM 

Hi list,

I need to perform an online backup of a Novell Groupwise environment
using
TSM ... does anybody knows how can I accomplish this ?

Thanks.

Mario



Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html


Re: Expiration / deletion of inactive files do not appear to be working for SQL-BACKTRACK

2005-05-19 Thread Thomas Denier
 Hi:
 We've just discovered q peculiar problem with expiration involing the
 SQL-BACKTRACK product and SYBASE and ORACLE databases. They do not
 appear to be expiring.

 The managment class rules are:

 DOMAIN_NAME CLASS_NAME VEREXISTS VERDELETED RETEXTRA RETONLY DESTINATION
 SPAIX DBBKUP1 60 0 30 0 AIXDISKBACK

 And a query backup /BACKTRACK:obackups.physical/*/* -inactive returns
 a HUGE list of files that are inactive.
 They should all have been deleted with the RETONLY set to 0.

 Am I missing something?

The -inactive option causes the query to list inactive files as well as
active files, not inactive files instead of active files. In the query
output line below, the 'A' after 'DBBKUP1' indicates that the file is
active. The rest of the query output lines in your original message
also showed active files. It is not clear that you have any inactive
backups of Oracle and Sybase data.

When our site had problems with SQL/BackTrack (we has since switched to
TDP), the most frequent cause was forgetting to specify 'backdelete=yes'
when registering nodes.

 A DB called SQL-BACKTRACK support and the responce was SQL-BACKTRACK
 marked them inactive; at that point TSM
 is not correctly removing them per the definitions.

 Flat files in other management groups are behaving correctly.


 API  5,242,880  B  10/15/03   02:54:53DBBKUP1 A
 /BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
 sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.15-10-2003.02:55:41-21544


select node_name,archive_mb from auditocc

2005-05-19 Thread Luc Beaudoin
Hi all

Is there a way to run that command ... plus be able to see each archives
sessions from each node


Is there a document for all the SELECT commands and options ...???

thanks

Luc


*URGENT* Windows OS Auditing

2005-05-19 Thread David Nicholson
Hi List,

I am seeing a tremendous and sudden increase in the amount of data
I am backing up from my Intel servers. The Intel folks tell me they
recently turned on O/S level Auditing of the DATA drive on almost all of
the Windows servers. I am wondering if this has resulted in TSM perceiving
all the data to have changed and he is therefore taking a full backup.

I am quickly running out of DB space and I'm beginning to panic (in a gin
and tonic kind of way)..

Can anybody comment?

Thanks in advance


Dave


Re: *URGENT* Windows OS Auditing

2005-05-19 Thread Prather, Wanda
You betcha.  Been there, done that (or had it done to me!)

A change in the auditing options appears to TSM like a permission
change.  And like any other type of file change; you'll get a backup of
the file (or all the files).

There is a parm you can put in dsm.opt:  SKIPNTPERMISSIONS YES

But I haven't found any way to work with it.
It tells TSM to ignore the NTFS permissions, but then it doesn't back
them up or restore them at all.

SO, unless you can rely STRICTLY on permission inheritance for ALL
subdirectories from the root, you gotta back the permissions up.

Go have that gin and tonic



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Nicholson
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 5:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: *URGENT* Windows OS Auditing


Hi List,

I am seeing a tremendous and sudden increase in the amount of
data
I am backing up from my Intel servers. The Intel folks tell me they
recently turned on O/S level Auditing of the DATA drive on almost all
of
the Windows servers. I am wondering if this has resulted in TSM
perceiving
all the data to have changed and he is therefore taking a full backup.

I am quickly running out of DB space and I'm beginning to panic (in a
gin
and tonic kind of way)..

Can anybody comment?

Thanks in advance


Dave


Paul H Hunt/UK/IBM is away from the office

2005-05-19 Thread Paul H Hunt
I will be out of the office starting  19/05/2005 and will not return until
23/05/2005.

I will have limited access to email and so will probably be slow in
responding to your message. If you need a response before next week, please
try [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Configuring multiple 3582 drives in one unit as 1 library

2005-05-19 Thread Rob Berendt
I have a 3582-L23 tape drive.  It has two fiber attached drives.  Both
drives are attached to my iSeries thru a 2109-F16 into two 5704 fiber
cards.
I want to configure this as a single media library to use in TSM as a Copy
Storage Pool.  I want to be able to do a
backup stg backuppool lto_3582
where backuppool is our current disk storage pool, and, lto_3582 is this
media library.  When it does this, I want it to write using both of the
drives in the 3582 at the same time.
I assume the steps are:
1 - Configure the 3582 using steps from the book IBM TotalStorage Ultrium
Tape Library 3582 Setup, Operator, and Service Guide.
2 - Hope the reboot of the 3582 autocreates a new TAPMLBxx on the iSeries.
 If not, configure that.
3 - In TSM, configure the copy storage pool to use this new media library.

One, is this possible?  Or can a single media library only use one drive
at a time?

tsm 5.2.2 for iSeries PASE.
os/400=V5R3M0

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com


Re: backup issue caused by windows limitation

2005-05-19 Thread TSM_User
First the version of RoboCopy that is part of the Windows 2003 resource kit 
now supports paths longer that 256 characters.

Second, TSM does support the backup and restoration of files in paths longer 
that 256 characters.

What errors are you getting?

Kyle

Rees, Chris (Corp) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All

We are experiencing problems because of windows limitation. In a
nutshell a file that has a full path longer that 256 characters cannot
be backed up / restored. We have found this a problem with other
programs such as robocopy.

Has anyone out there found a work around for this.. I know this is a
long shot but thought I'd ask anyway..

Many Thanks

Chris



___ Disclaimer Notice 
This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read by 
those to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact us, delete the message from your computer and destroy any copies. Any 
distribution or copying without our prior permission is prohibited.

Internet communications are not always secure and therefore the E.ON Group does 
not accept legal responsibility for this message. The recipient is responsible 
for verifying its authenticity before acting on the contents. Any views or 
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of the E.ON Group.

E.ON UK plc, Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park, Coventry, CV4 8LG.
Registered in England  Wales No. 2366970

E.ON UK Trading Ltd, Westwood Way, Westwood Business Park, Coventry, CV4 8LG
Registered in England  Wales No. 4178314

E.ON UK Trading Ltd is regulated by the Financial Services Authority to carry 
out investment activities.

Telephone +44 (0) 2476 42 4000
Fax +44 (0) 2476 42 5432


-
Yahoo! Mail
 Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour


Re: silo slots filling up quickly

2005-05-19 Thread Scott, Mark William
We have had a similar problem with a ATL library for our main frame
recently which we are currently upgrading.
The best carts to remove we found were carts that were 100% full or
close to this percentage and mark these carts as unavailable.
Cheers 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dave Zarnoch
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2005 11:26 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: silo slots filling up quickly

Folks,

Unfortunately our library is running out of slots very quickly and we
are
not
gaining many scratch tapes even though we are very aggressive with
reclamation.

I have been relocating tapes to an external rack giving the condition:

wherestatus=Full and days=120

However, the system has recently been asking for many of these
tapes to be inserted back into the library for reclamation.

Does anyone have any advice on which tapes that are the best to
remove from the active silo into a storage rack?

Thanks again!

DaveZ


Re: Node parameters

2005-05-19 Thread Sung Y Lee
While looking at this question I am observing something kinda of
interesting.
I notice that  for nodes tcp_name are in lower case for UNIX machines and
UPPER CASE for Windows platform when I issue this select statement:

select node_name,tcp_address,tcp_name,platform_name from nodes

The value for tcp_name does not appear to be depended on the
dsm.sys/dsm.opt.
Anyone else seeing samething I am seeing?

Sung Y. Lee



   
 Warren, Matthew  
 (Retail) 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  To
 OWERGEN.CO.UKADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Sent by: ADSM:cc
 Dist Stor 
 Manager  Subject
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Node parameters 
 .EDU 
   
   
 05/17/2005 11:58  
 AM
   
   
 Please respond to 
 ADSM: Dist Stor  
 Manager  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   .EDU   
   
   




Ahh, I see.

One is the information as presented from the client last time it
contacted TSM. (TCP/IP name / address)

The other is the information TSM will use when it attempts to contact
the client. (hl_address / ll_address)



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 3:28 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Node parameters

The distinction is host name versus [numeric] dotted IP address, e.g.,
TCP/IP name = storman, TCP/IP address = 11.23.62.232.

If the fields are blank, the client (for some reason) was unable to
determine the information to send to the server.

See the reference information for QUERY NODE for information about the
output fields. You can find this either in the Administrator's Reference
under the QUERY NODE command, or the administrative CLI's help facility
(HELP QUERY NODE).

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2005-05-17
03:16:23:

 Hallo *SM'ers,


 I can see that a node has an associated hl_address and ll_address, but
 what are the TCP/IP name' and 'TCP/IP address'  -  I know what a
tcp/ip
 name is, and what a tcpip address is,   but what is the distinction in
 meaning for TSM for these bits of information associated with the
 client?

 From the output below;

  Node Name: TAFF-0
   Platform: HPUX
Client OS Level: B.11.11
 Client Version: Version 5, Release 2, Level 3.0
 Policy Domain Name: DM_RMM_UNIX
  Last Access Date/Time: 05/17/05   10:46:06
 Days Since Last Access: 1
 Password Set Date/Time: 02/03/05   15:57:57
Days Since Password Set: 103
  Invalid Sign-on Count: 0
Locked?: No
Contact:
Compression: Client
Archive Delete Allowed?: Yes
 Backup Delete Allowed?: No
 Registration Date/Time: 03/24/03   20:05:12
  Registering Administrator: UNIXSCRIPT
 Last Communication Method Used: Tcp/Ip
Bytes Received Last Session: 21,847
Bytes Sent Last Session: 24,181
   Duration of Last Session: 423.74
Pct. Idle Wait Last Session: 62.72
   Pct. Comm. Wait Last Session: 97.66
   Pct. Media Wait Last Session: 3.94
  Optionset:
URL:
  Node Type: Client
 Password Expiration Period:
  Keep Mount Point?: No
   Maximum Mount Points Allowed: 24
 Auto Filespace Rename : No
  Validate Protocol: 

Re: backup issue caused by windows limitation

2005-05-19 Thread Markus Engelhard
Hi,

we had the problem backing up unc-shares. It turned out that the virus scan
was not able to scan the directories an thus TSM was not able to back them
up. TSM has no problem with directories with more than 256 characters (I´m
not sure where the limit is). Our tests were at TSM 5.1.6.0 Windows Client
W2K, TSM Server 5.1.7.0 on AIX 2 years ago.
We solved the problem by having users renaming directories and applying
stricter naming conventions.

Regards,
Markus Engelhard


--
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail
irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und
vernichten Sie diese E-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte
Weitergabe dieser Mail oder von Teilen dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.

Wir haben alle verkehrsüblichen Maßnahmen unternommen, um das Risiko der
Verbreitung virenbefallener Software oder E-Mails zu minimieren, dennoch
raten wir Ihnen, Ihre eigenen Virenkontrollen auf alle Anhänge an dieser
Nachricht durchzuführen. Wir schließen außer für den Fall von Vorsatz oder
grober Fahrlässigkeit die Haftung für jeglichen Verlust oder Schäden durch
virenbefallene Software oder E-Mails aus.

Jede von der Bank versendete E-Mail ist sorgfältig erstellt worden, dennoch
schließen wir die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit aus; sie kann nicht zu einer
irgendwie gearteten Verpflichtung zu Lasten der Bank ausgelegt werden.
__

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of  the material in this
e-mail or of parts hereof is strictly forbidden.

We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software
viruses but nevertheless advise you to carry out your own virus checks on
any attachment of this message. We accept no liability for loss or damage
caused by software viruses except in case of gross negligence or willful
behaviour.

Any e-mail messages from the Bank are sent in good faith, but shall not be
binding or construed as constituting any kind of obligation on the part of
the Bank.