DIS: Re: DIS: Dreams about nomic…
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Alex Smith wrote: > (Agora /should/ be > able to survive missing any single sentence from its ruleset, but > sometimes I'm not so sure…) A sort of scam-of-the-week contest, as it > were. Whoever chooses which sentence to disable would clearly have an > advantage, as they could think up the scams ahead of time. Depends on your definition of "survive". One scam I tried once, when I was patching a rule "honestly", was to delete a single 'not' which would have given the first person who realized it supreme power (side note: I was the assessor at the time; scam was spotted). -G.
DIS: Re: DIS: Re: DIS: Dreams about nomic…
--- On Sun, 7/4/13, Elliott Hird wrote: > I suggest we implement the form that was found in your dream: for > $currency, a player can suspend some part of a rule (for the whole > game or only as it relates to their actions?) for a while. > It sounds more interesting than a communal thing, and lord knows we > need some help getting an economy going. In the dream, it was only as it related to their own actions, but that sounds very difficult to correctly define. I guess we could just leave it vague and let CFJs sort it out. And yes, it definitely sounds interesting, that's why I mentioned it. -- ais523
DIS: Re: DIS: Dreams about nomic…
I suggest we implement the form that was found in your dream: for $currency, a player can suspend some part of a rule (for the whole game or only as it relates to their actions?) for a while. It sounds more interesting than a communal thing, and lord knows we need some help getting an economy going.
