DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the Stuffs: April 1st-7th edition
How would people feel about a rule that either: 1) Automatically takes newly created contents from a facility that a player owns or is contractually allowed to take from and is located on they same land that e is located at? 2) Players can designate some text as a command that they automatically do when new resources are created, treated as if they had sent that message to a public forum in the instant after the resources were created. Obviously there's a lot of room for issues of who's command executed first in both of these, but especially once all of us start having multiple facilities, it might become somewhat spammy to have threads claiming resources every week. On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Kenyon Prater wrote: > I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1). >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2
Aris was at (-1, -1) CB was at (+1, -1) I'm sorry I didn't publish reports. I probably should have. I knew people would get mad eventually because of my tardiness. But I figured more people would also get mad if I published anything in a report. Everyone would only get mad at everyone else because the rules surrounding Cartography were disputed and only recently patched. I'll hopefully be able to report soon. On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > Does anyone know where Aris and CB were when this happened? I’m trying to > update my report, but the cartogrophor’s report hasn’t been updated in a long > time. > > Gaelan > >> On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:37 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: >> >> I take everything from where I'm standing. >> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Aris Merchant < >> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I take everything from the mine where I'm standing. >>> >>> -Aris >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:17 PM Kenyon Prater >>> wrote: >>> If the orchard at (-1, 1) is nonempty I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1). On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following: > > Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1) > Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1) > > I likewise intend to respect EFDoA, and encourage everyone else to do >>> the > same. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Kenyon Prater > wrote: >> I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1). >> >> I intend to respect EFDoA and will hold off on claiming anything else > until >> 4 days has passed. > >>> > -- Trigon
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2
I was still at (-1, -1). -Aris On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 3:54 PM Gaelan Steele wrote: > Does anyone know where Aris and CB were when this happened? I’m trying to > update my report, but the cartogrophor’s report hasn’t been updated in a > long time. > > Gaelan > > > On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:37 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > > > I take everything from where I'm standing. > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Aris Merchant < > > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I take everything from the mine where I'm standing. > >> > >> -Aris > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:17 PM Kenyon Prater > >> wrote: > >> > >>> If the orchard at (-1, 1) is nonempty I take all the contents of the > >>> orchard at (-1, 1). > >>> > >>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Aris Merchant < > >>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following: > > Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1) > Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1) > > I likewise intend to respect EFDoA, and encourage everyone else to do > >> the > same. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Kenyon Prater > > wrote: > > I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1). > > > > I intend to respect EFDoA and will hold off on claiming anything else > until > > 4 days has passed. > > >>> > >> > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2
Does anyone know where Aris and CB were when this happened? I’m trying to update my report, but the cartogrophor’s report hasn’t been updated in a long time. Gaelan > On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:37 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > I take everything from where I'm standing. > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I take everything from the mine where I'm standing. >> >> -Aris >> >> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:17 PM Kenyon Prater >> wrote: >> >>> If the orchard at (-1, 1) is nonempty I take all the contents of the >>> orchard at (-1, 1). >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Aris Merchant < >>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following: Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0) Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1) Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1) I likewise intend to respect EFDoA, and encourage everyone else to do >> the same. -Aris On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Kenyon Prater wrote: > I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1). > > I intend to respect EFDoA and will hold off on claiming anything else until > 4 days has passed. >>> >>
DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2
If the orchard at (-1, 1) is nonempty I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1). On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following: > > Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1) > Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1) > > I likewise intend to respect EFDoA, and encourage everyone else to do the > same. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Kenyon Prater > wrote: > > I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1). > > > > I intend to respect EFDoA and will hold off on claiming anything else > until > > 4 days has passed. >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs
Preserved public facilities are supposed to help new and impoverished players get some starting resources even if they don't have their own facilities. Also to give all players an additional easy source of income. Unpreserved public facilites are basically no man's land where this kind of stuff is completely allowed. El 4 mar. 2018 19:19, "Kenyon Prater" escribió: > I'd be willing to just contract it to a redistribution contract or just > transfer it to people or something. I agree it's pretty unfair. What was > the goal of the public facilities? Maybe we need to redo them to better > achieve that goal > > On Mar 4, 2018 6:03 PM, "Aris Merchant" gmail.com> > wrote: > > Sigh. We really need to do something to make the distribution of > assets fair again. I mean, we can't take everything away, because > there's no rule violation involved, but we could at least even it out > a bit. The asset distribution is so unfair at the moment that I'm > worried about the long term impact. Opinions? > > -Aris > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:55 PM Kenyon Prater > wrote: > > > > If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following: > > > > Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0) > > Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1) > > Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1) > > Destroy 1 apple to move to (0, -1) > > Destroy 1 apple to move to (1, -1) > > Take all the contents of the farm at (1, -1) > > Destroy two apples to move to (1, 0) > > Destroy one apple to move to (1, 1) > > Take all the contents of the mine at (1, 1) > > Destroy one apple to move to (0, 1) > > Destroy one apple to move to (-1, 1) > > Take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1) >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs
I'd be willing to just contract it to a redistribution contract or just transfer it to people or something. I agree it's pretty unfair. What was the goal of the public facilities? Maybe we need to redo them to better achieve that goal On Mar 4, 2018 6:03 PM, "Aris Merchant" wrote: Sigh. We really need to do something to make the distribution of assets fair again. I mean, we can't take everything away, because there's no rule violation involved, but we could at least even it out a bit. The asset distribution is so unfair at the moment that I'm worried about the long term impact. Opinions? -Aris On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:55 PM Kenyon Prater wrote: > > If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following: > > Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1) > Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (0, -1) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (1, -1) > Take all the contents of the farm at (1, -1) > Destroy two apples to move to (1, 0) > Destroy one apple to move to (1, 1) > Take all the contents of the mine at (1, 1) > Destroy one apple to move to (0, 1) > Destroy one apple to move to (-1, 1) > Take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1)
DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs
Sigh. We really need to do something to make the distribution of assets fair again. I mean, we can't take everything away, because there's no rule violation involved, but we could at least even it out a bit. The asset distribution is so unfair at the moment that I'm worried about the long term impact. Opinions? -Aris On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:55 PM Kenyon Prater wrote: > > If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following: > > Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1) > Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (0, -1) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (1, -1) > Take all the contents of the farm at (1, -1) > Destroy two apples to move to (1, 0) > Destroy one apple to move to (1, 1) > Take all the contents of the mine at (1, 1) > Destroy one apple to move to (0, 1) > Destroy one apple to move to (-1, 1) > Take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1)