ANR0418W and ACN5229E errors
Hello I have an old issue back when trying to backup via TDP for exchange 2010 version 6.1.3.2 got this following error on my actlog. 06/18/2013 12:41:10 ANR0418W Session 18024 for administrator EXCHSRVAN_DB (TDP MSExchg) is refused because an incorrect password was submitted. (SESSION: 18024) Same when trying the command: tdpexcc q exchange Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) Information ACN5229E Error obtaining VSS information from Local DSMAgent Node: 'exchsrva'. ANS1025E (RC137) Session rejected: Authentication failure I did: remove admin exchsrvan_db remove admin exchsrva register admin exchsrvan_db password passexp= register admin exchsrvapassword passexp= grant authority exchsrvan_db class=node authority=owner node=exchsrvan_db grant authority exchsrva class=node authority=owner node=exchsrva Stop and start the service again . Run the commands again and still got the error ! Running the command : tdpexcc q tsm is O.K c:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPExchangetdpexcc q tsm IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail: Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange Server Version 6, Release 1, Level 3.02 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1998, 2011. All rights reserved. Tivoli Storage Manager Server Connection Information Nodename ... EXCHSRVAN_DB NetWork Host Name of Server XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX TSM API Version Version 6, Release 4, Level 0.10 Server Name ADSM2 Server Type Windows Server Version . Version 6, Release 3, Level 3.100 Compression Mode ... Client Determined Domain Name DOCC Active Policy Set .. POCC Default Management Class ... MGEXCHANGE By the way when I restart the TSM Client Acceptor I notice that the Volume Shadow copy start too (Is on manual mode) , it's correct ? I am lost … Regards Robert
Re: ANR0418W and ACN5229E errors
Hi Robert, Make sure that the TSM Scheduler Service is running using a ID/password which is correct. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Robert Ouzen Sent: 18 June 2013 12:44 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] ANR0418W and ACN5229E errors Hello I have an old issue back when trying to backup via TDP for exchange 2010 version 6.1.3.2 got this following error on my actlog. 06/18/2013 12:41:10 ANR0418W Session 18024 for administrator EXCHSRVAN_DB (TDP MSExchg) is refused because an incorrect password was submitted. (SESSION: 18024) Same when trying the command: tdpexcc q exchange Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) Information ACN5229E Error obtaining VSS information from Local DSMAgent Node: 'exchsrva'. ANS1025E (RC137) Session rejected: Authentication failure I did: remove admin exchsrvan_db remove admin exchsrva register admin exchsrvan_db password passexp= register admin exchsrvapassword passexp= grant authority exchsrvan_db class=node authority=owner node=exchsrvan_db grant authority exchsrva class=node authority=owner node=exchsrva Stop and start the service again . Run the commands again and still got the error ! Running the command : tdpexcc q tsm is O.K c:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPExchangetdpexcc q tsm IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail: Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange Server Version 6, Release 1, Level 3.02 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1998, 2011. All rights reserved. Tivoli Storage Manager Server Connection Information Nodename ... EXCHSRVAN_DB NetWork Host Name of Server XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX TSM API Version Version 6, Release 4, Level 0.10 Server Name ADSM2 Server Type Windows Server Version . Version 6, Release 3, Level 3.100 Compression Mode ... Client Determined Domain Name DOCC Active Policy Set .. POCC Default Management Class ... MGEXCHANGE By the way when I restart the TSM Client Acceptor I notice that the Volume Shadow copy start too (Is on manual mode) , it's correct ? I am lost ... Regards Robert ** COMPUTACENTER PLC is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 03110569. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW COMPUTACENTER (UK) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 01584718. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW COMPUTACENTER (Mid-Market) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 3434654. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW COMPUTACENTER (FMS) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 3798091. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW The contents of this email are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive mail for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you receive it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. Computacenter information is available from: http://www.computacenter.com **
Re: tcp port usage of client
What is being asked for to do is to limit TSM client to a limited set of defined ports. They want to be able to run a utility to list ports used and by whom, save it, then run it later and compare them. So the goal is to limit the client to defined ports. To do this we need: - use:managedservices web schedule specifying: WEBPORTS 1501 1581 1501 = port for cad daemon tsm server contacting the client 1581 = web client agent service - is this just listening for gui access? this replaces httpport, and is no longer used with managedservices/webports If I do the above, then is my client ONLY using ports: 1501 - tsm server contacting the client, including the scheduler cad spawns 1581 - web client Is that even close to being right? Rick From: Erwann Simon erwann.si...@free.fr To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 06/17/2013 04:17 PM Subject:Re: tcp port usage of client Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Hi all, 1) Interactive If you're using the client in an interactive way (dsmc), it simply connects to the server TCPPORT (1500). 2) Schedmode Polling It's the same if using the SCHEDMODE POLLING option. No matter if the TSM Scheduler runs by his own or is launched by the CAD? 3) Schedmode Prompted If using the SCHEDMODE PROMPTED option, behavior depends on the way the TSM Scheduler is running. If TSM Scheduler is running by himself (dsmc sched), then the dsmc sched is listenning to the TCPCLIENTPORT (1501 by default, or another backup one 17xx if 1501 is already binded by another process. ANS1018E if TSM is using this port). If TSM Scheduler is managed by the CAD, it it listenning to a random port, unless you specify it by using the WEBPORTS option. -- Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي Erwann SIMON - Mail original - De: Wanda Prather wanda.prat...@icfi.com À: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Envoyé: Lundi 17 Juin 2013 20:31:07 Objet: Re: [ADSM-L] tcp port usage of client Plus, I believe a client in polling mode uses 1500, a client in prompted mode uses both 1500 and 1501, unless 1501 isn't available then it will pick something else. Is that wrong? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee, Gary Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 2:27 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] tcp port usage of client Your analysis looks correct to me. Ports for the CAD are specified with the webport option. Only valid if managedservices is used with the schedule option. Managedservices schedule I believe the httpport option is only used if you have Managedservices web Or managedservices web schedule The random ports for dsmcad I believe are when webport is not specified. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Richard Rhodes Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 2:19 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] tcp port usage of client Hi Everyone, I am SO confused . . . The security folks are checking/verifying what tcp ports are used on some servers. We got the question of just what ports TSM clients are using on these servers. The clients are all behind a firewall, but the question is not about firewall port. Rather it's just what ports these TSM clients are using. Client backups run just fine thru the firewall. Clients are all AIX. The TSM server the clients backup to runs on tcpport 1500 (default). The dsm.opt is empty. Here is the dsm.sys file on one of the AIX clients. SErvername tsmX COMMmethod TCPIP TCPPort1500 TCPServeraddress tsmX nodename clientY passwordaccess generate inclexcl /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/inclexcl schedlogname /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmsched.log webports 2123 2124 httpport 1581 1582 schedlogret5 errorlogname /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmerror.log errorlogret5 txnbytelimit 25600 tcpwindowsize 64 schedmode prompted tcpbuf 64 resourceutilization 3 This seems messed up: - has two entries on httpport which is invalid, not sure what result of this is. - webports is specified, but is not using managedservcies. I thought this options only applied if using managedservices with the scheduler running under cad. - Since scheduler is running directly (not under cad), there is no tcpclientport parm, so this is defaulting to 1501 (I think). This is the port the tsm server uses to prompt the client. - How does a webports and httport (that is bad) interact? WIth all that, what tcp ports would a client like this be using? I come up with this: 1501 (dsmsched listening for prompt from TSM server) 1581 (http connection for web gui via dsmcad) 2123/2124 ? - no, parm is ignored 1582 ? - no, invalid 2nd port on httpport random ? -
Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be
Hi Wanda, This indeed sounds puzzling. The only thing I can think of -- and admittedly this is a shot in the dark based on your description -- is if LAN-free is enabled for the backup server, in which case the data would be served from tape. - Andy Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead | stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links: Product support: http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager Online documentation: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli Documentation Central/page/Tivoli Storage Manager Product Wiki: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli +Storage+Manager/page/Home ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 2013-06-17 21:45:04: From: Prather, Wanda wanda.prat...@icfi.com To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, Date: 2013-06-17 21:45 Subject: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu TSM 6.2.3 Backup done with TSM VE 6.4.0.0 and TSM client 6.4.0.0. VMCTLMC points to a dedicated sequential pool on fast disk. That pool has no NEXTSTGPOOL defined. VMMC points backup data to a deduplicated sequential pool on fast disk storage. After the server dedups it there, it migrates to a slower NAS-based deduplicated storage pool on disk. When that slower pool fills, data migrates out to tape. DEDUPREQUIRESBACKUP set to YES. (No client-side dedup used.) We have done full VM restores through the plug-in and file-level restores through the recovery agent in the past, including testing restores from tape, with no problems. Now one of the customer's VM datastores has met with an unfortunate accident in a dark alley. We need to restore 7 full VM's. From the dsmc command line, restore vm victim1 datastore=newhealthyone starts up OK, but was calling for a zillion tape mounts, and therefore was restoring at the rate of about 4GB per 24 hours. So, we did MOVE NODEDATA DCNAME FILESPACE=victim1 to bring the data from the tape back to the sequential disk pool. Cranked up again, same result - requesting a zillion tape mounts. So riddle me this: If the control information is on disk, and the filespace is back on disk, what are the tape mounts going after? (FWIW, tried upgrading VE to 6.4.0.1 and data mover to 6.4.0.4, no difference.) Signed, Confused by VE. Again. Wanda Prather | Senior Technical Specialist | wanda.prat...@icfi.com | www.icfi.com ICF International | 401 E. Pratt St, Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 | 410.539.1135 (o)
TSM 6.3 - Cluster - Windows 2008
Hi, I need to setup a TSM 6.3 in a Windows Cluster Environment and my doubt is: After install the TSM Server 6.3 in the primary node, created the cluster group, initialized the instance. Do I need to failover and run the Instance Setup again or just include on the primary machine the TSM Server Service on resource group? Thanks,
I could scream!
Way back when we had 1 TSM server at v5.x, we asked IBM several times if there was a way to migrate a TSM server to a different platform (AIX -- Linux) and they said no. So we came up with a strategy to install a 2nd TSM server (Linux) at our alternate site and then have all local clients backup to it and then replicate to the main TSM server at our primary site (AIX). All local clients at primary site will do the same, backup to AIX server and then replicate to Linux server. Once both servers have full copies of each other's data, we will change all replicated nodes on the linux server to regular nodes and change all remote nodes to then backup to the linux server. Afterwards the AIX server would be phased out and a new Linux server would be created and the whole process reversed. Basically the goal was to get rid of the TSM AIX server and move to linux only since AIX hardware is much more expensive. So now with version 6.3.4, there is a way to migrate from an AIX 5.x server to a Linux x86_64 server which would have solved our problems. . Where was this years ago? Of course now we have 2 v6 servers and I am in the middle of the process described above. Being able to move from AIX 5.x to Linux 6.3.4 would have been the solution we were looking for but now it's too late. Sorry for my rant but this would have saved me a year's worth of work, at least.
Re: tcp port usage of client
I'm sorry to post a long winded confusing post. I'm tempted to open a case with IBM, but I know I'll just get someone who will just quote the manual and not answer my questions. . . . anyway . . . Here is my understanding and questions about client ports at this time (completely subject to change and probably wrong!). 1) Using old way - dsmcad for web client and dsmc sched for scheduler = dsmcad dsmcad controls the web client, which is dsmagent. you never start dsmagent by itself - it's always started through dsmcad httpport controls which port dsmcad listens on httpport defaults to 1581 In use: dsmcad listens on 1581 you browse to http://client:1581 dsmcad spawns dsmagent which talks to your browser you use the web client over httpport You can change httpport to something else. = dsmc sched (promtped mode) runs as a separate process uses tsmclientport for port to listen on for being contacted by the TSM server tcpclientport defaults to 1501 First time you start the scheduler it does this: contacts the TSm server and tells it the port it is listening on tsm server then prompts the client at that port You can change tcpclientport to any port you want. 2) Using managedservices scheduler webclient point: Nothing says that httpport and tcpclientport DONT work with managedservices. Nothing says that webports is specific to managedservices. Nothing relates how httpport/tcpclientport interacts with webports. = dsmcad dsmcad now handles both the scheduler and web client You never start dsmagent by yourself You can start dsmc sched manually, but you are letting dsmcad handle it for you. web client handles the web client just like before. listens for browsers on httpport with dflt 1581 Spawns dsmagent you use the web client over httpport You can change the port by changing httpport scheduler When cad first starts it (or the scheduler it starts) contacts the tsm server and reports the port it listens on. Listening port is tcpclientport which defaults to 1581. TSM Server prompts to client tcpclientport where dsmcad is listening and starts the scheduler. 3) QUESTIONS about webports option WEBPORTS - I thought this option was limited to when running managedservuces, but I can't find anything in the BA client manual or IBM's web site that states this. I don't know why I thought this. - The BA client manual doesn't say how this option effects running separate scheduler/dsmcad or running managedservers for both. - It explains nothing on how the webports ports you enter relate to httpport and tcpclientport. webports cadport agentport cadport = cad daemon port, dflt=0 which is a random port agentport = web client agent service port, dflt=0 which is a random port Does tcpclientport = cadport? Does httpport = agentport? What is the web client agent service? Is this just a thread in dsmcad to spawn dsmagent? Is this dsmagent itself? If you specify both webports and tcpclientport/httpport, what does it do? How do they interact? It seems httpport can't = agentport, because if it can be a random number then how do you know what port to set your browser to? - The docs simply do not explain what the webports port parms are for. If I have httpport=1581 and tcpclientport=1501, then what/why would webports even be needed? Why would it use two random ports for? I'm beginning to think webports are actually some internal communication ports used between dsmcad and the scheduler, dsmagent, threads, something else? If anyone truly understand the webports option, I'd love to here about it - The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be
Thanks Andy, but there is no lan-free anywhere in the environment. W -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:43 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be Hi Wanda, This indeed sounds puzzling. The only thing I can think of -- and admittedly this is a shot in the dark based on your description -- is if LAN-free is enabled for the backup server, in which case the data would be served from tape. - Andy Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead | stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links: Product support: http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager Online documentation: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli Documentation Central/page/Tivoli Storage Manager Product Wiki: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli +Storage+Manager/page/Home ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 2013-06-17 21:45:04: From: Prather, Wanda wanda.prat...@icfi.com To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, Date: 2013-06-17 21:45 Subject: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu TSM 6.2.3 Backup done with TSM VE 6.4.0.0 and TSM client 6.4.0.0. VMCTLMC points to a dedicated sequential pool on fast disk. That pool has no NEXTSTGPOOL defined. VMMC points backup data to a deduplicated sequential pool on fast disk storage. After the server dedups it there, it migrates to a slower NAS-based deduplicated storage pool on disk. When that slower pool fills, data migrates out to tape. DEDUPREQUIRESBACKUP set to YES. (No client-side dedup used.) We have done full VM restores through the plug-in and file-level restores through the recovery agent in the past, including testing restores from tape, with no problems. Now one of the customer's VM datastores has met with an unfortunate accident in a dark alley. We need to restore 7 full VM's. From the dsmc command line, restore vm victim1 datastore=newhealthyone starts up OK, but was calling for a zillion tape mounts, and therefore was restoring at the rate of about 4GB per 24 hours. So, we did MOVE NODEDATA DCNAME FILESPACE=victim1 to bring the data from the tape back to the sequential disk pool. Cranked up again, same result - requesting a zillion tape mounts. So riddle me this: If the control information is on disk, and the filespace is back on disk, what are the tape mounts going after? (FWIW, tried upgrading VE to 6.4.0.1 and data mover to 6.4.0.4, no difference.) Signed, Confused by VE. Again. Wanda Prather | Senior Technical Specialist | wanda.prat...@icfi.com | www.icfi.com ICF International | 401 E. Pratt St, Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 | 410.539.1135 (o)
Re: Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be
Are the mounts coming from the NEXTSTGP of the slow disk? If so, I wonder if the algorithm is to restore from non-dedupe storage first. Would possibly make sense if both were disk, but... STEPHEN STACKWICK | Senior Consultant | 301.518.6352 (m) | stephen.stackw...@icfi.com | icfi.com ICF INTERNATIONAL | 410 E. Pratt Street Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 | 410.539.1135 (o) -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 9:45 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Another VE mystery - restoring from tape - but shouldn't be TSM 6.2.3 Backup done with TSM VE 6.4.0.0 and TSM client 6.4.0.0. VMCTLMC points to a dedicated sequential pool on fast disk. That pool has no NEXTSTGPOOL defined. VMMC points backup data to a deduplicated sequential pool on fast disk storage. After the server dedups it there, it migrates to a slower NAS-based deduplicated storage pool on disk. When that slower pool fills, data migrates out to tape. DEDUPREQUIRESBACKUP set to YES. (No client-side dedup used.) We have done full VM restores through the plug-in and file-level restores through the recovery agent in the past, including testing restores from tape, with no problems. Now one of the customer's VM datastores has met with an unfortunate accident in a dark alley. We need to restore 7 full VM's. From the dsmc command line, restore vm victim1 datastore=newhealthyone starts up OK, but was calling for a zillion tape mounts, and therefore was restoring at the rate of about 4GB per 24 hours. So, we did MOVE NODEDATA DCNAME FILESPACE=victim1 to bring the data from the tape back to the sequential disk pool. Cranked up again, same result - requesting a zillion tape mounts. So riddle me this: If the control information is on disk, and the filespace is back on disk, what are the tape mounts going after? (FWIW, tried upgrading VE to 6.4.0.1 and data mover to 6.4.0.4, no difference.) Signed, Confused by VE. Again. Wanda Prather | Senior Technical Specialist | wanda.prat...@icfi.com | www.icfi.com ICF International | 401 E. Pratt St, Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202 | 410.539.1135 (o)
Re: ANR0418W and ACN5229E errors
Hi Robert, It seems something else is out of sync. Instead of just resetting the admin nodes, you could update the password for the actual nodes as well and make sure you can connect to the TSM Server from DP/Exchange and the BA Client separately. After that, stop the CAD and AGENT and restart the CAD, to make sure it starts cleanly and that you do not get any warnings in the TSM Server activity log. After that, try the tdpexcc q exchange command again. If you still see the same problem, open a PMR, and the service team can walk you through the steps to get this working again. Thanks, Del ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 06/18/2013 06:43:43 AM: From: Robert Ouzen rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, Date: 06/18/2013 06:44 AM Subject: ANR0418W and ACN5229E errors Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Hello I have an old issue back when trying to backup via TDP for exchange 2010 version 6.1.3.2 got this following error on my actlog. 06/18/2013 12:41:10 ANR0418W Session 18024 for administrator EXCHSRVAN_DB (TDP MSExchg) is refused because an incorrect password was submitted. (SESSION: 18024) Same when trying the command: tdpexcc q exchange Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) Information ACN5229E Error obtaining VSS information from Local DSMAgent Node: 'exchsrva'. ANS1025E (RC137) Session rejected: Authentication failure I did: remove admin exchsrvan_db remove admin exchsrva register admin exchsrvan_db password passexp= register admin exchsrvapassword passexp= grant authority exchsrvan_db class=node authority=owner node=exchsrvan_db grant authority exchsrva class=node authority=owner node=exchsrva Stop and start the service again . Run the commands again and still got the error ! Running the command : tdpexcc q tsm is O.K c:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPExchangetdpexcc q tsm IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail: Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange Server Version 6, Release 1, Level 3.02 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1998, 2011. All rights reserved. Tivoli Storage Manager Server Connection Information Nodename ... EXCHSRVAN_DB NetWork Host Name of Server XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX TSM API Version Version 6, Release 4, Level 0.10 Server Name ADSM2 Server Type Windows Server Version . Version 6, Release 3, Level 3.100 Compression Mode ... Client Determined Domain Name DOCC Active Policy Set .. POCC Default Management Class ... MGEXCHANGE By the way when I restart the TSM Client Acceptor I notice that the Volume Shadow copy start too (Is on manual mode) , it's correct ? I am lost … Regards Robert
SV: TSM 6.3 - Cluster - Windows 2008
If I where you, should I look at DB2 HADR Cluster. If you want to run as you thinking, then should you run the Wizard one more time. But I'm guessing you will get a DB2 Keyring issue when you are failing over. /Christian -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Fernando Florentino [mailto:fernando.florent...@gmail.com] Skickat: den 18 juni 2013 15:55 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: TSM 6.3 - Cluster - Windows 2008 Hi, I need to setup a TSM 6.3 in a Windows Cluster Environment and my doubt is: After install the TSM Server 6.3 in the primary node, created the cluster group, initialized the instance. Do I need to failover and run the Instance Setup again or just include on the primary machine the TSM Server Service on resource group? Thanks,
TSM for ARM CPUs
Hi Everyone, Has anything try to get TSM BA Client working on a Linux Server based on an ARM Processor CPU? Best Regards / Med vänlig hälsning Christian Svensson
