Re: DBI Connections to TSM database
I'm working on a DBI::TSM driver, maybe one day ...
rv
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Andy Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoyé : jeudi 7 juin 2001 17:26
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: DBI Connections to TSM database
>
>
> Ah, now I see... sorry Mark, I think I missed your real point
> from your
> original post.
>
> That being the case, it is not possible to do what you want;
> there is no
> way to access the TSM database outside of the Admin client or the ODBC
> driver (which is only on Windows).
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy
>
> Andy Raibeck
> IBM Tivoli Systems
> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked."
> "The command line is your friend"
>
>
> "Mark A. Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on
> 06/07/2001
> 08:09:53 AM
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: DBI Connections to TSM database
>
>
> I really need this to run on an AIX platform.
>
> Mark Adams
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of
> Andy Raibeck
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: DBI Connections to TSM database
>
>
> We do not test our ODBC driver with Perl, so there is no
> guarantee that it
> will work. However, unofficially, at least some aspects of it
> will work...
> with the correct Perl setup.
>
> Go to http://www.adsm.org and do a search using this criteria:
>
>+perl +odbc +raibeck
>
> You will find an informative post from Mr. Gerhard Rentschler
> describing
> how he was able to use Dave Roth's Win32:ODBC module to get a
> simple SELECT
> statement to work in Perl.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy
>
> Andy Raibeck
> IBM Tivoli Systems
> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked."
> "The command line is your friend"
>
>
> "Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 06/07/2001
> 06:06:10 AM
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: DBI Connections to TSM database
>
>
> Hi Mark
>
> It's normal ! TSM DB is not a DB2 one. It is based on B-tree and
> I've already tried to write a DBI::TSM driver. 99% of the job is
> done but one out of 10 commands in the ODBC connection procedure
> is different fro TSM. So I could not achieve my work.
>
> When I have more time, I will ask a ODBC guru to help me to finish
> my driver. At this time, if your admin box is NT, just install ODBC
> and try to connect using this... But I did not manage to either using
> PERL / PHP.
>
> Keep in touch
>
> rv
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Mark A. Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Envoyé : mercredi 6 juin 2001 22:43
> > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Objet : DBI Connections to TSM database
> >
> >
> > I am running AIX 4.3.3.x with version 3.7.4 TSM.
> > I need to connect to the TSM database using perl, using the
> > DBI and the
> > DBD::DB2 module.
> > I am having trouble connecting to the database. Could anyone
> > give me a hand.
> >
> > CODE
> > #!/usr/local/bin/perl
> >
> > use DBI;
> > use DBD::DB2::Constants;
> > use DBD::DB2;
> >
> > $db = DBI->connect("dbi:DB2:adsmsrv1", user, password);
> > if (!defined($db)) {
> > print "Error connecting to server1 \n";
> > #print "Error: " . DBD::DB2::Error(). "\n";
> > exit(1);
> > }
> > exit(0);
> > ##
> >
> > This is the error I am getting.
> > DBI->connect(adsmsrv1) failed: Total Environment allocation
> > failure! Did
> > you set up your DB2 client environment? at ./first.pl line 7
> > Error connecting to server1
> > #
> >
> > Does any one have any ideas or could help me out?
> >
> > Mark Adams
> > Systems Programmer
> > CSG Systems, Inc.
> >
>
>
>
Re: DBI Connections to TSM database
Hi Mark
It's normal ! TSM DB is not a DB2 one. It is based on B-tree and
I've already tried to write a DBI::TSM driver. 99% of the job is
done but one out of 10 commands in the ODBC connection procedure
is different fro TSM. So I could not achieve my work.
When I have more time, I will ask a ODBC guru to help me to finish
my driver. At this time, if your admin box is NT, just install ODBC
and try to connect using this... But I did not manage to either using
PERL / PHP.
Keep in touch
rv
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Mark A. Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoyé : mercredi 6 juin 2001 22:43
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : DBI Connections to TSM database
>
>
> I am running AIX 4.3.3.x with version 3.7.4 TSM.
> I need to connect to the TSM database using perl, using the
> DBI and the
> DBD::DB2 module.
> I am having trouble connecting to the database. Could anyone
> give me a hand.
>
> CODE
> #!/usr/local/bin/perl
>
> use DBI;
> use DBD::DB2::Constants;
> use DBD::DB2;
>
> $db = DBI->connect("dbi:DB2:adsmsrv1", user, password);
> if (!defined($db)) {
> print "Error connecting to server1 \n";
> #print "Error: " . DBD::DB2::Error(). "\n";
> exit(1);
> }
> exit(0);
> ##
>
> This is the error I am getting.
> DBI->connect(adsmsrv1) failed: Total Environment allocation
> failure! Did
> you set up your DB2 client environment? at ./first.pl line 7
> Error connecting to server1
> #
>
> Does any one have any ideas or could help me out?
>
> Mark Adams
> Systems Programmer
> CSG Systems, Inc.
>
Re: DB errors
Hi Long, seems you told TSM to automatically create new DB/LOG volumes when needed. The partition / filespace you specified for 'automatic expansion' is FULL ! 2 tips : - manually dsmfmt a DB / LOG volume and add them with def dbvol/logvol + extend db/log - clean up your FS / drive specified for automatic extension (should be specified in dsmserv.opt) good luck rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Long Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 6 juin 2001 15:07 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : DB errors > > > Anyone familiar with the following errors? > > ANR7860W Insufficient Space Available for file > /apps/adsm/db/D6838281.DBV. > ANR4430W Unable to Define Data Base Volume /apps/adsm/db/D6838281.DBV. > ANR4415I Data Base and Recovery Log Space Expansion Completed. > ANR4414I Data Base Space expansion Is Needed, 2360 Megabytes needed. > ANR4412I Data Base and Recovery Log Space expansion triggered. > ANR4428W One or more Data Base Volumes differs in number of > copy volumes. > > These errors happens a lot when I do a "q act", the last one ANR4428W > repeats more than the others. > Any ideas?? > > Long > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com >
Re: Slow NT Restore
Hi Phil, - what do you see in a 'q node XXX f=d 'in the lines '% xxx Wait Last Session' ? - Have you ever had good restore rates with your TSM server ? - what are your TCPxxx client params (in dsm.opt) ? - How much RAM does your AIX box have and how much is allocated for network buffers ? (no -a) rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Phil Stockton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 31 mai 2001 12:23 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Slow NT Restore > > > Hi > > We are trying to restore the C drive on a NT server 4.0 > Service Pack 5. We > have TCPIP 100 mb full duplex. The client is 3.1.0.8 and the > server is > 3.1.2.90 on AIX 4.3.2. > > We are observing very slow restore times. There is no > waiting for tape > mounts but when I query sessions wait times of some seconds > are observed, > almost as if it restores one file then goes off to do something else. > > So far it has taken 20 hours to restore 850mb. All > directories are held on > disk and they have been restored. > > Anyone got any ideas on how to speed this up, by a factor of 10 or so. > > Regards > > Phil Stockton > > RS Components Ltd > Corby > Northants > > > > *** > The contents of this Email and any files transmitted with it > are confidential and intended solely for the use of the > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. The views stated > herein do not necessarily represent the view of the company. > If you are not the intended recipient of this Email you may not > copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it > in any form whatsoever. If you have received this mail in > error please Email the sender. > *** > > RS Components Ltd. >
Re: 4.1.2.0 on Solaris 2.6/2.7
Hi Steven some one posted a workaround some days ago : remove /etc/adsm and try again rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Steven P Roder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 22 mai 2001 15:56 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : 4.1.2.0 on Solaris 2.6/2.7 > > > Hi All, > > Has anyone successfully used the GUI tool, DSM, of the > 4.1.2.0 client > under Solaris 2.6 or 2.7? Under my test 2.6 machine here, > the segfaults > right away, and under 2.7, it dies when changing windows, > somtimes when it > needs to ask for the destination, and sometimes after selecting the > destination: > > X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) > Major opcode of failed request: 2 (X_ChangeWindowAttributes) > Resource id in failed request: 0xa800430 > Serial number of failed request: 148302 > Current serial number in output stream: 148316 > > Yuk. Anyone using 4.1.2.0 under solaris? > > Thanks, > > Steve Roder, University at Buffalo > HOD Service Coordinator > VM Systems Programmer > UNIX Systems Administrator (Solaris and AIX) > TSM/ADSM Administrator > ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | (716)645-3564 | http://ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu/~tkssteve)
Re: Dr Watson while installing TSM on NT 4.0
Hi Kevin, Have you installed some stuff on your NT box before TSM ? Re-apply your latest SP and try again. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Kevin M Wisneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 21 mai 2001 15:57 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Dr Watson while installing TSM on NT 4.0 > > > I am installing TSM through the silent install on some NT 4.0 > servers and I keep > getting a DR. Watson on the msiexec.exefrom Microsoft. > It doesn't seem to > affect anything, if I hit OK on the alert, the install > continues and there > doesn't seem to be any ill effect. Has anyone else seen this > problem??If > so, what did you do to resolve it?? > > Thanks > > > Kevin Wisneski > Citigroup > Hartford, CT 860-277-3157 >
Re: dsmc incremental terminated with error on AIX
Hi Clemens, upgrade your server first to 3.1.2.90 before posting this. I'm afraid people won't spend much time to help an these prehistoric version. Good luck rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Block, Clemens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 21 mai 2001 14:07 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : dsmc incremental terminated with error on AIX > > > Hello! > > I get the follwing output when I start an incremental Backup session > on the machine. The actlog on the server only reports entries > for terminated > sessions. Thats's true. After the error the dsmc cut off and > create a core. > > --->snip > # dsmc > Tivoli Storage Manager > Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 4, Release 1, Level 2.0 > (C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2000, All Rights Reserved. > > tsm> incremental > Node Name: HELENE > Session established with server DUESENTRIEB: AIX-RS/6000 > Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.16 > Server date/time: 21.05.2001 11:35:42 Last access: > 21.05.2001 11:25:11 > > The assert subroutine failed: poolP->incSize > 0, file > mempool.cpp, line 719 > IOT/Abort trap > --->snip > > Any Idea what is wrong with the System. > Thanks in advance for any responses > > Some more Informations for you: > > Last week we installed a second oracle 8.1.7 db on the > machine (which use > raw devices) and made a databse migration from the running > oracle 7.3.4 > stanby databse to the new 8.1.7. To enable AIO it was > necessary to install > the ML 8 patches on the existing AIX 4.3.3 ML 6. > Backups using the api with oracle RMAN are working well at the moment. > Before the last week changes we made backups without any problem. At > this time the standby 7.3.4 db and the prior installed 8.1.7 db were > already > running. > > To prevent comments in conjunction with the Client/Server Versions: > * Yes I know Server Release 3.1.16 is out of service. > * Yes I know Client Version 4.1.2 is unsupported with server > version 3.1.xxx > * There is no way at the moment tu update the server. > * We need the new Client Version, because we need a stable RMAN backup > * The combination 4.1.2 Client with 3.1.16 Server is working > well on other > Systems > > > I'm really looking forward to your hints > Regards > Clemens > > Sorry, one more question. Can anybody tell me where to find > patch releases > for the 3.1 Server version? They are no more present on the > IBM. servers >
Re: Global Exclude
Fred, CLOPTSETs are SERVER SIDE filters. The guys who install TSM client on desktop do not need to know if you have filters or not. I don't understand your pb. I see two solutions 1) you define a huge CLOPTSET for all your platforms (NT,UNIXes, Mac) and all your nodes are attached to this cloptset. Only mathing rules for the concerned platform will be applied, but processing time will be longer... 2) you define a CLOPTSET for each platform (like me). Processing time will be short. Moreover if you user the flag FORCE=YES, your server rules will override those potentially defined by your install-guys / users. Sen me offline of this list, your INCLEXCL lists ... rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Fred Johanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 18 mai 2001 22:53 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: Global Exclude > > > Herve, > > Your list is similar to the one I distribute. The > problem is that > the people who install the clients ignore it, even when it's > in the same > folder as the client code on our distribution machine. Over > a thousand of > my 1500+ clients are Windows or Mac desktops, and half or more have > incomplete inclexcl lists. I can have someone write some > code that will > build a CLOPTSET that contains my minimum list and attaches it to all > appropriate clients as well as updating all existing > CLOPTSETs to include > my list. But if there is another way to do it, a central list that > defaults for the entire system, I'd rather go with that. > > > At 09:49 AM 5/18/2001 +0200, you wrote: > >Hi Fred, > > > >here is my CLOPTSET for all these annoying stuff ... > > > >rv > > > > > > > > > -Message d'origine- > > > De : Fred Johanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Envoyé : jeudi 17 mai 2001 19:41 > > > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Objet : Global Exclude > > > > > > > > > I find an awful amount of storage is filled with Internet > > > Cache and Temp > > > files. I frequently post to my users what the minimum > > > include-exclude list > > > should be, but it is usually ignored. Short of creating an > > > optionset with > > > the proper exclude statements and editing all the existing > > > ones, there are > > > more than 1500 clients out there, is there any way to keep > > > this stuff out > > > of backups? > > > > > >
Re: Global Exclude
Hi Fred, here is my CLOPTSET for all these annoying stuff ... rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Fred Johanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 17 mai 2001 19:41 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Global Exclude > > > I find an awful amount of storage is filled with Internet > Cache and Temp > files. I frequently post to my users what the minimum > include-exclude list > should be, but it is usually ignored. Short of creating an > optionset with > the proper exclude statements and editing all the existing > ones, there are > more than 1500 clients out there, is there any way to keep > this stuff out > of backups? > /***/ /* WINDOWS DESKTOP */ /***/ DEF CLO WIN_DESKTOP DESC="Exclude list for customers desktops/laptops" DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP COMPRESSALWAYS 'NO' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\ffastun*.ff?' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir "*:\...\Temporary Internet Files"' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir *:\...\Cache' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir "*:\Documents and Settings\*\Local Settings\Temp"' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir "*:\Documents and Settings\*\Local Settings\Historique"' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude "*:\Documents And Settings\...\NT*.DAT*"' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude "*:\Documents And Settings\...\USR*.DAT*"' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\...\MSCREATE.DIR' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\PAGEFILE.SYS' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir *:\RECYCLE?' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\HIBERFIL.SYS' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude "*:\...\EA DATA. SF"' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\...\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\*' DEF CLIENTO WIN_DESKTOP INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir *:\...\temp' /***/ /* WINDOWS SERVERS */ /***/ DEF CLO WIN_SERVER DESC="Exclude list for servers" DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER COMPRESSALWAYS 'NO' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\...\MSCREATE.DIR' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\PAGEFILE.SYS' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir *:\RECYCLE?' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\...\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\*' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir *:\I386' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir *:\...\system32\wins' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir *:\...\temp' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir *:\...\urlcache' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir *:\...\Inetpub\Catalog.wci' /**/ /* Win2K specific */ /**/ DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir "*:\SYSTEM VOLUME INFORMATION"' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir "*:\...\Driver Cache"' // /* %SYSTEMROOT specific */ // DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\WINNT\...\PERFLIB*.DAT' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\WINNT\SYSTEM32\DTCLOG\MSDTC.LOG' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\WINNT\NETLOGON.CHG' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\WINNT\SCHEDLGU.TXT' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude *:\WINNT\csc\...\*' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude "*:\WINNT\REGISTARTION\*.CLB\...\*.CRMLOG"' DEF CLIENTO WIN_SERVER INCLEXCL 'Exclude.dir *:\WINNT\$NT*' Exclude "*:\...\NTFRS\JET\...\*" Exclude "*:\...\NTDS\*" Exclude.dir "*:\Program Files\Network Associates\VirusScan NT" Don't backup virus files // /* Multimedia files */ // Exclude "*:\...\*.tmp" TEMP FILES Exclude "*:\...\*.MP3" AUDIO FILES Exclude "*:\...\*.MPG" VIDEO FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.MP2" VIDEO FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.MPA" VIDEO FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.MPEG" VIDEO FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.MPG" VIDEO FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.MPV" VIDEO FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.AIF" REAL AUDIO Exclude "*:\...\*.MES" REAL AUDIO Exclude "*:\...\*.MED" REAL AUDIO Exclude "*:\...\*.AIFC" QUICKTIME AUDIO Exclude "*:\...\*.AIFF" QUICKTIME AUDIO Exclude "*:\...\*.ANI" ANIMATED CURSOR Exclude "*:\...\*.AU" MPLAYER SOUND Exclude "*:\...\*.SND" MPLAYER SOUND Exclude "*:\...\*.CDA" CDPLAYER AUDIO TRACK Exclude "*:\...\*.DCX" WANG IMAGING IMAGE Exclude "*:\...\*.THEME" DESKTOP THEME Exclude "*:\...\*.DIF" QUICKTIME VIDEO Exclude "*:\...\*.DV" QUICKTIME VIDEO Exclude "*:\...\*.EMM" REAL AUDIO MUSIC TRACK Exclude "*:\...\*.SC" REAL AUDIO SECURE DOWNLOAD Exclude "*:\...\*.JFIF" JPEG IMAGE Exclude "*:\...\*.JPE" JPEG IMAGE Exclude "*:\...\*.JPEG" JPEG IMAGE Exclude "*:\...\*.JPG" JPEG IMAGE Exclude "*:\...\*.LA1" LIQUID AUDIO FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.LAV" LIQUID AUDIO DOWNLOAD Exclude "*:\...\*.LAR" LIQUID AUDIO REGISTY PASSPORT FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.LAVS" LIQUID AUDIO SECURE DOWNLOAD Exclude "*:\...\*.LQT" LIQUID AUDIO TRACK Exclude "*:\...\*.LMSFF" LIQUID AUDIO PLAYER CLIP Exclude "*:\...\*.MID" MIDI SOUND FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.MIDI" MIDI SOUND FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.RMI" MIDI SOUND FILE Exclude "*:\...\*.MJ
Re: Where does the info for the "Q EVE" command come from?
Hi Steve, Here is how I do : adsm > q act begind=-1 endd=-0 msg= search=MY_SCHED where is the msg number you are looking for. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Steve Schaub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 16 mai 2001 13:01 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Where does the info for the "Q EVE" command come from? > > > I want to run a batch job to check failed events, but it > would be easier for me to process data from an SQL select, > rather than from the Q EVE command. I have tried selecting > from the EVENTS and from the SUMMARY tables, but still there > are times when a failed event will now show up in either of > these places but will be displayed using Q EVE. Anyone have > any ideas just where this is coming from so I can duplicate > it? Thanks. > > Steve Schaub > Haworth, Inc > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large > number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. >
Re: Problem with AIX client - not enough memory
Hi Tomas, It was discusses some weeks ago on the list, try the following switch in dsm.opt MEMORYEFficientbackup YES rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Hrouda Tomáš [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 9 mai 2001 15:28 > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Problem with AIX client - not enough memory > > > Hi all, > > I have (exactly one of our customers) problem with TSM AIX > client. Problem > is, that client "eat" much physical memory during start, and > if physical > memory allocation of this process reach all available > physical memory, then > fall down and generate messages: > > TSMsrv:/ # dsm > X Error: BadAtom > Request Major code 18 () > AtomID 0x0 > Error Serial #107150 > Current Serial #107163 > > TSMsrv:/ # dsm > Error: Cannot perform malloc > > TSMsrv:/ # dsm > Error: Object "" does not have windowed ancestor > > > TSM Client level: 4.1.2 > TSM Server level: 4.1.3 > AIX level: 4.3.3.0 > > Do anybody know something about this issue? > TOM > > > Tomáš Hrouda, AGCOM Smiřice > Tivoli Certified Consultant > Storage Manager Specialist > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 049-5941312, 0604-296521 > ICQ#77892561 > > > --- > Odchozí zpráva neobsahuje viry. > Zkontrolováno antivirovým systémem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). > Verze: 6.0.225 / Virová báze: 107 - datum vydání: 22.12.2000 >
Re: upgrade to TSM-Server 4.1.xx
I Wolfgang, TSM will run the 'upgrade db' automatically when running for the first time. Else you can try this command manually. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Wolfgang Herkenrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 9 mai 2001 16:07 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : upgrade to TSM-Server 4.1.xx > > > Hi *sm'ers, > > one little Question: > > I want to upgrade a TSM 3.7 Server to Version 4.1. on a AIX-System. > From MVS I know that I have to start the new Version with > 'upgrade DB'. > > At the manual 'TSM for AIX Quick Start Version 4.1' I didn't > find such a hint. > Isn't it necessary at AIX??? > > Wolfgang >
Re: SAN/TSM DB and Logs
Hi Geoff, MTI seems to provide good storage stuff but NOT for open SAN ! Vivant products contain both the storage parts AND the SAN parts (hub, switch) This is simple to plug to servers, but definitively NO EVOLUTIVE and NO SCALABLE. When all your connections (16 or 32) are used, you need to buy another VIVANT and another HBA if you want to add more disk space to one server. MTI offers an integrated-backup solution with VIVANT, but it is (or at least, was few months ago) only available with Legato and NetBackup and only for a VERY few number of SMALL libraries. It really depends on what you want to to with your VIVANT ? Rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 8 mai 2001 19:43 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : SAN/TSM DB and Logs > > > A question for all those using a SAN environment. We just had > a meeting with > some people from a company called MTI. Their solution is to provide a > complete end to end, HBA to DISK, environment. According to > them there is no > pointing of fingers since it all belongs to them. This sounds > interesting, > and from their list of clients I'm guessing some of you out > there could be > using the VIVANT line of storage. > > If any of you are could you please email me and tell me of > any stories you > may have, horror or otherwise. > > I'd also like to know from a SAN point of view if it's better > to keep TSM > database and logs on a local SSA disk or out on the SAN. > > Thanks for the info. > > Geoff Gill > TSM Administrator > NT Systems Support Engineer > SAIC > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: (858) 826-4062 > Pager: (888) 997-9614 >
help on changing library
hi *smers one of my customers changed his libr from a 7 slots HP one to a 5 slot one. 2 volumes are no longer accessible by tsm because the associated slots do not exist in my new libr. Can i destroy my libr and recreate a new one without loosing all my libvol infos ? I will have to manually checkin all my volumes. Thanx in advance rv
Linux et ReiserFS ?
Hi all I'm trying to backup one of my linux box, MDK 7.1, linux-2.2.19 FS are under ReiserFS, and it seems that TSM is annoyed with it ? Any idea ? # mount /dev/hda5 on / type reiserfs (rw,notail) none on /proc type proc (rw) none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,mode=0620) /dev/hda8 on /home type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hda6 on /usr type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hda7 on /var type reiserfs (rw) /dev/hda9 on /var/cache type reiserfs (rw) # cat dsm.opt SErvername TSM_PROJ01 subdir yes replace prompt compressalways no domain / /usr /home /var # dsmc i /usr Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 4, Release 1, Level 2.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2000, All Rights Reserved. Node Name: FOO Session established with server TSM_PROJ01: Windows NT Server Version 4, Release 1, Level 3.0 Server date/time: 05/03/2001 17:05:00 Last access: 05/03/2001 17:02:55 Incremental backup of volume '/usr' ANS1076E *** Directory path not found *** # - Herve CHIBOIS Tel : +33 1 53 53 53 33 Expert SAN/Stockage GSM : +33 6 60 09 97 88 CMG-ADMIRAL FranceFax : +33 1 53 53 53 30 19 rue de Ponthieu email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] F-75008 PARISWeb : www.admiral.fr -
Re: TSM client on Silicon IRIX
Hi Thomas, Just use the old 3.1 client for irix versions under 6.5 ftp://index.storsys.ibm.com/adsm/fixes/v3r1/sgi/ rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Hrouda Tomáš [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 3 mai 2001 07:53 > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : TSM client on Silicon IRIX > > > Hi all ! > > Situation: > Our customer wants to backup a few Silicon IRIX workstations, > he has 5.3, > 6.2, 6.3 and 6.5 versions of Silicon IRIX. In TSM client 4.1 > requirements is > specified Silicon IRIX 6.5 > > Question: > Does it mean, that older versions of IRIX are not supported? > Can I backup IRIX versions 5.3, 6.2, and 6.3 with TSM client 4.1 ? > > Thanx > > Tomáš Hrouda, AGCOM Smiřice > Tivoli Certified Consultant > Storage Manager Specialist > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 049-5941312, 0604-296521 > ICQ#77892561 > > > --- > Odchozí zpráva neobsahuje viry. > Zkontrolováno antivirovým systémem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). > Verze: 6.0.225 / Virová báze: 107 - datum vydání: 22.12.2000 >
Re: TSM client for SCO Open Server Release 5.0.6
Hi Kim, it works fine but you will have to use the old ADSM v2 or v3.1 client ftp://index.storsys.ibm.com/adsm/fixes/v2r1/sco/ ftp://index.storsys.ibm.com/adsm/fixes/v3r1/sco/ > -Message d'origine- > De : Kim McCubbin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 2 mai 2001 17:38 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : TSM client for SCO Open Server Release 5.0.6 > > > Is anyone using TSM to back up a Sco Open Server Release > 5.0.6 client? I checked the ftp site but could only find a > SCO Unixware 7 client. Where can I get the client? > > Thanks, > > Kim McCubbin > Server Support Specialist > Publishers Printing > 100 Frank E. Simon Ave. > Shepherdsville, KY 40165 > > Phone: (502)955-8989 ext. 2122 > Fax: (502)955-5586 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: DLT Clean problem
Hi Justino, Why don't you use the library autoclean functionality, it's simpler and moreover it won't use one slot in your 9740 as the cleaning slot is not visible for TSM ? rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Justino Costa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 2 mai 2001 16:41 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : DLT Clean problem > > > Hi all, > > I was wondering if some of you has had the following problem: > > --What we have: > > *) Storagetek 9740 with V1? > *) 5 DLT7000 Drives with V115 > *) Sun Solaris 2.6 runing TSM V4.1.2.0 > *) Autoclean is disabled on the library > *) TSM as "cleaning frequency" on all drives configure to "asneeded". > > --What happens: > > 1) When a drive turns on the "Cleaning Required" led, TSM > doesn't receive > any indication (or does not report it on the actlog ?) and > therefore, it > doesn't clean the drive. > > 2) In fact, TSM continues to read and/or write to the same tape or to > another tape loaded afterwards, although the drives's clean > led remains on. > > 3) Then, after a while, the drive reachs a point where it > cannot read or > write anymore to a tape. When this happens, TSM gives the > following error: > > 2001-04-29 19:20:05 > ANR8302E I/O error on drive DRIVE_0 (/dev/rmt/7mt) (OP=READ, CC=422, > KEY=03, ASC=80, ASCQ=01, > SENSE=F0.00.03.00.00.00.00.16.00.00.8D.28.80.01.00.00.00.00.81 > .03.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00., > Description=An undetermined error has occurred). Refer to > Appendix D in > the 'Messages' manual for recommended action. > > Which also appears on solaris syslog: > "unix: WARNING: mt@0,0: > scsi_cmd=8,errno=110,cc=422,sense=f0 0 3 0 0 > 0 0 16 0 0 8d 28 80 1 0 0 0 0 81 3 ^ " > > 4) TSM now cleans the drive but only after the ANR8302E message: > > 2001-04-29 19:20:05 ANR8914I Drive DRIVE_0 > (/dev/rmt/7mt) in library > STK9740_2 needs to be cleaned. > 2001-04-29 19:23:37 ANR8906I Cleaning drive DRIVE_0 > (/dev/rmt/7mt) in > library STK9740_2. > 2001-04-29 19:34:13 ANR8908I CLEAN DRIVE for drive DRIVE_0 > (/dev/rmt/7mt) in library STK9740_2 completed successfully. > > > --The problem: > > Due to the ANR8302E, any operation that was using that > tape/drive fails. If > the operation that failed had been, for example, a > reclamation process, > there shouldn't be a problem because we can allways restart a > reclamation > process. > > However, if the operation that abort had been, for example, a > TDPOracle > backup of a huge Database, then this is a problem because the > backup will > fail and it will have to start all over again. > > There is also another problem. Due to the several clean > erros, some tapes > are now unreadable and we already lost some. I managed to > recover some with > "restore volume" command but, there were other that I couldn't recover > because the readings kept failing, precisely when they were > being copied to > a copy pool. > > > --The simple question: > > Why doesn't TSM cleans the drive right after the drive's > clean led turns ON > ? > > > Thank you very much, > Justino Miguel Costa > Edinfor - Unix Team > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: TSM 4.1 solaris dsmc gives "syntax error" ?
Hi Keith
Try to add the DSM_CONFIG env var pointing at your dsm.opt file
rv
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoyé : mercredi 2 mai 2001 19:08
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : TSM 4.1 solaris dsmc gives "syntax error" ?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to write some bare metal solaris restore instructions.
>
> With our old ADSM/TSM 3.x clients we were able to simply boot off the
> solaris install cd, and ftp the "dsmc" and en_US directory
> over (vs having
> to install solaris and ADSM fully)... and then launch the
> dsmc command line,
> and "restore"
>
> BUT with the new TSM 4.1.2 client, when we try and lauch the
> dsmc command
> line with get something like:
>
> "./dsmc: syntax error at line1: '^?ELF^A^B^A^B...' unexpected
>
>
> Our old restore instructions (which we are trying to recreate
> with TSM4.1.2)
> are below:
>
>
> boot cdrom
> Complete "system identification" portion of Solaris Install
> Select "Exit" from "Install Solaris Software" screen
> run format and partition new disk
>
> # create filesystems
>
> newfs /dev/rdsk/c0t3d0s0
> newfs /dev/rdsk/c0t3d0s1
> newfs /dev/rdsk/c0t3d0s6
> newfs /dev/rdsk/c0t3d0s7
>
> # make mount points for all filesystems and mount them
>
> mkdir -p /tmp/a/root /tmp/a/usr /tmp/a/export
> mkdir -p /tmp/a/export/home
>
> mount /dev/dsk/c0t3d0s0 /tmp/a/root
> mount /dev/dsk/c0t3d0s6 /tmp/a/usr
> mount /dev/dsk/c0t3d0s7 /tmp/a/export/home
>
> # create a route to ADSM server
>
> route add net 129.6.xx.0 {default_route} 1
>
> # create a directory for dsmclient.cat
> # ftp a copy of minimal ADSM client software from ADSM
> server into /tmp
>
> cd /tmp
> mkdir /tmp/en_US
> ftp 129.xx.xx.xx - login as anonymous user
> cd pub/adsm/sun/sol26
> bin
> get dsmc
> get dsmclientV3.cat en_US/dsmclientV3.cat
> quit
>
> # create dsm.sys file
>
> echo servername ADSM > dsm.sys
> echo tcpserveraddress 129.6.23.13 >> dsm.sys
> echo nodename DIPPER.xxx.xxx >> dsm.sys
>
> # set DSM_DIR environment variable to point to location of dsmc, etc.
>
> DSM_DIR=/tmp
> export DSM_DIR
>
> # set execute permission on dsmc
>
> chmod 700 dsmc
>
> # restore all filesystems
>
> ./dsmc
> restore -subdir=y /* /tmp/a/root/
> enter ADSM password
> restore -subdir=y /usr/* /tmp/a/usr/
> restore -subdir=y /export/home/* /tmp/a/export/home/
> quit
>
> # make actual mount points
>
> mkdir /tmp/a/root/usr
> mkdir /tmp/a/root/export/home
> mkdir /tmp/a/root/dev/fd
> mkdir /tmp/a/root/proc
> mkdir /tmp/a/root/tmp
>
> # create device special files
>
> cd /tmp/a/root
> drvconfig -r devices -p /tmp/a/root/etc/path_to_inst
> devlinks -r /tmp/a/root
> disks -r /tmp/a/root
> tapes -r /tmp/a/root
>
> # install boot block
>
> installboot /tmp/a/usr/platform/`uname -i`/lib/fs/ufs/bootblk
> /dev/rdsk/c0t3d0s0
>
> # unmount filesystems and reboot the system
>
> cd /
> umount /tmp/a/root
> umount /tmp/a/usr
> umount /tmp/a/export/home
> halt
> halt
> boot -[s]r
>
Re: Server out of data storage space
Hi again, Looks stange, can you send me your act between the events 04/25/01 12:57:28 and 04/25/01 13:10:59 rv > -Message d'origine- > De : ABDULSALAM ABDULLA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 26 avril 2001 08:53 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: Server out of data storage space > > > Ya, stg is set much higher. > > Thanks, > Salam > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chibois, Herve [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:39 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Server out of data storage space > > Importance: High > > > > Hi Abdu > > > > Ok you have scratch tapes, but does your STG have the permissions to > > allocate > > one more ? Check the MAXSCRATCH param for your sequential STG. > > > > rv > > > > > -Message d'origine- > > > De : ABDULSALAM ABDULLA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Envoyé : jeudi 26 avril 2001 07:47 > > > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Objet : Server out of data storage space > > > > > > > > > Why it's giving [Server out of data storage space] error and > > > skipping for > > > some files. > > > I have more than 8 tapes as scratches. Surprisingly the next > > > schedule went > > > through with no problem!! > > > > > > Appreciate your help, > > > Salam > > > > > > Followings are the type of messages I'm getting > > > > > > 04/25/01 12:57:28 Normal File--> 137,102,205 > > > /u18/bckup_hot_tb/APRD/othe > > > r_data00.dbf.Z ** Unsuccessful ** > > > 04/25/01 12:58:14 ANS1114I Waiting for mount of offline media. > > > 04/25/01 12:58:14 Retry # 1 Normal File--> 137,102,205 > > > /u18/bckup_hot_t > > > b/APRD/other_data00.dbf.Z [Sent] > > > 04/25/01 13:01:06 Normal File--> 104,481,973 > > > /u18/bckup_hot_tb/APRD/othe > > > r_data01.dbf.Z [Sent] > > > 04/25/01 13:03:11 Normal File--> 134,090,627 > > > /u18/bckup_hot_tb/APRD/othe > > > r_data02.dbf.Z [Sent] > > > 04/25/01 13:05:46 Normal File--> 150,740,799 > > > /u18/bckup_hot_tb/APRD/othe > > > r_data03.dbf.Z [Sent] > > > 04/25/01 13:08:38 Normal File--> 249,077,811 > > > /u18/bckup_hot_tb/APRD/othe > > > r_data04.dbf.Z ** Unsuccessful ** > > > 04/25/01 13:09:23 ANS1114I Waiting for mount of offline media. > > > 04/25/01 13:09:23 Retry # 1 Normal File--> 249,077,811 > > > /u18/bckup_hot_t > > > b/APRD/other_data04.dbf.Z ** Unsuccessful ** > > > 04/25/01 13:10:59 ANS1329S Server out of data storage space > > > >
Re: Server out of data storage space
Hi Abdu Ok you have scratch tapes, but does your STG have the permissions to allocate one more ? Check the MAXSCRATCH param for your sequential STG. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : ABDULSALAM ABDULLA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 26 avril 2001 07:47 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Server out of data storage space > > > Why it's giving [Server out of data storage space] error and > skipping for > some files. > I have more than 8 tapes as scratches. Surprisingly the next > schedule went > through with no problem!! > > Appreciate your help, > Salam > > Followings are the type of messages I'm getting > > 04/25/01 12:57:28 Normal File--> 137,102,205 > /u18/bckup_hot_tb/APRD/othe > r_data00.dbf.Z ** Unsuccessful ** > 04/25/01 12:58:14 ANS1114I Waiting for mount of offline media. > 04/25/01 12:58:14 Retry # 1 Normal File--> 137,102,205 > /u18/bckup_hot_t > b/APRD/other_data00.dbf.Z [Sent] > 04/25/01 13:01:06 Normal File--> 104,481,973 > /u18/bckup_hot_tb/APRD/othe > r_data01.dbf.Z [Sent] > 04/25/01 13:03:11 Normal File--> 134,090,627 > /u18/bckup_hot_tb/APRD/othe > r_data02.dbf.Z [Sent] > 04/25/01 13:05:46 Normal File--> 150,740,799 > /u18/bckup_hot_tb/APRD/othe > r_data03.dbf.Z [Sent] > 04/25/01 13:08:38 Normal File--> 249,077,811 > /u18/bckup_hot_tb/APRD/othe > r_data04.dbf.Z ** Unsuccessful ** > 04/25/01 13:09:23 ANS1114I Waiting for mount of offline media. > 04/25/01 13:09:23 Retry # 1 Normal File--> 249,077,811 > /u18/bckup_hot_t > b/APRD/other_data04.dbf.Z ** Unsuccessful ** > 04/25/01 13:10:59 ANS1329S Server out of data storage space >
Re: TDP 3.1 and PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE
Hi Dave, Check your env. vars DSM_CONFIG is for BAclient DSMI_CONFIG should be for ADSMConnect agents rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Davidson, Becky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 23 avril 2001 16:43 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: TDP 3.1 and PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE > > > Are both the /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/dsm.sys and the > /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.sys set the same for that node? > > -Original Message- > From: Wolfgang Herkenrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 8:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: TDP 3.1 and PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE > > > Hi *'SM'ers, > > I installed TDP 3.1.0.5 on a TSM-Client 3.7.20 (AIX 4.3.3). > After some starting problems the client is now able to backup. > > But now I've got the following problem: > > At my dsm.sys file in /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin I set the > passwordaccess to prompt. All works fine. > But when I change the passowordaccess to generate the > passwordverification > fails. The passwordrequired parameter at the util-file is set > to no (like it > is discribed at the documentation). > > So, I changed the password for the client at the server. I > start dsmc with > root-user and tipe the new password. So far so good. > Now I run the command 'backint -p initSYS.utl -f password' to set the > password for TDP. But it failes. > > Are there any ideas why my normal dsmc session works and the > backint call > failed? > > TIA > > Wolfgang >
Re: Migration from Mainframe to AIX Platform
Hi Sam Oups ! I'm afraid the only possible split you can have is at filespace level when exporting a node from OS/390 to AIX. Do as many export as filespace for a particular node. The main drawback is that you will creep over your tapes more than one time ! You can also choose to export only HSM-ed data adsm > export node TOTO FILEA=SPacemanaged FILESPACE=\\TOTO\C$ Godd luck rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Sam Schrage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 23 avril 2001 16:37 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Migration from Mainframe to AIX Platform > > > We are migrating from an S390 to an AIX platform. We have 10 > clients that > we have to migrate, of which I'm down to the last three--these are my > problem 'children' because of size. One of the clients has > used Space > Management (HSM) over the past several years and we have about 200GB > migrated. From previous experience, we do not have enough > space to recall > all files, or do we have the time, either. All other clients > I was able to > do via the network(100 megabit) but these last few are so > large I don't > think I could trust the network, or our system, to stay up > long enough to > get it all done. > > I am worried about the HSM'ed data more than anything. I > calculated that > if I just do an ALLACTIVE on that client (200GB) that we're > looking at 3-4 > days via network to EXPORT, and probably about as long if we used > tape-to-tape--our S390 CPU runs between 90%-100% steadily. > Is there a way > to take the filespaces separately across over the next > several weeks/months > and still have them valid when I get to the new platform? On > the other > clients we just switched over, got the initial backup, but > I'm thinking > that with HSM I have to have one backup to prevent it from recalling, > backup, and migrating all the files. > > I've considered EXPORT to tape, but I think it would take > just about as > long to do...I don't see that much activity on the network during the > process. It seems to be the EXPORT process...reading tapes and > processing...that takes so long. > > Could we run 2 clients on the same workstation...one pointing > to the old > systems, one pointing to the new system? > > I feel like I have 20 pounds of something and trying to stuff > it into a 5 > pound bag! Any help/suggestions will be greatly > appreciated. I'm new at > this and thought when I volunteered for this group it was > pretty much under > control. And then the 'expert' left the company > > > Sam Schrage > Sr UNIX/Tivoli Systems Admin > TRW > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: redirect output(Update)
Geoff, I had the same pb, under AIX (TSM 3.7) do NOT put a space after your '>' if your command if defined in an admin schedule Here is one of my schedules DEF SCH NT NT_DMZ_INCR_DAILY - DESC="Incremental backup for NT server behind FW" ACT=C - OBJ="C:\TSM\SCRIPTS\save_nt.cmd >C:\TSM\LOG\save_nt.log" - PRI=5 STARTT=20:00 DUR=10 DURU=M PER=1 PERU=D DAY=ANY EXP=N rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 20 avril 2001 18:02 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : redirect output(Update) > > > Here is the problem(UPDATE), maybe I wasn't clear enough. Yes > I can run a > query or whatever and have the output redirected to a file if > I run it from > a command prompt. I am having problems trying to run it from > a TSM server > command script with the administrative command scheduler > kicking it off. > > The TSM server command "Tape_Checkout": > query drmedia * wherestate=mo source=dbsnapshot > /tmp/checkout.txt > move drmedia * wherestate=mo remove=yes tostate=courier > source=dbsnapshot > > The first part of the script fails for the redirection output > to a file, the > second part works. I would like to run this through the TSM > Scheduler for > simplicity but maybe it is not possible to create an output > file this way. > > Thanks again, > > Geoff Gill > TSM Administrator > NT Systems Support Engineer > SAIC > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: (858) 826-4062 > Pager: (888) 997-9614 >
Re: Total Active bytes for client
Hi Jane You can certainly write a big SQL statement. You can also see that if you use the following command adsm > EXPORT NODE foo PREVIEW=YES FILED=ALLA rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Jane Doe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 20 avril 2001 17:20 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Total Active bytes for client > > > Is there a select statement that somebody out there has > already written that > outputs the total bytes of active files a node has under TSM > Management. > > Thanks > > > > > > ___ > Send a cool gift with your E-Card > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ >
Re: Total Active bytes for client
ALLA(ctive) adsm > help export node .-FILEData--=--None-. >-+---+- '-FILEData--=--+-ALl--+-' +-None-+ +-ARchive--+ +-Backup---+ +-BACKUPActive-+ +-ALLActive+ '-SPacemanaged-' > -Message d'origine- > De : Jane Doe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 20 avril 2001 17:46 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: Total Active bytes for client > > > Does an export include all files or just active versions. I > want to know > just the amount of data for active versions. > > Thanks > JD > > > >Hi Jane > > >You can certainly write a big SQL statement. > > >You can also see that if you use the following command > > >adsm > EXPORT NODE foo PREVIEW=YES FILED=ALLA > > >rv > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : Jane Doe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Envoyé : vendredi 20 avril 2001 17:20 > > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Objet : Total Active bytes for client > > > > > > Is there a select statement that somebody out there has > > already written that > > outputs the total bytes of active files a node has under TSM > > Management. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > ___ > Send a cool gift with your E-Card > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ >
Re: redirecting output
Hi Geoff, under the dsmc> or adsm>, simply use the '>' redirection char You can also use the -output param with dsmadmc dsmadmc -id=admin -pass=xxx -output=/tmp/foo.log 'q proc' hope this helps rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 20 avril 2001 15:59 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : redirecting output > > > Hello all, > > I am trying to redirect the output of a server command script > to a file and > have been unable to do so. I'm getting: ANR2020E QUERY > DRMEDIA: Invalid > parameter - > and ANR2020E QUERY DRMEDIA: Invalid parameter - > |, depending > on which character I try. This is in the help file if you > "help 12" so why > doesn't it work? > > I am on AIX 4.3.3 TSM 4.1.2.0 > > Thanks for the help, > > Geoff Gill > TSM Administrator > NT Systems Support Engineer > SAIC > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: (858) 826-4062 > Pager: (888) 997-9614 >
Re: LICENSING QUESTION
Hi Joyce, If you have more defined licenses than purchased and ... want to be clean with IBM, just remove the nodelock file in the server's bin directory and Re-register the correct number you need. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Joyce Woods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 20 avril 2001 15:24 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : LICENSING QUESTION > > > Hello Everyone !!! > > Question...I have 50 licenses for clientsmy question > is how do I > remove clients from being licensed?? Nodes that have been > deleted are showing > up as being licensed. > > Thanks much, > Joyce >
Re: Performance Problem TSM 3.7.40 on Win NT
Hi Gerold several hints about your creeping server : - split your ONLY dbvol (10 gig) into several smaller volumes on differents disks - backup your DB more regularly (you will loose 650 MB of DB data in case of crash !) - Win NT 4 prefers TCPWINDOWSSIZE = 48 (16*3) rather than 63 - If your DB is on a RADI5 vol, you will loose in perf. => move it to a raid0 volume and use the TSM mirroring facility instead of WNT / RAID5 one - up to 100 concurrent sessions seems a bit too much for a single PIII 600, even if your % SCHEDULED SESSION is 50 - what's your disk config, how many, speed, size ? rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Bauer, Gerold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 20 avril 2001 07:11 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Performance Problem TSM 3.7.40 on Win NT > > > HI, > > the Performance of my TSM-Server is very bad. > System: Compaq Proliant 3000 / PIII 600 MHz / 1GB RAM / WinNT > 4.0 (SP5) > > The cache hit percentage is < 94% > > q db f=d: > > Available Space (MB): 10.000 > Assigned Capacity (MB): 10.000 > Maximum Extension (MB): 0 > Maximum Reduction (MB): 4.160 > Page Size (bytes): 4.096 > Total Usable Pages: 2.560.000 > Used Pages: 1.488.173 > Pct Util: 58,1 > Max. Pct Util: 58,1 > Physical Volumes: 1 > Buffer Pool Pages: 128.000 > Total Buffer Requests: 13.522.367 > Cache Hit Pct.: 93,97 > Cache Wait Pct.: 0,00 B > ackup in Progress?: No > Type of Backup In Progress: > Incrementals Since Last Full: 0 > Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 651,54 > Percentage Changed: 11,21 > Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 18.04.2001 12:00:16 > > > Here is my dsmserv.opt File: > > COMMmethod HTTP > HTTPPort 1006 > > COMMmethod TCPIP > TCPPort 1500 > > TCPWindowsize 63 > > TCPNODELAY Yes > > COMMmethod NAMEDPIPE > NAMEdpipename \\.\pipe\ADSMPIPE > > NPBUFFERSIZE 8 > > SECUREPipes No > > ADSMGROUPname adsmserver > > NPAUDITSuccess No > > NPAUDITFailure No > > MSGINTerval 1 > > MAXSESSIONS 100 > > BUFPoolsize 512000 > > LOGPoolsize 512 > > COMMTimeout 60 > > IDLETimeout 15 > > TXNGroupmax 256 > > DATEFORMAT 4 > > TIMEformat 1 > > NUMBERFORMAT 5 > > MESsageformat 1 > > LANGuage AMENG > > EXPInterval 0 > > EXPQUiet Yes > > MIRRORRead DB Normal > > MIRRORWrite DB Sequential > > SELFTUNEBUFPOOLSIZE YES > > DBPAGEShadow Yes > > DBPAGESHADOWFile DBPGSHDW.BDT > > MIRRORRead LOG Normal > > MIRRORWrite LOG Parallel > > MOVEBatchsize 40 > > MOVESizethresh 500 > > SELFTUNETXNsize No > > STAtusmsgcnt 1 > > VOLUMEHistory volhist.out > > DEVCONFig devcnfg.out > > RESTOREINTerval 1440 > > USELARGebuffers Yes > > DISABLESCHEDS No > > EVENTSERVER Yes > > REQSYS Yes > > ENABLE3590 Yes > > 3494SHARED Yes > > ASSISTVCRRECovery Yes > > QUERYAuth NONE > > ADREGISTER No > > ADUNREGISTER No > > --- > > > i hope that one of you is able to help me. > > > regards > Gerold Bauer >
Re: AIX TSM DB ON NT?
Hi Steve simplest way is to use the 'export server' command read the manual,it's very well documented > -Message d'origine- > De : Steve Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 19 avril 2001 17:08 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : AIX TSM DB ON NT? > > > I run TSM 4.1.2 on an AIX 4.3.3 platform, for testing > purposes, I'd like to > off-load my TSM DB to an NT installation of TSM (same > version), is this > possible, if so how can I accomplish this? >
Re: Database defragmentation (was Expiration)
Hi Mavis, defining "old" is not so simple. Let me give you some example where you DB can be considered as "old" or "fragmented" - you server was born in ADSM 3.1 and you upgraded to 4.1.3 after following all the latest patches / ptf 3.1.2.90... 3.7.2 3.7.4 ... ==> then you need to unload/load you DB - some years ago you defined an archiving policy and start storing archive files in you TSM box (or ADSM box). One day, your boss told you to separate your backup and archive into 2 tsm servers. So you did and moves all your archives files onto your second server. ==> here again you need to unload/load your DB - at the begginig, ADSM was running on a nice E20 with fast 4.5 GB hdd. By the years, you added disk for DB / STG and your system has plenty of different disks, small, huge, slow, fast... You decided to move onto a new H80 or pSeries server with a SAN storage or SSA disk unit. ==> One again, you will have better perf if you unload/load you DB. Generally speaking, on my customers' "big" tsm sites, I do this once a year if the production can be stopped. It *really* depends on how long you can stop your backup services and how much resources (CPU, disks, tapes) you have. Last point, says your DB is accros 2 big 9 Gig volumes, but only 51% filled. You want to change 2*9 gig by 4*4.5 gig for better perf. if tsm can not move you data (or remove a 9 gig vol), you can try to unload/load the db and it will be much easier for tsm to remove the big vols after the unload/load operations. Very last point. Daily, I log to an external DB (mysql), some stats about DB/LOG comsuption, node occupancy and schedule stats. It allows me to have an historic graph of some KEY values in tsm such as DB/LOG % and node occupancy. several months after the Y2K big jump, my DB lost 20 % (9 gig). This was a good occasion to degrad it. Hope this "best practises" will help you rv > -Message d'origine- > De : M Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 19 avril 2001 05:11 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Database defragmentation (was Expiration) > > > OK, I'm curious. > How do you define 'old' ? > How often do you need to defrag the ADSM database (or is this > like 'how > long is a piece of string'). How can you tell it needs > defragging ? I > know where to get this information from ADABAS but not ADSM > > Mavis > IP Australia > > -- > > >Date:Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:51:03 +0200 > >From:"Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: Expiration > > > >Hi Bert, > > > >Your TSM server creeps ! > > > >what is your BUFPOOLSIZE (dsmserv.opt) > > > >you should not go below 99.5 % for PCT CACHE > > > >change BUFPOOLSIZE to 256 Mo at least and restart your tsm server, > >the expiration process should fill the DB cache and it > should speed up > >your process. > > > >What kind of disks are you using ? SSA or SCSI ? are the DBVOL files > >on the same disks as AIX ? > > > >If your DB is "old" you should do an unload/load db operation to > >defrag. your DB pages. > > > >rv >
Re: Element Number.
Hi Marco have a look at Tivoli web site, all you need is here http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/devices/atab46.htm rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Marco Supino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 18 avril 2001 18:06 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Element Number. > > > Hi. > > I am tring to install a Qualstar 4440 library, which has 4 drives, and > 40 slots, the server is TSM 4.1.3 on Solaris 8, i chaned the > drivers in > /usr/kernel/drv to reflect the new ID's of the tapes, and robot. > > I removed and added the mt and lb drivers with rem_drv and add_drv. > > When i define the library everything seems fine, but when i want to > define the drives, i get an "invalid element" message, > according to the > manual in the Tsm web site, the elemets are 500 and going up, and > another Qualstar library with 2 tapes and 20 slots works just right. > > Any idea ? > > Thanks. > > Marco. > >
Re: When to reclaim copy storage pools
Hi Jon, reasonnably, if you just export copy tapes to your offsite vault, and no backups/archives are running during the WE, you can lower the reclaim threshold to 60% for your copy stg pools. During the week, put this value to 100% to be sure NOT to reclaim offsite tapes. Is mainly depend on how many drives you have and how much data you have to move. If you have collocated stg, reclaim offsite stg is faster. Hope this helps rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Jon Milliren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 18 avril 2001 18:06 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : When to reclaim copy storage pools > > > Hi, > > Just wondered when to run reclaim on copy storage > pool. Is this > normally done when copy stgpool volumes reach a certain percentage of > reclaimable space, or on a weekly basis "whether it needs it or not". > > Reason I'm asking is I'm trying to determine when I > will get some tapes > back from offsite. So far, I've made a copy storage pool, and run my > copy stg operations daily. So far, it doesn't look like I can reclaim > any volumes yet... I've started this about two weeks ago. > > Thanks, > > Jon > > -- > Jon Milliren > Systems Administrator > University of Pittsburgh > Office of Institutional Advancement > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (412) 624-2727 office > (412) 480-8495 mobile >
Re: Server Free Backup
Hi I'm afraid it won't be for now, even in the 4.2 summer issue. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Forgosh, Seth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 18 avril 2001 17:05 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Server Free Backup > > > Does anyone have any information about the availability of Server Free > Backup for TSM? > > > ** > This message, including any attachments, contains > confidential information intended for a specific individual > and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the > intended recipient, please contact sender immediately by > reply e-mail and destroy all copies. You are hereby notified > that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this > message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly > prohibited. > TIAA-CREF > ** >
Re: TSM 4.1 on AIX licences
Hi work good for me, different syntax tsm: SERVER1>reg lic file(10mgsyslan.lic) ANR2852I Current license information: ANR2827I Server is licensed to support Managed System for LAN for a quantity of 10. ANR2853I New license information: ANR2827I Server is licensed to support Managed System for LAN for a quantity of 20. > -Message d'origine- > De : Hrouda Tomáš [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 18 avril 2001 16:00 > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : TSM 4.1 on AIX licences > > > I have problem with licences in TSM 4.1.3 on AIX: > I have still no license for managed system for LAN registered > now. When try > to register new license by licence file (for example > 10mgsyslan.lic) by > command: > > register license file=/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/10mgsyslan.lic > > (I tried also: > register license > file=/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/10mgsyslan.lic number=1 > register license > file=/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/1mgsyslan.lic number=10 > register license file=/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/mgsyslan.lic > number=10 > but nothing helps) > > on TSM console appears msg: > > ANR2852I Current license information: > ANR2853I New license information: > > and no licences are registerred. (Normally should appear number of > registerred MSL, I think.) > > I found out, that In file nodelock in server/bin/ directory > appears version > information "3.7" in register items (??? don't know why !!!), > althoug in > license file is item CurrentVersion=4.1 !!! (pg 10mgsyslan.lic) > Licences were installed from original install CD of TSM for > AIX server 4.1 > (not upgrade from 3.7 server to 4.1), it was clear new TSM > 4.1 installation. > > Do anybody know, how to help me? > > > Tomáš Hrouda, AGCOM Smiřice > Tivoli Certified Consultant > Storage Manager Specialist > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 049-5941312, 0604-296521 > ICQ#77892561 > > > --- > Odchozí zpráva neobsahuje viry. > Zkontrolováno antivirovým systémem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). > Verze: 6.0.225 / Virová báze: 107 - datum vydání: 22.12.2000 >
Re: BUFPoolsize
Hi Don Yes, we can compare BUFPoolsize to SGA. To know how many RAM TSM is *reallyù using, svmon -P => 4096Bytes pages rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Don Avart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 18 avril 2001 15:04 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : BUFPoolsize > > > Is the BUFPoolsize parameter similar to the SGA of an > Oracle database? If I set this parameter to 262144 > will that pin 256 MB of Memory for the database? > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ >
Re: ADSM client for Solaris 2.5.1
Oups !! I'm afraid you will be stuck with an old 3.1 client ftp://index.storsys.ibm.com/adsm/fixes/v3r1/sol25 rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Rosli Anggon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 18 avril 2001 06:34 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : ADSM client for Solaris 2.5.1 > > > Hello, > > I'm planing to do backup one of our SUN workstation running solaris > 2.5.1 OS. > Appreciate if some one could tell me where can I down the ADSM client > this OS. > > Thank You in Advance. > Rosli >
Re: LAN Free Backup to Diskpool
Hi there As William says, TSM does not offer the LAN-free backup to a diskpool... except if you are using IP over FC (over your SAN), and moreover you "only" need a licence for a "Managed system by LAN". rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Vibhute, Bandu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 18 avril 2001 00:22 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: LAN Free Backup to Diskpool > > > Hi William, > > Tivoli doesn't allow to use diskpools for LAN free backup. At > least this > feature is not available in 4.1 version. The Tivoli > implementation of SAN > allows to share tape devices. Backup data directly moves from > Tivoli storage > agent to tape and metadata is stored in server through LAN. > If you want to > use Diskpool then backup data has to go through LAN. May be > you have to > design different LAN segment for passing backup data over > LAN. This will > backup operations will not interfere normal network > operations. This will > help you achieve LAN Free backup + use disk pools on server. More > information is found at following link > http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/pubs/v4pubs/v1_html/ > aix/msyssan/an > rcst09.htm > > -Bandu > > -Original Message- > From: Bill Mansfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 5:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: LAN Free Backup to Diskpool > > > Does anybody know whether it is/will be possible to do LAN > Free backup to a > server diskpool? The disk pool in question is SAN attached to the TSM > server, and the SAN could be extended to the client. Also, > when will the > Backup/Archive clients for NT, AIX, etc be enabled for LAN Free? > > > > _ > William Mansfield > Senior Consultant > Solution Technology, Inc > > > "WorldSecure Server " made the following > annotations on 04/16/01 18:13:04 > -- > -- > - > The origin of this electronic mail message was the Internet. > Bestfoods Baking cannot validate the authenticity > of the sender and therefore cannot be held accountable > for any content within. > === > > > > "WorldSecure Server " made the following > annotations on 04/17/01 18:31:03 > -- > --- > This message may contain confidential and trade secret > information of Bestfoods Baking, and be subject to the > Economic Espionage Act of 1996. For recipient's use only. If > you have received this message in error, please delete > immediately, and alert the sender. > > === >
Re: Please Help Explain Activity Log..
Does TSM tried to allocate a scratch tape to next storage pool ? What does your ACTLOG says ? > -Message d'origine- > De : Paul Roth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 17 avril 2001 17:45 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: Please Help Explain Activity Log.. > > > Thanks for the reply, > Next stgpool is tape pool with UPDATE STGPOOL DISKPOOL > HighMig=90 LowMig=70 CHANGED AT 17:00 > with 34 scratch volumes in a 3494lib. > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/17 11:31 AM >>> > Hi Paul, > > Seems one of your file exceeds your server storage capacity and > TSM can not guess what to do when DISKPOOL is full. What is your > next STG, does it have enough scratch volumes ? What are you > HI / LOW migration thresholds ? > > What is the latest file your NW client sent to TSM server > (dsmsched.log) > How big is it ? > > rv > > > > > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : Paul Roth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Envoyé : mardi 17 avril 2001 17:06 > > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Objet : Please Help Explain Activity Log.. > > > > > > If we got the ANR0534W - why? > > and why then did we get a return code (4) later ? > > > > tsm: ENTBAC01>q ac begind=-1 endd=today begintime=22:50 search=HAN1 > > > > Date/TimeMessage > > > > -- > > 04/16/01 22:50:00 ANR0406I Session 12954 started for > > node HAN1 (NetWare) > > (Tcp/Ip 140.254.147.112(7261)). > > 04/16/01 22:50:06 ANR0534W Transaction failed for > > session 12954 for node > > HAN1 (NetWare) - size estimate > > exceeded and server is > > unable to obtain additional space > > in storage pool > > DISKPOOL. > > 04/16/01 23:28:01 ANR0403I Session 12954 ended for > > node HAN1 (NetWare). > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4952I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Total number of > > objects inspected: 66,070 > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4954I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Total number of > > objects backed up: 479 > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4958I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Total number of > > objects updated: 0 > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4960I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Total number of > > objects rebound: 0 > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4957I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Total number of > > objects deleted: 0 > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4970I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Total number of > > objects expired:482 > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4959I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Total number of > > objects failed: 1 > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4961I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Total number of > > bytes transferred: 1.47 GB > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4963I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Data transfer time: > > 1,427.31 sec > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4966I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Network data > > transfer rate:1,086.10 KB/sec > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4967I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Aggregate data > > transfer rate:670.42 KB/sec > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4968I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Objects compressed > > by:0% > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4964I (Session: 12953, Node: > > HAN1) Elapsed processing > > time:00:00:32 > > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANR2579E Schedule NOVELL_DAILY in > > domain NOVELL for node > > HAN1 failed (return code 4). > > >
Re: Roll Forward Mode
Hi Geoff, You can increase BUFPOOLSIZE only if it take REAL memory, not swap. use the SVMON -P to check how much RAM TSM is really using. Before turning TSM into roll forward, reset your LOG MAX % UTIL and wait for a day or two to check the max % used. (adsm> help reset log) 2 Gig seems to be good for a 9 gig DB. Adjust your DB backup trigger (q stat) to something like 70 or 80% and test is for several days. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 17 avril 2001 17:07 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Roll Forward Mode > > > Here is a little of my environment that might help answer > this question: > TSM 4.1.2 > AIX 4.3.3 > 3494lib with 4 3590-E1A's > > Database: > > Available Space (MB): 18,000 > Assigned Capacity (MB): 18,000 > Maximum Extension (MB): 0 > Maximum Reduction (MB): 8,740 > Page Size (bytes): 4,096 > Total Usable Pages: 4,608,000 > Used Pages: 2,356,088 > Pct Util: 51.1 > Max. Pct Util: 51.5 > Physical Volumes: 6 > Buffer Pool Pages: 32,768 > Total Buffer Requests: 188,336,528 > Cache Hit Pct.: 98.12 (BufPoolSize > 131072) >Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00 >Backup in Progress?: No > Type of Backup In Progress: > Incrementals Since Last Full: 0 > Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 621.21 > Percentage Changed: 6.75 > Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 04/16/01 11:16:22 > > Log: >Available Space (MB): 2,000 > Assigned Capacity (MB): 2,000 > Maximum Extension (MB): 0 > Maximum Reduction (MB): 1,996 > Page Size (bytes): 4,096 > Total Usable Pages: 511,488 > Used Pages: 279 >Pct Util: 0.1 > Max. Pct Util: 89.3 >Physical Volumes: 4 > Log Pool Pages: 2,048 > Log Pool Pct. Util: 0.18 > Log Pool Pct. Wait: 0.00 > Cumulative Consumption (MB): 409,183.96 > Consumption Reset Date/Time: 09/27/99 13:00:44 > > I want to switch to roll forward mode but am not sure if the > log size is > sufficient. Does anyone have any experience with switching in > mid stream? I > have about 120 clients, I do have a space trigger set for > both the DB and > log. > > I'd also like to know if anyone thinks my (BufPoolSize > 131072) is a > bit low. I discovered my cache hit was down below 97% last > week so I reset > the buffer pool and it creeped up to just over 98%. Would > increasing this > help? Do I need to consider my total server memory before I > increase this? > > Thanks for all the help, > > Geoff Gill > TSM Administrator > NT Systems Support Engineer > SAIC > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: (858) 826-4062 > Pager: (888) 997-9614 >
Re: Please Help Explain Activity Log..
Hi Paul, Seems one of your file exceeds your server storage capacity and TSM can not guess what to do when DISKPOOL is full. What is your next STG, does it have enough scratch volumes ? What are you HI / LOW migration thresholds ? What is the latest file your NW client sent to TSM server (dsmsched.log) How big is it ? rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Paul Roth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 17 avril 2001 17:06 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Please Help Explain Activity Log.. > > > If we got the ANR0534W - why? > and why then did we get a return code (4) later ? > > tsm: ENTBAC01>q ac begind=-1 endd=today begintime=22:50 search=HAN1 > > Date/TimeMessage > > -- > 04/16/01 22:50:00 ANR0406I Session 12954 started for > node HAN1 (NetWare) > (Tcp/Ip 140.254.147.112(7261)). > 04/16/01 22:50:06 ANR0534W Transaction failed for > session 12954 for node > HAN1 (NetWare) - size estimate > exceeded and server is > unable to obtain additional space > in storage pool > DISKPOOL. > 04/16/01 23:28:01 ANR0403I Session 12954 ended for > node HAN1 (NetWare). > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4952I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Total number of > objects inspected: 66,070 > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4954I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Total number of > objects backed up: 479 > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4958I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Total number of > objects updated: 0 > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4960I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Total number of > objects rebound: 0 > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4957I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Total number of > objects deleted: 0 > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4970I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Total number of > objects expired:482 > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4959I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Total number of > objects failed: 1 > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4961I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Total number of > bytes transferred: 1.47 GB > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4963I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Data transfer time: > 1,427.31 sec > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4966I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Network data > transfer rate:1,086.10 KB/sec > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4967I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Aggregate data > transfer rate:670.42 KB/sec > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4968I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Objects compressed > by:0% > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANE4964I (Session: 12953, Node: > HAN1) Elapsed processing > time:00:00:32 > 04/16/01 23:28:02 ANR2579E Schedule NOVELL_DAILY in > domain NOVELL for node > HAN1 failed (return code 4). >
Re: HSM Migration Processes
Hi Don you many migration processes are allowed at the same time in your STG ? rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Don Avart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 17 avril 2001 16:34 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : HSM Migration Processes > > > Our TSM server (RS6000 S7A) is attached to an STK silo > with 22 tape drives. The problem that we are > experiencing, beyond library and drive reliability, is > with the apparent migration and recall process. > Because we have many tape drives, we have dedicated 8 > drives to HSM only. We have two HSM enabled > filesystems, /hsmprod and /hsmuser which are local to > the TSM server. The filesystem of most concern is > /hsmprod (production). This filesystem is 200GB and > has 90GB written to it nightly. > > The problem we are encountering is if we miss a backup > or two the filesystem is full. The backup process is > relatively fast, we write to disk and to multiple tape > drives. However, the migration process is extremely > slow. It appears that this process will only mount > one tape drive for migration. Yet when users try to > recall data, it will mount multiple tapes and spawn up > to 20 recall processes (as per maxrecalldaemons=20). > Are there any settings to increase the number of > sessions or daemons the migration process will spawn. > > Thanks in Advance > > Don Avart > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ >
Re: Expiration
Hi Bert, Your TSM server creeps ! what is your BUFPOOLSIZE (dsmserv.opt) you should not go below 99.5 % for PCT CACHE change BUFPOOLSIZE to 256 Mo at least and restart your tsm server, the expiration process should fill the DB cache and it should speed up your process. What kind of disks are you using ? SSA or SCSI ? are the DBVOL files on the same disks as AIX ? If your DB is "old" you should do an unload/load db operation to defrag. your DB pages. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Bert Moonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 17 avril 2001 15:44 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Expiration > > > Hello, > > expiration runs very, very, very slow. Only 16 objects in 20 > minutes time. > We have ADSM 3.1.2.90 on an S70 machine with 4GB Memory AIX 4.3.3. > Does anyone know what my problem is > adsm> q db f=d > Available Space (MB): 19,300, Assigned Capacity (MB): 17,964, Maximum > Extension (MB): 1,336, Maximum Reduction (MB): 3,740, Page > Size (bytes): > 4,096, Total Usable Pages: 4,598,784, Used Pages: 3,315,954, > Pct Util: 72.1, > Max. Pct Util: 72.1, Physical Volumes: 1, Buffer Pool Pages: > 32,768, Total > Buffer Requests: 651,353,008, Cache Hit Pct.: 98.34, Cache > Wait Pct.: 0.00, > Backup in Progress?: No, Type of Backup In Progress:, > Incrementals Since > Last Full: 0, Changed Since Last Backup (MB): 1,759.66, > Percentage Changed: > 13.58, Last Complete Backup Date/Time: 04/16/01 17:00:39. >
Re: Cant CHECKOUT LIBV - ANR8442E
Hi Herfried is you volume still mounted / in use ? check if you hav not a running background process that uses the volume adsm > q mount adsm > q drive adsm > Q PROC rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Herfried Abel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 17 avril 2001 09:57 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Cant CHECKOUT LIBV - ANR8442E > > > Hi to all, > I had a tape with lots of write errors in an 3575-L16 library. After > sucessfully moving the data to a different tape, I want to > check the old > one out and get the following error ? > > what am I doing wrong > The returncode ANR8442E tells me that there is some > "conflict" with this > volume - but a cant se any ! > > thanks herfried > > adsm> checkout libv MSTAR 0260B8 > ANR8442E CHECKOUT LIBVOLUME: Volume 0260B8 in library MSTAR > is currently in > use. > ANS8001I Return code 12. > > adsm> q libv Mstar 0260B8 > > Library NameVolume NameStatus Last Use >Home Element > ----- > > MSTAR 0260B8 Scratch 47 > > adsm> q pr > ANR0944E QUERY PROCESS: No active processes found. > ANS8001I Return code 11. > > adsm> q se > > Sess Comm. Sess Wait Bytes Bytes Sess Platform Client Name > Number Method StateTimeSent Recvd Type > -- -- -- -- --- --- - > > 6.827 Tcp/Ip Run 0 S1,5 M 14,8 K Admin AIX DSMADM > > adsm> q req > ANR8346I QUERY REQUEST: No requests are outstanding. > ANS8001I Return code 11. > > adsm> q mount > ANR2034E QUERY MOUNT: No match found using this criteria. >
Re: LAN Free Backup to Diskpool
Hi Bill, If you are using an ESS with the Flashcopy soft, Yes, in some circumstances, you can do LAN-free backup. If not is this *very* particular case, I'm afraid not ! rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Bill Mansfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 16 avril 2001 23:48 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : LAN Free Backup to Diskpool > > > Does anybody know whether it is/will be possible to do LAN > Free backup to a > server diskpool? The disk pool in question is SAN attached to the TSM > server, and the SAN could be extended to the client. Also, > when will the > Backup/Archive clients for NT, AIX, etc be enabled for LAN Free? > > > > _ > William Mansfield > Senior Consultant > Solution Technology, Inc >
Re: file name too long when?
Hi Peter, Which versions (client/servers) and platforms are you using ? If I remember, 255-chars are the max length for NT filenames in *SM, as in Windows ... rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Glass, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 12 avril 2001 22:43 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : file name too long when? > > > One of our NT clients is getting a large number of 'ANE4018E > ...: file name > too long' errors in their backups. The file names in question > are indeed > quite long. > Does anybody know the TSM standard on file name lengths? > Can somebody point me to which TSM docs discuss this specifically? > Thank you! > > Peter Glass > Distributed Storage Management (DSM) > Wells Fargo Services Company > > * 612-667-0086 * 866-249-8568 > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
Re: Windows TSM device support for Compaq DLT Library
Hi Jeff, I don't know what is really a ESL9198 but the ESL9326 is a ATL P3000/6000, go and see on the ATL site which library is yours and check on tivoli's site http://www.atlp.com/libs.html rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Jeff Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 12 avril 2001 22:37 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Windows TSM device support for Compaq DLT Library > > > Is anyone using a Compaq ESL9198DLX DLT Library with a Windows NT/2000 > based TSM server? The Tivoli TSM site only lists the Compaq > ESL9326 under > the supported DLT Tape Libraries. The Compaq Enterprise > Backup Solution > web site lists the ESL9198DLX as supported by TSM on SUN and Windows > NT/2000. I assume the Tivoli site is correct. I think the > 9198 is the > smaller version of the 9326 does/would it work with TSM > server for Windows? > > Thanks, > Jeff Connor > Niagara Mohawk Power Corp >
Re: Core dump on Solaris
Hi Loon appears to be a know bug, chekc your LANG var, should be C $ export LANG=C; dsm Tell me ! rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 12 avril 2001 17:30 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Core dump on Solaris > > > Hi *SM-ers! > I have a very strange problem on several (but not all) Sun clients. > They are running Sun OS 5.6 and the 3.7.2 client. > When I start the gui dsm as root I receive a segmentation > fault along with a > core dump. When I start dsm under any other user id, it works > without any > problems! > Is there anybody out there who can help me with solving this problem? > Thank you very much in advance! > Kindest regards, > Eric van Loon > KLM Royal Dutch Airlines > > > ** > This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and > privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you > are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the > e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or > distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail > or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If > you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the > sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its > subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the > incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any > attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. > ** >
Re: Exclude List for NT 4.0
Hi Bruce, try dsmc > q inclexcl to see want TSM has understood of your inclexcl list. Remember to stop/start your scheduler when modifying dsm.opt rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Bruce Kamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 11 avril 2001 14:52 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Exclude List for NT 4.0 > > > Just finished upgrading to AIX 4.1.2 Server & on my NT > servers I am having a > problem with excludes that used to work on 3.1. I am using > client version > 4.1.2 These are the 2 files on one of my servers but this is > happening on a > lot them. I am also using a client option set. > Here are the options I have defined: > Exclude *:\WINNT\system32\asat0*.tmp > Exclude *:\apps\mrswin\DB\Mrs.log > Here are the errors: > 04/10/01 13:18:40 ANE4987E (Session: 892, Node: CANCERDATA_NT40) Error > processing '\\cancerdata_nt40\d$\apps\mrswin\DB \MRS.LOG': > the object is in > use by another process 04/10/01 13:19:10 > ANE4987E (Session: 892, Node: CANCERDATA_NT40) Error processing > '\\cancerdata_nt40\c$\WINNT\system32 \asat0004.tmp': the > object is in use by > another process > I set these up manually & also using the setup wizard through > the backup > client. Tried using with & with out quotes. Tried using *:\winnt & > D:\winnt. All producing the same results. > > -- > Bruce Kamp > Network Analyst II > Memorial Healthcare System > P: (954)987-2020 x4542 > F: (954)985-1404 > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Hi George in 4.3.2 you can use the 2.2.32.7 version. 2.2.33.x needs 4.3.3 for your OS. > -Message d'origine- > De : George Lesho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 10 avril 2001 21:43 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. > > > Shawn, This is not as simple as it sounds, I am at 4.3.2 > maint level 0 and > require two maint level upgrades to be able to install the > new perfagent.tools > fileset. We will be going to 4.3.3 soon on all our boxes and > the one we are > testing currently is at 4.3.3 -07 and svmon works great > there. Will probably > just hang in there until I get the O/S upgraded to avoid > having to fumble > through a change control process to upgrade 4.3.2 when 4.3.3 > has already been > approved. Thanks > > George Lesho > Storage/System Admin > AFC Enterprises > > > > > > > Shawn Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/10/2001 07:46:03 AM > > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC) > Fax to: > Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. > > > > > > Update your perfagent.tools to 2.2.33.50. svmon was broken > in the previous > few releases. > > -- > Shawn Raymond > Sr. Technical Consultant > Synergy, Inc. > 518-782-3457 > > > > Shekhar > DhotreTo: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > BAYER.COM>Subject: > Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help > Needed.. > Sent by: "ADSM: > Dist Stor Manager" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > EDU> > > > 04/09/01 04:53 PM > Please respond to > "ADSM: Dist Stor > Manager" > > > > > > > > > I am trying to execute svmon but , getting following > error ..any idea ? > > medrs2:ps -aef | grep dsmserv > root 42134 1 0 Apr 02 - 2474:14 dsmserv > root 48518 47810 1 16:36:56 pts/10 0:00 grep dsmserv > > > medrs2:sh /usr/bin/svmon -P 42134 > sh: /usr/bin/svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied. > > medrs2:id > uid=0(root) gid=0(system) > groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit) > medrs2: > > > medrs2:svmon > open: No such file or directory > > medrs2:/usr/bin/svmon > open: No such file or directory > > medrs2:cd /usr/bin > > medrs2:./svmon > open: No such file or directory > > medrs2:sh svmon > sh: svmon: 0403-006 Execute permission denied. > > medrs2:echo $PATH > /usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin > > Thanks > shekhar .. > > > > > George Lesho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/09/2001 > 03:19:45 PM > > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > > Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. > > > Herve, Where am going wrong here??? > > # ps -aef | grep dsmserv > root 30300 34772 0 Apr 07 - 606:00 dsmserv quiet > # svmon -P 30300 > > Pid Command Inuse Pin > Pgspace > 64-bit > 30300*** process does not exist *** > > Drop me a note off line and help me out... I am not sure why > it is coming > back > and > saying that my TSM server is not running thanks- > > George Lesho > Storage/System Admin > AFC Enterprises > > > > > > > > "Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04/06/2001 10:23:05 AM > > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC) > Fax to: > Subject: Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. > > > > Hi Richard, > > to know exactly how many RAM TSM is eating, try the following : > > % ps -eaf | grep dsmserv --> GET PID > % svmon -P > >--- physical RAM pages (4Ko) ---+ >v > Pid CommandInusePin > Pgspace > 11638 dsmserv.4255741 16 >37293 >| > Pid: 11638+> 217 MB > Command: dsmserv.42 > > Segid Type Description InusePin Pgspace Address Range > 1ba6 pers /dev/hd3:93 0 00 0..0 > 7a1 pers /dev/hd3:88 0 00 0..0 > ... > > Hope this helps > rv > > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Envoy > >
Re: Announce new node IP to Server
Hi Clemens, Stop/start you scheduler on the client. If it is a RS/6000 client (and it it), a better solution is to reboot the node. You can also force the client passwd on the server to force the client to re-authentificate to its server. you can also deassociates/reassociates your node from its schedule rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Block, Clemens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 10 avril 2001 14:23 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Announce new node IP to Server > > > Hi all! > > I have a problem with server prompted schedules. > > We had to modify the IP Address of a client Node (IBM RS6000). > It works really well for all standard appllikations running on the > System. > > To make a backup possible I edit the dsm.sys file on the Node and > replace the old TCPCLIENTAddress with the new one. Depending > on the new network structure the Hostname of the TCPServeraddress > also changed and I replaced these option too. > > Test to connect the Server from the client using dsmc work well. I can > see sessions on the Server with the new IP Address. Backups are > possible without any problem. > Even if I execute "dsmc q schedule " I get the right > Informations about > the Server prompted schedule for this node > > Now the Problem: > If the Server start to initiate a backup session caused by a > Server prompted > schedule I get the connection error: > ANR2716E Schedule prompter was not able to contact client MORITZ > using type 1 (192.168.66.226 1502) > The Message is correct, because 192.168.66.226 is the old IP Address. > > So my question is: > How can I notify the server, that the node has an new IP Address. > > Thanks in advance, > Clemens >
Re: DSMSERV UNLOADDB on S/390 running TSM 4.1.3
Hi Niklas, give me the command you typed for unloading your DB. Normally, if you specify scratch=yes, either with a tape devc or a file one, TSM will allocate one volume, then another... $ dsmserv unloaddb devc=DLTCLASS scratch=YES check how many mount points are available at the same time in your devc sned me your log offline if you want rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Nilsson Niklas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 10 avril 2001 11:22 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : DSMSERV UNLOADDB on S/390 running TSM 4.1.3 > > > Hi! > > Has anybody had problem doing a unloaddb on an S/390 system > running 4.1.3??? > We are trying to do a unload to tape but when the tape get > full, the TSM > don't mount next tape. > Tried to do this to 3390-disc but got the same problem , when > the disc get > full , "he" unmounts > the disc but never mounts the next one. > There is no problem if you do an export to a deviceclass=file > or tape when > server is up and running. > > Regards > Niklas >
Re: DATABASE backup question FULL or INCREMENTAL?
Hi Dave, it seems that your are doing a FULL db backup on an external site. How big is your DB. Usually, when people are short of resource (you should not be in that case under os/390) they often do a full on tape (or external site) once a week, and incremental on disk during week. IMHO, there is not a "good way" and a "bad way" to save your DB. It depends on many params such as how many % are changed each night, how big is your DB, how powerfull is you server, how many disk you have, and finally which kind of tapes you are using. TSM Administrators do not like to waste a 40 GB tape for a 500 MB DB backup; that why sometimes, DB is save on disk. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : David Browne. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 9 avril 2001 16:23 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : DATABASE backup question FULL or INCREMENTAL? > > > I am doing a nightly database full backup with ADSM/TSM. > (TSM 3.7.4 on > OS390/2.10) > What is most commonly done a Full or Incremental? > What are the advantages/disadvantages of a full over an > incremental backup > of the servers database? > The command we enter is as follows: > backup db type=full devclass=dboffsite > Where dboffsite is the a tape device class. >
Re: AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed..
Hi Richard, to know exactly how many RAM TSM is eating, try the following : % ps -eaf | grep dsmserv --> GET PID % svmon -P --- physical RAM pages (4Ko) ---+ v Pid CommandInusePin Pgspace 11638 dsmserv.4255741 1637293 | Pid: 11638+> 217 MB Command: dsmserv.42 Segid Type Description InusePin Pgspace Address Range 1ba6 pers /dev/hd3:93 0 00 0..0 7a1 pers /dev/hd3:88 0 00 0..0 ... Hope this helps rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 6 avril 2001 17:17 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : AIX Gurus.. .Help Needed.. > > > I use the "top"utility to monitor my server adsm server load. > I noticed > that the Real memory statement is showing 812M files is being > used. What > does the files statement mean? it seems whatever files means > is taking up > all of my memory. > > Load averages: 0.10, 0.04, 0.04 adsmsrv1Fri > Apr 6 10:15:50 > 2001 > Cpu states: 0.7% user 3.5% system 7.8% wait 88.0% idle For > non-commercial > Logged on: 1 users 1 active 1 remote 00:10 sleep time > use only > !!! > Real memory: 211.6M procs 812.0M files0.5M free 1024.0M total > Virtual memory: 137.6M used 3574.4M free 3712.0M total > > > > ***EMAIL DISCLAIMER** > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be > confidential and are > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom they are > addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual > responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, any > disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or > omitted to be taken > in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this e-mail > in error, please delete it and notify the sender or contact Health > Information Management (312) 996-3941. >
Re: Question about Libraries with one drive
Hi Angelica, Use the SPACEMGPOOL, it is implemented for that ! rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Angelica Tulipano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 6 avril 2001 16:35 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Question about Libraries with one drive > > > Hi!, > We have a TSM server Vs 3.7 on an NT 4.0 Netfinity Server, > connected to it > we have a library with one drive. I know we cant use the > features of the > DRM of copy pool because we dont have another drive to do it, > but i have a > doubt that if someone of you have solve it, i will apreciate > your help on > this. > If someone have a library with just one drive and also have a > procedure for > creating a offsite backup set of tapes to be more protected in case of > disaster, and can share it with me i will appreciate it > > Thanks again > > Ing. Angélica Tulipano > GBM de Panamá, S.A. > Phone (507) 263-9977 ext 202 > Fax (507) 269-3604 > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: Wanted: Unix client done right
Hi Thomas, You can try 4.1 client if you want for some nodes, but keep i, mind you WON'T BE ABLE to go back to 3.7 after. 3.7 and 4.1 Client formats are NOT compatible rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Thomas Denier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 5 avril 2001 17:32 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Wanted: Unix client done right > > > We have a number of HP-UX 11.0 clients doing backups to a 3.7.4.0 > server running under OS/390. We upgraded the software on most of > these clients from 3.1.0.6 to 3.7.0.0. The clients started suffering > recurrent backup failures because of a bug that results in the > message "Unknown system error. Return code 195." I recently upgraded > a number of these clients to 3.7.2.16, which has a fix for that bug. > The newly upgraded clients are generating the message "aCC runtime: > ERROR: _main() not called." when a dsmc command or a program using > the TSM API interface terminates. The backups appear to be successful, > but the system administrators involved are still nervous about the > messages. One of them is now proposing that I install 4.1 client code. > Given Tivoli's recent track record, this will probably just trade one > set of annoying quirks for another, with a significant probability > that the new set will do more real harm. > > Is there any 4.1 client level for HP-UX that is free of glaringly > obvious defects? Tivoli claims that 4.1 clients are compatible with > 3.7 servers. Are there any compatability issues that Tivoli is not > acknowledging? >
Re: 4.1.2 INstallation MSI error?
Try to install it from a local drive , not a network share Uninstall the previous version before > -Message d'origine- > De : Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 4 avril 2001 21:03 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : 4.1.2 INstallation MSI error? > > > Yikes - > Installing 4.1.2.12 on a Win2K machine, when we click the > INSTALL button in > the wizard, a box pops up with: > > !Internal Error 2755,1632,\\pathname\Tivoli Storage Manager Client.msi > > > We have installed 4.1.2.12 on other WIn2K machines with no problem. > > Not being a Windows Wizard myself, I have NO idea what is going on. > Can anybody tell me what is happening, or even where to look for the > problem? >
Re: TSM Upgrade
Hi Jim, AIX upgrade is the easiest one, here are the steps I use: 1) download the latest PTF from IBM site : TSM 4.1.3 and 4.1.2.x for client put the extracted BFF packages in the same directory as the base filesets you have on your CDs, 2) Stop TSM after having checked : - disks stg are empty (not mandatory) - no tapes in drives, - no running sessions, - you did a FULL DB backup - you backed-up DEVCONFIG and VOLHISTORY 3) CD to your /BFFpackages_repository dir and % smitty update_all 4) TSM will remove older packages, install new ones and run a UPGRADE DB if needed. 5) restart it, 6) if you think your DB is "fragmented", run a UNLOADDB / LOADDB > -Message d'origine- > De : Jim Jepson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 5 avril 2001 19:12 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: TSM Upgrade > > > Hi Geoff, > > I just received my TSM 4.1 upgrade CDs. So I'm faced with the fun of > upgrading to 4.1 on my AIX system. I would love to see your > document on > the steps to do this properly. > > Thanks, Jim > > On Monday, February 5, 2001, at 02:07 PM, Jolley, Bill wrote: > > > Before the upgrade, what model tape drive were you using? > I currently > > have > > 3590-B11 and should I be investigating moving to an E J or K model > > before/during/after the upgrade. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 1:07 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: TSM Upgrade > > > > > > Info for all, > > > > Last Tuesday I upgraded my ADSM server running AIX 4.3.3 to TSM > > 4.1.2.0. For > > all those concerned about the upgrade I must say it was quite easy. > > Since > > I'm on AIX I can't speak for the other OS's. > > > > My 3494 did have old Atape drivers so I had to update > those, and while > > I was > > at it I updated atldd drivers too. I have not had any > problems, I know > > it's > > only been a week. Hopefully things will remain this way and all I'll > > need is > > some maintenance patches to fix bugs. I know we've had a lot of > > complaints > > about this, and it may well be deserved, but if you think about it > > nobody > > has a perfect product out of the box and software always has > > bugs...that's > > life I can't very well point fingers, I'm not a > programmer and have > > enough problems just trying to learn it all > > > > I'd be glad to share a document I have with the steps I followed to > > anyone > > who'd like it. It also has some notes I made. It applies to > AIX so I'm > > not > > sure if it will do others any good, I'll send it anyway if you like. > > > > Email me seperately if you'd like it. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Geoff Gill > > NT Systems Support Engineer > > SAIC > > Computer Systems Group > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Phone: (858) 826-4062 > > Pager: (888) 997-9614 > > > > _/_/_/_/_/_/ Jim Jepson, L&RE System Admin & Networking > _/_/ Apple Computer, Inc. > _/_/ 3 Infinite Loop Cupertino, CA 95014 > _/_/ _/_/ Direct: 408-974-6368 FAX: 408-996-3783 > _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/MS:303-1SC, E-MAIL: >
Re: Desasterbackup with TSM for NAS System
Hi Stefan, For faster recovery, use COLLOCATION on your TAPE STG. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Stefan Holzwarth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 5 avril 2001 16:54 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Desasterbackup with TSM for NAS System > > > Hello, > > since we soon get a NAS system from Netapp (1,6 TByte, many > small files) > and we want to do our desasterbackup with TSM@MVS (5*3590 in > 2 different > locations, GB Ethernet) > I think about tuning this environment for fast full recovery. > > Some topics: > - restores in future with NAS snapshot-technology: therefore > no need for > managementclasses with many versions (smaller database, > optimal used tapes) > - smaller database - second installation of a TSM server on > the same MVS > Host. No interaction with the old TSM System (80 smaller Clients) > - as many simultaneous restoresessions as possible > (dividing large filesystems up in smaller parts by using > combinations of different nodenames with different incl/excl > on the same > filesystem) > > What are your ideas? > > With regards, > Stefan Holzwarth > > P.S Sorry for the first posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > -- > -- > Stefan Holzwarth > ADAC e.V. (Rechenzentrum, Produktionsplanung und Organisation) > Am Westpark 8, 81373 München Tel.: (089) 7676-5212, Fax: > (089) 76768924 > > -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- > Version: 4.0 > GCM/S d- s+: a C+(++) ULA++ P+>++ L+(++) E--- W++>+ N++ o-- K? > w+(++) O+ M V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP->+ t+ 5+ !X R tv b !DI D G e+++ h--- r z? > ---END GEEK CODE BLOCK- >
Re: Q BACKUPSET generates an ANR9999D error.
Restart you TSM server service, and try again, it seems you have a SHared MEMory pb. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Phil Bone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 5 avril 2001 16:43 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Q BACKUPSET generates an ANRD error. > > > I searched the archives and did not see if this was a known problem. > > > > 04/05/01 09:33:27 ANR2017I Administrator x issued > command: QUERY > >BACKUPSET > > 04/05/01 09:33:27 ANRD pkshmem.c(330): Invalid attempt to free > memory; >called from 10456d30 (AdmQueryBkSet). > > > > > Version: Storage Management Server for AIX-RS/6000 - Version > 3, Release 7, > Level 2.0 > > Thanks, > > Phil > > Phil Bone > Sr. Systems Consultant > NT Platform Services > Office: 706.596.5928 > Fax: 706.596.5950 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: preventing backup of large files
Hi, Another hint : If you have more than one machine, and you don't want to modify all the dsm.opt files, set a CLOPTSET option on the server and attach the concerned node to this CLOPTSET. Personnaly, I use this method to automatically exclude the "Temporary Internet Files" ... and so on... rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Lee, Gary D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 5 avril 2001 14:53 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : preventing backup of large files > > > Tsm server 3.7 on os/390, > client v4.1 windows nt. > > I have a need to prevent the backup of large "rendered" video > files. I > know that the best way to do this is through an incl/excl list and not > back up the directories where these should be stored. > However, this is > a student lab and the little darlings will probably find a > way to store > them in the "wrong" place. > > Is there a way to exclude from backup all files of size "x" > or greater? > > Thanks in advance. > > > Gary Lee > Senior Operating Systems Analyst > Ball State University > phone 765-285-1310 > >
Re: GUI on Solaris 8
Hi Chris, It seems to be a known bug, I encountered it with a 4.1.2.12 client on Solaris 2.8 running on a 3.1.2.90 server. The common factor seems to be client 4.1.2 on Sol 8.0 I do not know any patch/fixes for the moment ! Has anyone got one ? rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Christoph Pilgram > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 5 avril 2001 14:29 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : GUI on Solaris 8 > > > Hy all, > > a collegue of mine has to install the TSM-Client for SUN-Solaris 8.0 . > Client OS-Level is Solaris 8, TSM-Client-Level is 4.1.2.12, > TSM-Server : AIX > 4.3.3, TSM 3.7.4 > > After installation the gui-client on the SUN runs fine if I > start it from an > X-window. > If I start it from CDE it opens the window only with icons > not with the > description of the icons and writes the following error-messages : > Warning : Name : FONTLIST_DEFAULT_TAG_STRING >CLASS : XmRendition >Conversion failed. Cannot load fonts. > Warning : No font found > > By clicking on one icon, the machine writes a core-dump. > > What to do, that dsm can find fonts on this client , or whats wrong ? > > Thanks for help > Christoph >
Re: RAID5 or 0+1
Hi Rich, If you can afford R0+1 cost, why not. IMHO, I prefer TSM-mirroring than AIX-mirroring. What kind of disks do you have. SAN-storage ? SSA drawer or "single" SCSI ones ? Your disks ares stressed during backups, it's quite normal, if you think your system is two heavily loaded, reduce the number of concurrent sessions or/and increase BUFPOOLSIZE rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 4 avril 2001 22:02 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : RAID5 or 0+1 > > > I have been seeing high memory utilization and high disk busy > problems on > the disks that my database sits on when I do backups. I'm > running AIX > 4.3.3 with in a H70 with 2 cpu's and 1gb of memory. I was thinking of > moving my tsm database to a RAID 0+1 setup from a RAID5 setup > to see if I > gain any performance. Does anyone have any suggestions on database > performance issuses. > > Thanks > ***EMAIL DISCLAIMER** > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be > confidential and are > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom they are > addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual > responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, any > disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or > omitted to be taken > in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this e-mail > in error, please delete it and notify the sender or contact Health > Information Management (312) 996-3941. >
Re: schedule refresh
adsm > upd sched domain_name sched_name startd=today startt=now dur=20 duru=m pri=1 ... startd(ate) startt(ime) dur(ation) duru(nits) = m(inutes) pri(ority) adsm > help upd sched (TSM HELP IS GREAT, DO NOT HESISTATE TO USE IT) rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Patrick Sheehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 4 avril 2001 17:10 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : schedule refresh > > > > Is there a way to refresh the schedule manually (console > command?) or a > setting to change to make the refresh shorter than 6 hours? > > > TIA > > Patrick > (Embedded image moved to file: pic15574.gif) >
Re: DLT 8000 / TSM problem
Hi Mike, Are you sure you are using the TSM DLT driver and not NT/Win2K one ? Your DLT8k firmware must be upgraded, see TSM 4.1.3 README.DEV file It has been tested w/ v22 Drive :Quantum DLT8000 F/W : 022B Rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Michael Hack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 4 avril 2001 14:28 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : DLT 8000 / TSM problem > > > Knows anyone this problem with DLT8000 and TSM 4.1.3.0 under NT? > > To label a tape works fine. > When TSM try to write data on the tape a undefined write error occurs > without any sense keys . > With the DLT7000 drives we have no problems. > > Environment: > > NT 4.0 SP5 > TSM 4.1.3.0 > > Drive firmware: > > STK DLT8000:V43 and V51 > Quantum DLT8000:V20 > > > Activity Log von TSM 4.1.3.0 > > 04/04/2001 11:01:37 ANR0984I Process 2 for MIGRATION started in the > BACKGROUND at 11:01:37. > 04/04/2001 11:01:37 ANR1000I Migration process 2 started > for storage pool > DISKPOOL. > 04/04/2001 11:01:38 ANR8326I 001: Mount DLT volume SCRTCH > R/W in drive > MT5.0.0.2 (MT5.0.0.2) of library DLTLIB1 within 60 minutes. > > 04/04/2001 11:01:42 ANR8328I 001: DLT volume BAND02 mounted in drive > MT5.0.0.2 (MT5.0.0.2). > 04/04/2001 11:01:42 ANR1340I Scratch volume BAND02 is now defined in > storage pool DLTPOOL. > 04/04/2001 11:01:42 ANR1411W Access mode for volume BAND02 > now set to > "read-only" due to write error. > 04/04/2001 11:01:47 ANR8360I Volume BAND02 has been deleted > from MANUAL > library DLTLIB1. > 04/04/2001 11:01:47 ANR1341I Scratch volume BAND02 has been > deleted from > storage pool DLTPOOL. > 04/04/2001 11:02:05 ANR8468I DLT volume BAND02 dismounted from drive > MT5.0.0.2 (MT5.0.0.2) in library DLTLIB1. > > Thanks > Michael >
Re: Big file is failing on HP-UX
This wonderfull option COMPRESSALWAYS does not work with 3.1 clients... > -Message d'origine- > De : Richard Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 4 avril 2001 11:55 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: Big file is failing on HP-UX > > > I've only just started to follow this discussion and I > haven't read any of > the previous replies. However I had the same problem about a > year ago - > when backing up tar and .Z files. > > I think the client backup session sends an estimate of the > space required > in a server storage pool. If you are trying to backup > already compressed > files using client compression then the file may grow and the > size estimate > is exceeded. An emergency extend of the "reserved space" is > attempted. > However if this is not possible, then you get the "server out of data > storage space" message. Have your tried COMPRESSALWAYS NO in > your option > file? This stops compressing the file if it starts to grow > during backup > > Richard Bates > Storage Specialist > ITS - SB - Enterprise Consultancy Services > == > Voice : +44 (0) 1926 462298 (Hicom : 662298) > IBM Mobile: +44 (0)775 386 8289 (Mobex : 270798) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ABDULSALAM ABDULLA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04-04-2001 06:01:33 > > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: Re: Big file is failing on HP-UX > > > You might be right about the size of that file, what about > this one, same > way failing while I have enough scratch tapes available. > I did try it again same day it went through with no problem. > Note: this > client is AIX 3 4 004000284C00 > > First Attempt > Executing scheduled command now. > 04/04/01 06:30:01 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN ITA-EXPORT 04/04/01 > 06:30:00 > 04/04/01 06:30:01 Incremental backup of volume '/u16/export/' > 04/04/01 06:30:02 Directory--> 1,024 > /u16/export [Sent] > 04/04/01 06:30:02 Normal File--> 1,186,771,767 > /u16/export/APRD.dmp.Z > ** > Unsuccessful ** > 04/04/01 06:49:53 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/u16/export/APRD.dmp.Z' > failed > 04/04/01 06:49:53 ANS1311E Server out of data storage space > > >>Next Attempt > Executing scheduled command now. > 04/04/01 08:22:33 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN ITA-EXPORT 04/04/01 > 08:20:20 > 04/04/01 08:22:34 Incremental backup of volume > '/u16/export/APRD.dmp.Z' > 04/04/01 08:22:35 Normal File--> 1,186,771,767 > /u16/export/APRD.dmp.Z > [Sen > t] > 04/04/01 08:43:26 Successful incremental backup of > '/u16/export/APRD.dmp.Z' > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hervé CHIBOIS [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 10:38 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Big file is failing on HP-UX > > > > Hi there, > > > > give us more details about your logs and apply latest PTF > 3.1.2.90 to > your > > server. > > 125 MB is not a big file ! > > > > what are the log messages (server-side and client side) ? > > > > dsmc > q backup -ina /your_parth/* ? > > > > rv > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "ABDULSALAM ABDULLA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 9:34 AM > > Subject: Big file is failing on HP-UX > > > > > > > Looks like [line6.tar] is failing, it's saying backup is > complete but > > the > > > file size for every version is Zero. Could it be the > size? How can I > > > resolve this problem? > > > I'm on 3.1.240 and Client is > > > # uname -a > > > HP-UX potline6 B.10.20 A 9000/809 67308342 two-user license > > > > > > Following files are getting created daily. > > > > > > # ls -l > > > total 411472 > > > drwxrwxrwx 5 root sys 11264 Apr 1 07:09 line5 > > > -rw-rw-rw- 1 root sys85084160 Apr 1 > 07:11 line5.tar > > > drwxrwxrwx 13 asouth users13312 Apr 1 06:22 line6 > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root sys125419520 Apr 1 > 06:24 line6.tar > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 8192 Jun 10 1996 > lost+found > > > > > > Thanks a lot, > > > Salam > > > > > >
Re: Message ANR4556W but log is ok
Yes got this one two ! Not seen in 4.1.3, try to read the README of 4.1.3 > -Message d'origine- > De : Brazner, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 4 avril 2001 00:47 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Message ANR4556W but log is ok > > > We are on TSM 4.1.2 on AIX 4.3.3. We only do full database > backups. They > are started either by command or are triggered. We're seeing > the following > behavior on the recovery log (rollforward). Often, after a > full database > backup completes, we'll get this message: "ANR4556W Attention: the > database backup operation did not free sufficient recovery > log space to > lower utilization below the database backup trigger. The > recovery log size > may need to be increased." A "query log", however, shows > util is down to > near zero (where I would expect it to be after a full backup > completes). > The ANR4556W message appears to be bogus. Has anyone else > observed this? > Also, is there a rule of thumb on what the log file size > should be based on > the size of the database? > > Bob Brazner > Johnson Controls, Inc. > (414) 524-2570 >
No Subject
Send us your sched definition and dsm.opt on the client rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Patrick Sheehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 3 avril 2001 18:10 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : > > > I've been trying to get a client to backup to the server via > schedules for > both a full and incremental backups. The backups work > manually but when I > schedule them it never finds anything to back up. Here's the > log output: > 4/02/2001 13:21:29 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN DAILY_INCR 04/02/2001 > 12:23:00 > 04/02/2001 13:21:33 Incremental backup of volume 'Z:\' > 04/02/2001 13:21:34 Successful incremental backup of '\\bgm2\z$\*' > > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Total number of objects inspected:5 > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Total number of objects backed up:0 > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Total number of objects updated: 0 > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Total number of objects rebound: 0 > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Total number of objects deleted: 0 > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Total number of objects expired: 0 > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Total number of objects failed: 0 > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Total number of bytes transferred:0 > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Data transfer time:0.00 sec > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Network data transfer rate:0.00 KB/sec > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Aggregate data transfer rate: 0.00 KB/sec > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Objects compressed by:0% > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Elapsed processing time: 00:00:07 > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END DAILY_INCR 04/02/2001 > 12:23:00 > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Scheduled event 'DAILY_INCR' completed > successfully. > 04/02/2001 13:21:36 Sending results for scheduled event 'DAILY_INCR'. > 04/02/2001 13:21:37 Results sent to server for scheduled event > 'DAILY_INCR'. > > How do I select an entire drive or directory for full and/or > incremental > backup. > > > > TIA > > Patrick >
Re: ADSM concern on Database size.
Hi Even if OS/390 is a robust OS, IMHO you have reached a critical size. You should think about splitting your TSM server. 44GB is the real size of the avail one ? Recovering time is mainly a question of I/O and CPU. Which kind of tape do you use ? Is your DB defragmented ? rv > -Message d'origine- > De : David Browne. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 3 avril 2001 17:14 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : ADSM concern on Database size. > > > One of our ADSM databases runs on OS/390 2.10 and is 44GB. > Does anybody have a recommendation for how big you should let > the database > get? > Does anyone have one on OS/390 that's much bigger? > Is there a limit on the size? > I'm concerned about the length of time it would take to recover. > Are there other considerations? >
Re: Tivoli would not start (AIX)
Hi ! Are your TSM drivers OK ? lsdev -Cc tape You should see rmtXXX and mtXXX and lbXXX all Available, if any is Defined, you have a pb with your drivers. If you can not start tsm and type the command given in the 'Wu Je' message, restart your TSM server with you library off; shutdown you lib, and check that there is no tape stuck in drives. then restart TSM with normal boot sequence rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Gunaseharan, Shekar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 3 avril 2001 16:17 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Tivoli would not start (AIX) > Importance : Haute > > > Dear ADSM members, > > We can not seem to start our TSM > >The error message follows: > > > > 04/02/01 11:44:49 ANR8358E Audit operation is > required for library >DLT_LIBRARY. > > 04/02/01 11:44:49 ANR8834E Library volume RAAS00 > is still present in library >DLT_LIBRARY drive DLT_DRIVE > (/dev/mt0), and must be >removed manually. > > 04/02/01 11:44:49 ANR8447E No drives are currently > available in library >DLT_LIBRARY. > > > > Does someone have any cluses/support ideas. > > > THANKX a milion > > Shekar > ICS, NJ >
Re: NT client errors
Hi Neil, #define DSM_RS_ABORT_DUPLICATE_OBJECT32 (dsmrc.h) Are you restoring NT over a running one ?, If yes, it is normal. 1) you should apply the latest Client PTF 4.1.1.16 or 4.1.2.12 2) usually, NT should be re-installed into a different dir \WINNT_TEMP with the TSM client. 3) You could then bare-restore your \WINNT dir structures without any acces pb. 4) for which file(s) do you have this message ? rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Poland, Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 3 avril 2001 15:44 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : NT client errors > > > TSM Server 4.1.2.0 on AIX 4.3.3 > > The problem is on a client running NT SP6a / tsm 4.1.0.0 > > We recently upgraded this server and updated the client. > Fresh install of > both NT and TSM, then restored the network drives. Since the > rebuild/restore > it's been acting shady. Has anyone seen this error? > > 04/02/2001 22:26:59 GetBackupStreamSize(): CreateFile(): > Win32 RC = 32. > 04/02/2001 22:26:59 TransWin32RC(): Win32 RC 32 from fioGetAttrib(): > GetBackupStreamInfo > > Thanks in advance for any assistance! > Neil >
Re: Windows Client Support of LTO drives
Yes it should, check the README stuff, > -Message d'origine- > De : Bruce Lowrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 2 avril 2001 20:30 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Windows Client Support of LTO drives > > > Does anyone have any information on when the Windows Client > will support > local LTO drives to perform Backup set restores? I was hoping > that 4.1.2.12 > had it but it does not > > Bruce E. Lowrie > Network Analyst > Global Information Technology Services > Storage, Output, Legacy > *E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Voice: ?(517) 496-6404 > *Post:Mail: CO2111, (DC2 1st Floor) > > > > > _ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by the > MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit > http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp >
Re: TSM
Hi Shekar, Format a new LOG vol with : % dsmfmt -log -m /.../log_new.dsm and type the following % DSMSERV EXTEND LOG /.../log_new?dsm Then you could restart your TSM server w/o any pb rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Gunaseharan, Shekar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 3 avril 2001 00:43 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : TSM > Importance : Haute > > > Hello Dear Experts, > we were running Unix (AIX) file systems backup using > TSM. It aborted > saying that recovery log needed space. We added space and > restarted it. TSM > started to do auditingapparently it was running for along > time(Friday evening) > and now TSM would not start.on Monday morning > (initialization failed on tape volume). > > Does any one have a clue and a possible answer > > > Thanks > > Shekar > ICS, NJ >
No Subject
Hello there, here are those I use, daily-incremental on disk weekly-full on tape Keep 8-days of db backups, rv /*/ /* */ /* SAVE_DB - weekday incremental to disk */ /* */ /*/ def scr save_db desc=' - backup db devc=file t=i' upd scr save_db "del volh todate=-8 type=dbb" upd scr save_db "backup db devc=fileclass type=inc" /*/ /* */ /* SAVE_DB_FULL - saturday Full to DLT tape */ /* */ /*/ def scr save_db_full desc=' - backup db devc=dltclass t=f' upd scr save_db_full "del volh todate=-8 type=dbb" upd scr save_db_full "backup db devc=dltclass type=full" > -Message d'origine- > De : Gunaseharan, Shekar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 2 avril 2001 23:17 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : > > > > Are there any proper ways to handle the tivoli db backup. Are there > > scripts > > someone can share with us. > > > > > > > -- > > > From: Remeta, Mark[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 1:26 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject:Re: Database Backup. > > > > > > Perform database backups on a daily basis. > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Rajesh Oak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 12:18 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Database Backup. > > > > > > > > > I need to change the settings for the Database Backup. > For small changes > > > to > > > the database I am getting messages to backup my database. > > > > > > ANR2121W ATTENTION: More than 37.9648 MB of the database > has changed and > > > the > > > last database backup was more than 24 hours ago. Use the BACKUP DB > > command > > > to provide for database recovery. > > > > > > How can I change this so that I do not keep getting this message > > > > > > > > > Get 250 color business cards for FREE! at Lycos Mail > > > http://mail.lycos.com/freemail/vistaprint_index.html > > > > > >
Re: NT Client - Out of Memory
Ok, Looks good, some remarks, TCPWindowsize set to 63 under NT does not enhance perf. NT is not RFC1323 compliant (that why you can not set it to 64) and works better if this param is set to 48. Of course, your TSM server is correctly set to handle these config. setting TNXBYTElimit to 2GB seems to me a little hazardous. It seems that you accepts sending up to 2GB of data before TSM commit the single transaction ? Humm... dangerous. Here are some 'best-practises' values if your TSM server is UNIX : 2048 if your TSM server is NT : 25600 Also check the MEMORYEFFICIENTBACKUP (see other message) rv > -Message d'origine- > De : David Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 2 avril 2001 17:57 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: NT Client - Out of Memory > > > Here are the significant parameters from the dsm.opt: > DOMAIN C: > DOMAIN D: > TCPSERVERADDRESS 172.20.0.7 > TXNBYTELIMIT 2097152 > TCPWINDOWSIZE 63 > TCPBUFFSIZE 32 > LARGECOMMBUFFERS NO > I don't think i have set or changed the resourceutilization' param. > Is that in the dsm.opt? > > This is an incremental. We had no problems running the first full > backup. The server is a single 400Mhz processor with 128MB of RAM. > > Thanks, > > --David Nash > Systems Administrator > The GSI Group > > - Original Message - > From: "Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:42 AM > Subject: Re: NT Client - Out of Memory > > > > Hi David, > > > > Close all the useless client applis and services on the NT box > > Have you changed the 'resourceutilization' param ? If yes, > set it to 1 > > in dsm.opt. What are your TCPxxx parameters and TNXBYTELIMIT ? > > > > How big is your server ? > > > > If it is the first time you backup this machine, try to send drives > > one by one, of huge-directories one by one. > > > > If this is a normal incrémental session, add some RAM ! > > > > rv > > > > > -Message d'origine- > > > De : David Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Envoyé : lundi 2 avril 2001 17:34 > > > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Objet : NT Client - Out of Memory > > > > > > > > > We are having a problem with an NT Client. We > > > are using 4.1.3 client and server. The NT Client > > > (NT Server 4.0 SP6a) is getting an error message > > > when we try to back it up. The error is ANS1030E, > > > which states "Out of memory...". Is there anything > > > I can do short of adding more memory or increasing > > > the pagefile? This server has a RAID5 partition that > > > contains about 100 GB of small files. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > --David Nash > > > Systems Administrator > > > The GSI Group > > > > > > > >
Re: NT Client - Out of Memory
Hi David, Close all the useless client applis and services on the NT box Have you changed the 'resourceutilization' param ? If yes, set it to 1 in dsm.opt. What are your TCPxxx parameters and TNXBYTELIMIT ? How big is your server ? If it is the first time you backup this machine, try to send drives one by one, of huge-directories one by one. If this is a normal incrémental session, add some RAM ! rv > -Message d'origine- > De : David Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 2 avril 2001 17:34 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : NT Client - Out of Memory > > > We are having a problem with an NT Client. We > are using 4.1.3 client and server. The NT Client > (NT Server 4.0 SP6a) is getting an error message > when we try to back it up. The error is ANS1030E, > which states "Out of memory...". Is there anything > I can do short of adding more memory or increasing > the pagefile? This server has a RAID5 partition that > contains about 100 GB of small files. > > Thanks, > > --David Nash > Systems Administrator > The GSI Group >
Re: ans4026w exceed max file size
Hi Y... Are you absolutely sure that the user which launchs the dsmc restore process has the right Ulimit params ? When do TSM throw this message, at the very end, at X% ? Give us more details. Do you have enough space in your FS ? rv > -Message d'origine- > De : YJPlane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 2 avril 2001 16:45 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : ans4026w exceed max file size > > > hi all > > running ADSM 3.1 level 2.50 server on aix 4.3.3, > sun client 3.1. level 08 on solaris 5.6, > linux client4.1 lecel 20 (latest) on red hat kernel 2.4.2 > > I'm trying to restore files from sun client on linux > vith option > -virtualnudename=sun. > everythings works fine BUT for large files (3.5 Go or grater) where i > get : > ANS4026W error processing '/toto/mimi.tgz' > size of '4,425,190,087' > exceeded maximum file size on your system. > > Of course, the linux system on which i restore DO > accept such file > size. Really such a big file exist on the destination filesystem. > > i'll be glad of ideas. > > thanks > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: Backup errors
Hi Goeffroy, Have you checked your policy set ? Seems your active one does not contain a valid CO for the MGMT class associated with /oracle obj. (inclexcl file) try 'val pol ' For your NFS Stale Pb, there is something wrong with your NFS conf, either server or client. Is your NFS server is heavily loaded of on a slow network ? Do you use a NFS caching system ? (which could be stale ) rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 30 mars 2001 16:36 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Backup errors > > > This is for all you UNIX folks out there. My UNIX admin is seeing the > following errors in some of the logs on nodes being backed up. Can you > please enlighten me on what these might be. As for the error with the > management class; it is set up properly, I have verified it > on my end there > is a backup copy group. > > Question on the stale NFS handle error; does this mean that > this file system > is just a mounted network drive on this machine and could > really be being > backed up somewhere else? I don't want to duplicate backups. > > Thanks for the help > > 03/26/01 00:07:47 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=171 from > fioGetDirEntries: / /oracle > 03/26/01 00:07:47 ANS4010E Error processing > '/oracle/admin': stale NFS > handle > 03/26/01 00:14:00 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'UNIX_SUNDAY' > failed. Return > code = 4. > 03/26/01 22:00:40 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=171 from > fioGetDirEntries: / /oracle > 03/26/01 22:00:40 ANS4010E Error processing '/': stale NFS handle > 03/26/01 22:04:35 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/usr/var/adm/syslog.dated/21-Mar-15:03' failed > 03/26/01 22:04:35 ANS1105E The management class for this > file does not > have a valid backup copy group. > This file will not be backed up. > > 03/26/01 22:04:35 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/usr/var/adm/syslog.dated/25-Mar-15:04' failed > 03/26/01 22:04:35 ANS1105E The management class for this > file does not > have a valid backup copy group. > This file will not be backed up. > > 03/26/01 22:04:35 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/usr/var/adm/syslog.dated/26-Mar-15:04' failed > 03/26/01 22:04:35 ANS1105E The management class for this > file does not > have a valid backup copy group. > This file will not be backed up. > > 03/26/01 22:04:35 ANS1228E Sending of object > '/usr/var/adm/syslog.dated/27-Mar-15:04' failed > 03/26/01 22:04:35 ANS1105E The management class for this > file does not > have a valid backup copy group. > This file will not be backed up. > > 03/26/01 22:07:59 ANS1802E Incremental backup of '/usr' > finished with 4 > failure > > 03/26/01 23:52:56 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=171 from > fioGetDirEntries: / /oracle > 03/26/01 23:52:56 ANS4010E Error processing > '/oracle/admin': stale NFS > handle > 03/26/01 23:56:53 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'UNIX_M-F' > failed. Return code > = 4. > > Geoff Gill > TSM Administrator > NT Systems Support Engineer > SAIC > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: (858) 826-4062 > Pager: (888) 997-9614 >
Re: TSM and EMC HighRoad
Celerra FS has poor network performance when backed-up. Don't know HighRoad stuff.. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Andreas Rensch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 30 mars 2001 16:05 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : TSM and EMC HighRoad > > > Hello, > > does anybody know problems concerning TSM 4.1 Server > (Solaris) and EMC's > HighRoad Software and Celerra FileServer? > > We are planning to implement such a solution but someone told > me that there > are problems with setting the archive bit. > > Tnaks for your help and a Happy Weekend > > mfg / regards > > andreas rensch / rz-qs > tel : +49(0)6171 66 3692 / fax : +49(0)6171 66 7500 3692 / > mobil : +49(0)172 > 6649 016 / mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Alte Leipziger Lebensversicherung aG - Alte Leipziger Platz 1 > - D 61440 > Oberursel - http://www.alte-leipziger.de > > Two rules for success in life. > 1. Don't tell people everything you know. > 2. >
Re: dbbackup tapes expiration
Hi Anton, 1) DB to see how many tapes are reserved for DB backup, type the following adsm > q volhistory type=dbb Then if you wnat to keep only the DB backup for a month, you can type adsm > del volh type=dbb todate=today-30 All the volumes (disk file if any, and tapes) will be free-ed, and tapes will return to scratch pool 2) cleaning Which version of TSM Are you running, on which platform I don't know if this library is cleaning-enabled with TSM. Depending on your TSM version and library, you could either : - let the lib do the cleans when needed. Clean tape must be in a specific slot - tell TSM that the slot X contains a cleaning tape - manually loads the cleaning tape into the drive and clean it (unlucky guy) Rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Anton Gubarkov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : vendredi 30 mars 2001 16:20 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : dbbackup tapes expiration > > > Dear colleagues, > > my tsm server is eating cartridges for db backup like an > elephant. I use only > full db backups (max db size is estimated to 6GB and I use > DLT IV tapes). Every > time I run dbbackup it picks up a new scratch cart. I have a > small library (IBM > 3502-r14 14 slots 2 DLT drives barcode reader) and I wonder > how I could make > best use of it for backup purposes. > > I also couldn't figure out how to check in the cleaning cart. > Every time I try > to checkin the cart manually I get the error: Library full. > When I use checkin > search=yes the cleaning cart is not seen, although it is seen > from library > control panel. And actually why I can't checkin volumes manually? > > Suppose I wan to do a massive client restore. (Some fool get > a virus and had his > HDD formatted). I have a lot of volumes in the overflow > location. I defined > collocation for DLT storage pool. Can I pre-checkin needed > volumes to the > library and then start restore? How? > > I hope these are not very big questions for you. > > Regards, > Anton Gubarkov. > Tel. +7 095 258 7626 > Fax +7 095 258 7650 >
Re: dsmerror.log messages
Hi when you install TSM client, check the API check-box to install API support files in C:\Program Files\TSM\api\include\dsmrc.h contains all the Return Codes used in TSM. Bye rv > -Message d'origine- > De : George Lesho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 28 mars 2001 22:20 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: dsmerror.log messages > > > How do you check an RC code or as you put it "check an API"??? > thanks > > George Lesho > Storage/System Admin > AFC Enterprises > > > > > > > "Chibois, Herve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/28/2001 08:21:41 AM > > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC) > Fax to: > Subject: Re: dsmerror.log messages > > > > Hi Don, > > check the API #define DSM_RC_REJECT_ID_UNKNOWN 53 > > Don't you have a postSched command that tries to connect w/ > an invalid user > ? > > rv > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : Don Matush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Envoy >
Re: Comparison of Backup Products
There's no need, NetBackup works great ! Try to contact the support instead ! rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Dave Canan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 28 mars 2001 18:10 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: Comparison of Backup Products > > > Is there a NetBackup List? Does anyone know how to subscribe? > > > At 03:23 PM 3/28/2001 +0200, you wrote: > >Hi Tim > > > >It's a pity you can not find some TSM gurus for your company. > >Usually, people talking on this list do ask the contrary. > >Wan't to migrate to NetBackup ?, ok, good luck see you on > >the NetBackup list, not ont this one. > > > >Rv > > > > > -Message d'origine- > > > De : Tim Melly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Envoyé : mercredi 28 mars 2001 15:14 > > > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Objet : Comparison of Backup Products > > > > > > > > > To All, > > > > > > Due to the poor quality *SM code Tivoli has been releasing, > > > and the resultant > > > fallout at my site, I've been asked to investigate other > > > backups solutions. I'm > > > familiar with Veritas NetBackup but have not worked with any > > > other backup > > > products. Does anyone have any experiences / information on > > > non-*SM products > > > that they can share. > > > > > > Thx, Tim Melly > > > Bayer Corp. > > > > > Money is not the root of all evil - full backups are. >
Re: dsmerror.log messages
Hi Don, check the API #define DSM_RC_REJECT_ID_UNKNOWN 53 Don't you have a postSched command that tries to connect w/ an invalid user ? rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Don Matush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 28 mars 2001 16:13 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : dsmerror.log messages > > > Server MVS TSM 4.1.3 > Client AIX 4.3 TSM 4.1.2 > > The backups run with out failure. Everything appears to be normal. > But I get the following messages in the dsmerror.log. There are no > error messages in the server activity log. > > 03/28/01 01:30:01 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; > result code: 53 > 03/28/01 01:30:52 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; > result code: 53 > > Has anyone seen these messages or know what I should do to correct the > problem. > > Thanks, > > Don ... >
Re: ARCHIVE: no error indication
what about the dsmerror.log ? > -Message d'origine- > De : Sergio Cherchyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 28 mars 2001 16:10 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : ARCHIVE: no error indication > > > Hi all! > > I've noticed an apparent annomaly in the archive command: > > I execute a dsmc archive of a certain number of files. In a > given point > the process find that one of these files doesn't exist. An > error message > appear: > > ANS1092E No files matching search criteria were found > ANS1803E Archive processing of '/TST5/archivelog' finished with > failures. > > However, there are no errored files indicated in the final report: > > Total number of objects inspected:5 > Total number of objects archived: 4 > Total number of objects updated: 0 > Total number of objects rebound: 0 > Total number of objects deleted: 0 > Total number of objects expired: 0 > Total number of objects failed: 0 > > Worse yet, the return code given at the end of this command is 0. I'm > executing this dsmc archive in a script that checks the RC after it to > see if something goes wrong. > > Wouldn't TSM send an error indication to inform about this > missing file? > > > > -- > > Sergio R. Cherchyk > Arquitectura Tecnológica - Midrange > Banco Río de la Plata S.A. - Grupo BSCH > Mire 480, 2do piso - 1036 Cap. Fed. > Argentina > Tel. (054)-11-4341-1643 > Fax. (054)-11-4341-1264 > >
Re: Comparison of Backup Products
Hi Tim It's a pity you can not find some TSM gurus for your company. Usually, people talking on this list do ask the contrary. Wan't to migrate to NetBackup ?, ok, good luck see you on the NetBackup list, not ont this one. Rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Tim Melly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 28 mars 2001 15:14 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Comparison of Backup Products > > > To All, > > Due to the poor quality *SM code Tivoli has been releasing, > and the resultant > fallout at my site, I've been asked to investigate other > backups solutions. I'm > familiar with Veritas NetBackup but have not worked with any > other backup > products. Does anyone have any experiences / information on > non-*SM products > that they can share. > > Thx, Tim Melly > Bayer Corp. >
Re: Counting objects
Hi there You could certainly find an undocumented command,... When you do a UNLOAD/LOAD or DUMP/LOAD DB, it reorganizes the objects and you could see how many items are stored in it. Attention this process could be VERY VERY long Rv -- ANR4039I LOADDB: Loaded 17217 database entries (cumulative). ... 2 hours for a 2.5 GB db DUMPED on a DLT7000 tape ... ANR4039I LOADDB: Loaded 37928032 database entries (cumulative). -- > -Message d'origine- > De : Fred Johanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 27 mars 2001 21:55 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Counting objects > > > Is there a formula for calculating the number of objects in the TSM > DB? OperatingSystem is AIX 4.3.3; TSM is 3.7.4. >
Re: SAN Datagateway with ADSM 3.1.2.50 on AIX 4.33 - Does it work ?
Hello, I think NO, the first TSM version that supports SAN stuff if the 3.7.3 (NT/2000, AIX) You should think about upgrading, at least apply the lastest patch 3.1.2.90 rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Michael Donabauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 22 mars 2001 09:37 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : SAN Datagateway with ADSM 3.1.2.50 on AIX 4.33 - Does it work? > > > Is ist possible to use a SAN Datagateway with an ADSM Server > 3.1.2.50 on AAIX 4.33? Are there any known problems? > > Thx in advance > Mike >
Re: TSM vs NSR Performance
Hi again, On UNIX machines, some parameters could be better tuned than on NT On the client dsm.opt TCPBUFFSIZE 32 TCPWINDOWSIZE 48 * could be set to 64 on UNIXEX (RFC1323) * Windows platforms are not compliant, => 63 max * 48 is the best choice for Windoze TXNBytelimit25600 * 2048 if UNIX TSM SRV, 25600 if NT TSM SRV > -Message d'origine- > De : Dirk Billerbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 15 mars 2001 16:34 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: TSM vs NSR Performance > > > Hello Stefano, > > performance tuning isn't easy but after what I have learned > there are some > parameters that can have a great impact on backup/restore performance: > > On the client side: > > - Increase the value for TXNBYTELIMIT (e.g. 25600 according > to the old ADSM > v3.1 performance tuning guide) > - Increase the value for RESOURCEUtilization to a value > 3 > (remember: no. > of data sessions = resourceutilization - 1, because there is > always one > control session) > - Set TCPBuffsize 31 (With TWO f !!!) > - Set TCPNodelay YES > - Set LOGMODE QUIET (For scheduled sessions) > - Set QUIET (For non-scheduled sessions) > - Set COMPRESSION No > > On the server side: > > - Increase the TCPWINDOWsize parameter to 63 (Important for the backup > performance) > - Set TCPBufsize 32 (With ONE f !!!) > - Use TCPNOdelay YES > - Set TXNGROUPMAX to 256 > - Set USELARGEBUFFERS to YES > > Good luck! > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > Met vriendelijke groeten, > With best regards, > Bien amicalement, > > CU/2, > Dirk Billerbeck > > > Dirk Billerbeck > GE CompuNet Kiel > Enterprise Computing Solutions > Am Jaegersberg 20, 24161 Altenholz (Kiel), Germany > Phone: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 117, Fax: +49 (0) 431 / 3609 - 190, > Internet: dirk.billerbeck @ gecits-eu.com > > > This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, > you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. > If you have received this mail in error, please tell us > immediately by return email and delete the document. > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 15.03.2001 15:41:53 > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To: mailbox.dekelnsm > cc: > Subject: TSM vs NSR Performance > > > > > > -- > > > > > Hi all, > > we are using TDP for SAP R/3 v3.1.0.4 for NT/Oracle, on a > client connected > to a TSM Server 4.1.2.0 (Windows NT) through a Gigabit > network. An online > backup of the whole DB (about 130 MB), directly to DLT tapes with two > sessions, lasts over 2 hours, that means about 60 GB/h. > > Before migrating to TSM, we were able to back up the same > database in about > 1 hour and 15 minutes (about 105 GB/h) using Legato NSR. > > I tried to change network parameters to improve the data > transfer rate, but > without success. So I tried to backup to disk storage pools > and I got a > poor 30 GB/h. > > Finally, I decided to define disk storage pools in EMC2 > storage disks, back > up directly to them, and I obtained about 107 GB/h! But my > customer doesn't > want to "waste EMC storage space for TSM storage pools", so > I'm looking for > an alternative solution... > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance, >Stefano Massi > >
Re: TSM vs NSR Performance
Hi Stefano, What do you prefer, a fast backup or a reliable one ? Some people say that TSM is the lowest backup solution on the market. You may find some sites where NSR or NBU is faster than TSM, but how many companies are no longer able to use their NSR backup system because it is over loaded ? In your case, you do not seem to have a huge amount of data (130 GB) for this client. Is your NT box is not powerfull enough, upgrade it ! rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Stefano Massi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 15 mars 2001 15:42 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : TSM vs NSR Performance > > > Hi all, > > we are using TDP for SAP R/3 v3.1.0.4 for NT/Oracle, on a > client connected > to a TSM Server 4.1.2.0 (Windows NT) through a Gigabit > network. An online > backup of the whole DB (about 130 MB), directly to DLT tapes with two > sessions, lasts over 2 hours, that means about 60 GB/h. > > Before migrating to TSM, we were able to back up the same > database in about > 1 hour and 15 minutes (about 105 GB/h) using Legato NSR. > > I tried to change network parameters to improve the data > transfer rate, but > without success. So I tried to backup to disk storage pools > and I got a > poor 30 GB/h. > > Finally, I decided to define disk storage pools in EMC2 > storage disks, back > up directly to them, and I obtained about 107 GB/h! But my > customer doesn't > want to "waste EMC storage space for TSM storage pools", so > I'm looking for > an alternative solution... > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance, >Stefano Massi >
Re: Problems with retrieve in TSM v.4
Hi Petr, If your TSM server is well sized, I'm afraid, you can't get this kind of request be faster. The GUI is slow and needs to completely query ALL the files of a tree-level before displaying it For really-big nodes, prefer the CLI. Is your TSM server heavily loaded when you retrieve your files ?, what is the cache hit %, if under 99%, increase BUFPOOLSIZE unless you pick this extra memory from the NT swap file. when you start a client session for retrieving files, have a look on your TSM server to the stats for your client node adsm > q node f=d will give you some hints about node workload for last session. rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Petr Prerost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 15 mars 2001 10:28 > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Problems with retrieve in TSM v.4 > > > Hello , > after upgrade TSM server to 4.1.2 ( NT ) there appear big performance > problems with retrieve . > TSM server is small ( DB is 2.5 GB ) but one of client > archives monthly NTFS > directory containing > about 200 000 files. When I tried to retrieve group of files with GUI > client - expand of each level > of directory structure take up to 15 minutes - I checked Q > sess on server > and session status > is RUN but no data goes between client and server ( this status don't > change ) . On the server > side I checked Q db f=d and I can see large number of buffer > requests ( more > than 4 millions ) and > cache hit ratio slowly decreasing ( I am using 200 MB db > cache ) . Well > after 15 minutes GUI show me > first level of archive files space and when I tried to expand > next level the > same story repeat . > > Any idea ? > > > Petr Pøerost > H.T.D., spol. s r.o. > Praha , Pod prùsekem 12 > Èeská republika/Czech republic > e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: ? on export/import using network attached file systems
Steve, when doing server2server operation, destination server MUST have a valid ARCHIVEPOOL with volumes ! Check this Have you checked the IBM Redbook, It's really helpfull, and your do not need a third server. I did not managed to do this stuff at the beginning and after having read the redbook, it works fine. send me your definitions of server-type node, and devclass Good luck rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Steve Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 15 mars 2001 00:03 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: ? on export/import using network attached file systems > > > Herve, > > Good idea but it does not seem to work. I can get all the > defs done and > start an export but it always fails with the errors shown below. > > I think I have an idea why it fails so let me explain. > > Server1 has a diskpool but no tapepools. I have server1 > diskpool migrate > to a virtual volumes in server2's diskpool. The server2 diskpool then > migrates to server2's tapepool, 3494 with two 3590e drives. This has > been working fine for months. > > Now I need to get the data off of server1 and into server2 as > native tsm > data which is why I am doing the export/import. When I start > the export > it has to open a session with server2 to get the data off of > the virtual > volumes and then send it back to the server2 diskpool as > export data. It > should work but does not. > > I have the same kind of problem trying to do reclaimation for the > server1 virtual volumes on server2. It would always fail with some > message indicating that the data was not available. I stopped doing > reclaimations and started using script created move data commands and > they work fine. > > I called tivoli one time about the reclaimation problem but > they didn't > have a clue what the problem might be. > > I just now setup a temporary tsm server called server3 and am doing a > export to it and then a import to server2 from server3. The export is > running now and looks like it will finish ok. Then I'll start > the import > and keep my fingers crossed. > > 031401 11:46:16 ANR8216W Error sending data on socket > 23. Reason > 32. > 031401 11:46:16 ANRD pvrserv.c(854): ServWrite: > Error writing > SERVER >volume W2KTAPE1_LOOPBK_TARGET.EXP.984598810. > rc=30 > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0662E EXPORT NODE: Output error > encountered in >accessing data storage. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0569I Object not processed for REDWOOD-O: > type=Backup, >file space=\\redwood\c$, > object=\ADSM.SYS\REGISTRY\REDWO- >OD\MACHINE\ SAM. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR1361I Output volume > W2KTAPE1_LOOPBK_TARGET.EXP.9845988- >10 closed. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR8216W Error sending data on socket > 23. Reason > 32. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0794E EXPORT NODE: Processing terminated > abnormally - >error accessing data storage. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0891I EXPORT NODE: Copied 3 optionset > definitions. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0626I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0627I EXPORT NODE: Copied 3 file space 0 > archive files, >13 backup files, and 0 space managed files. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0656W EXPORT NODE: Skipped 0 archive files, 1 > backup >files, and 0 space managed files. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0629I EXPORT NODE: Copied 16486 > bytes of data. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0611I EXPORT NODE started by XTSCSMB > as process > 241 has > ended. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0986I Process 241 for EXPORT NODE running in > the >BACKGROUND processed 20 items for a total of > 16,486 bytes >with a completion state of FAILURE at 11:46:16. > > > > "Chibois, Herve" wrote: > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > I did the trip last month for one of my customer. > > Do not need to export to a shared FS, you can directly > > try "Server-to-server" export. It works fine. > > The "key-step" (which I forgot to do the first time) is the > > "loopback" devclass. > > > > You can have a look at this piece of redbook : > SG245244.PDF, '4.11.2 page > > 130 > > > > Here is the steps I did for my customer. > > > > 1) export node from server1 to server2 (on a diskpool) > > 2) import node from server2 to server2 (that is the trick !) > > > > Good luck > > R
Re: S.O.S ADSM sunk !!
Hello Prasanna, Oups, looks like you are ine kernel-panic-mode ! 1) when your reinstall a server and want to restore the DB you need to REFORMAT it before. You can use only the db-an-log primary volumes. $ dsmserv format 2 log_primary.dsm log_addon.dsm 2 db_primary.dsm db_addon.dsm You SHOULD format 1 volume of each (db_addon log_addon) to give TSM some "working space" Then you can restore your DB $ dsmserv RESTOREDB devc=DLTCLASS volume=SP0169 2) when you manage to restore your DB, check if your db if in "ROLL-FORWARD" mode. It could be a reason why your log fills to quickly. Rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Ghanekar, Prasanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 14 mars 2001 17:43 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : S.O.S ADSM sunk !! > > > Being a novice, I'm seeking out the Expert ADSM community to > help me get > back my Flagship above water. > > Here's the snapshot of things: > ADSM Server running on WINNT 4 crashed due to Recovery Log crash. > Expire inventory schedule brought down the server as it > filled the recovery > log, asked for Tape, then filled one Tape and started asking > for another one > and there was no tape . Log kept on increasing and finally > took down the > server. > > Initially tried Restore Db but failed after starting a "Re-Do" on the > recovery log. > Also got the event id: 6 in the nt event log. about another > server being run > at the same time. > > Finally re-installed the server and applied last ptf > (3.1.2.90), server > tells me to use Upgrade DB to bring the database to most > current version. > Don't know when to use it ? > > Then, replaced the core four files with the original configuration and > issued Restore db (Point in time) command to get the database > back. Database > restore completes but when I issue: dsmservr command after > that, it says > ADSM server must be restored before it can be started. I > don't know when to > insert these files in the new installation. > > If I try to do a restore the database without using point in > time option, it > restores, begins server recovery, recovery log mount, starts > redo for the > log and fails at certain point. > > Need serious HELP to get the server back U > > Your Help is greatly appreciated.. > > Thanks for your time. > > Prasanna > > > Prasanna Ghanekar > <<...OLE_Obj...>> > EDS Pontiac East > 2100 S Opdyke Rd > MI 48341 > *: (248) 972-4547 >
Re: ? on export/import using network attached file systems
Hi Steve, I did the trip last month for one of my customer. Do not need to export to a shared FS, you can directly try "Server-to-server" export. It works fine. The "key-step" (which I forgot to do the first time) is the "loopback" devclass. You can have a look at this piece of redbook : SG245244.PDF, §4.11.2 page 130 Here is the steps I did for my customer. 1) export node from server1 to server2 (on a diskpool) 2) import node from server2 to server2 (that is the trick !) Good luck Rv -- CYBORG is an E20 running TSM 3.7 on AIX 4.3.2 GLADIATOR is a NT4 srv running TSM 4.1.2. It has to have a file-devclass pointing to your fileserver1 Source server = CYBORG Target server = GLADIATOR GLADIATOR> REGISTER NODE CYBORG_SRV ?***? DOMAIN=UNIVERS TYPE=SERVER GLADIATOR> DEF SERVER GLADIATOR_SRV HLA=127.0.0.1 LLA=1500 NODENAME=CYBORG_SRV PASS=?***? GLADIATOR> DEF DEV LOOPBACK DEVT=SERVER SERVERNAME=GLADIATOR_SRV MOUNRT=10 CYBORG> DEFINE SERVER gladiator_srv pass=?***? hla=172.16.45.5 lla=1570 nodename=cyborg_srv CYBORG> DEFINE DEVCLASS GLADCLASS devtype=server servername=gladiator_srv CYBORG> export node aigle filed=all devc=gladclass ANR0609I EXPORT NODE started as process 29. ANS8003I Process number 29 started. -- CONSOLE CYBORG [BEGIN] --- ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: EXPORT NODE aigle filed=all devc=gladclass ANR0984I Process 29 for EXPORT NODE started in the BACKGROUND at 11:30:00. ANR0609I EXPORT NODE started as process 29. ANR0402I Session 264 started for administrator ADMIN (Server) (Memory IPC). ANR8340I SERVER volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 mounted. ANR1360I Output volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 opened (sequence number 1). ANR0610I EXPORT NODE started by ADMIN as process 29. ANR0635I EXPORT NODE: Processing node AIGLE in domain UNIVERS. ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space \\aigle\c$ for node AIGLE. ANR1361I Output volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 closed. ANR0617I EXPORT NODE: Processing completed with status SUCCESS. ANR0626I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions. ANR0627I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 file space 0 archive files, 855 backup files, and 0 space managed files. ANR0629I EXPORT NODE: Copied 204264420 bytes of data. ANR0611I EXPORT NODE started by ADMIN as process 29 has ended. ANR4006I EXPORT NODE: Volume 1 written by process is GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000. ANR0568W Session 264 for admin ADMIN (Server) terminated - connection with client severed. ANR0986I Process 29 for EXPORT NODE running in the BACKGROUND processed 857 items for a total of 204,264,420 bytes with a completion state of SUCCESS at 11:31:36. -- CONSOLE CYBORG [END] - GLADIATOR> import node * filed=all devc=loopback volume=GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 ANR0609I IMPORT NODE started as process 29. ANS8003I Process number 29 started. -- CONSOLE GLADIATOR [BEGIN] --- ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: IMPORT NODE * filed=all devc=loopback volume=GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 ANR0984I Process 29 for IMPORT NODE started in the BACKGROUND at 11:35:26. ANR0609I IMPORT NODE started as process 29. ANR0402I Session 858 started for administrator ADMIN (Server) (Memory IPC). ANR0406I Session 860 started for node CYBORG_SRV (Windows NT) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(4136)). ANR8340I SERVER volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 mounted. ANR1363I Input volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 opened (sequence number 1). ANR0610I IMPORT NODE started by ADMIN as process 29. ANR0615I IMPORT NODE: Reading EXPORT NODE data from server CYBORG exported 2001-02-05 11:30:00. ANR0635I IMPORT NODE: Processing node AIGLE in domain UNIVERS. ANR2060I Node AIGLE registered in policy domain UNIVERS. ANR9961W Node entry AIGLE has not been added to this server's definition in Active Directory. ANR2099I Administrative userid AIGLE defined for OWNER access to node AIGLE. ANR0636I IMPORT NODE: Processing file space \\aigle\c$ for node AIGLE as filespace \\aigle\c$. ANR0617I IMPORT NODE: Processing completed with status SUCCESS. ANR0620I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 domain(s). ANR0621I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 policy sets. ANR0622I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 management classes. ANR0623I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 copy groups. ANR0624I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 schedules. ANR0625I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 administrators. ANR0891I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 optionset definitions. ANR0626I IMPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions. ANR0627I IMPORT NODE: Copied 1 file space 0 archive files, 855 backup files, and 0 space managed files. ANR0628I IMPORT NODE: Used 0 volume(s). ANR0629I IMPORT NODE: Copied 204264420 bytes of data. ANR1364I Input volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 closed. ANR0568W Session 858 for admin ADMIN (Server) terminated - conn
Re: Reporting Software
I've developped one in PHP and MySQL, will be soon posted I store node_occupancy, schedules_logs, db expiration_time, db and log used_pages in my MySQL db and creates charts and html tables for daily / Monthly reporting Here is a sample output rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Marc Levitan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 13 mars 2001 15:38 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Reporting Software > > > Has anyone used a TSM or third party Reporting software to > help with TSM > trending, forecasting, reporting, charting, etc??? > > I know there is Tivoli Decision Support, and CA Vantage TSM > Interface, and > others... > > Any recommendations would be great! > > Marc Levitan > Senior LAN Engineer > PFPC Global Fund Services > adsm.png
Re: exclude doesn't work
Hi Joost, open a dos session and type the following c:\dos > dsmc dsmc> q inclexcl this command show you which include/exclude rules TSM has undestood in your dsm.opt file is not ok, check the DSM_CONFIG env var then open the registry and check the parameter for 'TSM scheduler' service HLKM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\TSM Scheduler If the dsm.opt file used by the service is correct, then your rules in dsm.opt are not. Send me your dsm.opt Good luck rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Janse, JI (Joost) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mardi 13 mars 2001 10:58 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : FW: exclude doesn't work > > > > Hello, > > > > We're installing TSM4.1.1.16 on a Windows NT client (4.0 > SP6a). In the > > dsm.opt we added a few exclude statements according the guided > > recommandations. Using the GUI, the exclude works fine. > However, when we > > try to do a scheduled back-up (of course after stopping/starting the > > scheduler service) the exclude option isn't working at all. > Does this > > problem sound farmiliar to anyone of you, we're are probably doing > > something wrong but can't find the exact cause. I checked > the listserver > > for a solution but couldn't find anyone with the same issue. > > > > Hopefully there is someone who can point me in the right direction. > > > > Thanks in advance, Joost Janse > > Rabobank ICT. > > > De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en > is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht > onterecht ontvangt, wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en > de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. > > The information contained in this message may be confidential > and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you > receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents > herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. >
