Re: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system....
fcntl(0, F_GETFD) = 0 >> 11484/2:getpid()= 11484 >> [11483] >> 11487: fcntl(1, F_GETFD) = 0 >> 11484/2:write(10, 0x100147A64, 130) = 130 >> 11484/2: T u e M a r 2 2 1 5 : 4 4 : 5 4 . 0 4 9 9 5 3 7 3 0 >> 2 0 >> 11484/2: 2 2 : p i d 1 1 4 8 4 : t h d - 1 0 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 : >> a m >> 11484/2: r e c o v e r : s t r e a m _ c l i e n t : C o u l d >> n o >> 11484/2: t b i n d t o p o r t i n r a n g e 5 1 2 - 1 >> 0 2 3 >> 11484/2: .\n >> 11487: fcntl(2, F_GETFD) = 0 >> 11484/2:getpid()= 11484 >> [11483] >> 11487: close(3)= 0 >> 11484/2:write(10, 0x100147A64, 185) = 185 >> 11484/2: T u e M a r 2 2 1 5 : 4 4 : 5 4 . 0 5 0 0 8 5 5 1 0 >> 2 0 >> 11484/2: 2 2 : p i d 1 1 4 8 4 : t h d - 1 0 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 : >> a m >> 11484/2: r e c o v e r : s e c u r i t y _ s e t e r r o r ( h a >> n d l >> 11484/2: e = 1 0 0 1 5 6 4 0 0 , d r i v e r = f f f f f f f f 7 >> 1 3 9 >> 11484/2: 2 f 4 0 ( B S D T C P ) e r r o r = s e n d m s g f >> a i l >> 11484/2: e d A : M e s s a g e t o o l o n g\n )\n >> >> >> -Ursprungligt meddelande- >> Från: Chris Hassell >> Skickat: den 21 mars 2022 20:37 >> Till: li...@xunil.at; ? amanda users ; Gunnarsson, >> Gunnar >> Ämne: RE: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system >> >> NOTE: it seems at least gcc 7 is a good idea for the Solaris build. >> Autoconf 2.69 >> seems to be the minimal level. >> >> To start from a clean set of source. >> >> % git clean -dfx >> % ./autogen >> >> ( Not sure if autogen is necessary any more. It can be done automatically >> in the >> scripts. ) >> >> To build binaries and packages in the top directory (where the source is) ... >> depending what you are running on. [Same dir setup as old]. >> >> % ./packaging/rpm/build client >> % ./packaging/deb/build client >> % ./packaging/sun-pkg/build client >> >> To build current working dirs in a subdirectory (rpmbuild, debbuild or >> pkgbuild) >> and keep the top clear. >> >> % ./packaging/rpm/buildpkg client >> % ./packaging/rpm/buildpkg client >> % ./packaging/sun-pkg/buildpkg client >> >> The Solaris 11 wasn't fully going until today when I adjusted where the >> license is >> installed. >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Stefan G. Weichinger >>> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 3:31 AM >>> To: Chris Hassell ; ? amanda users >> us...@amanda.org> >>> Subject: Re: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system >>> >>> WARNING: This email originated from outside of BETSOL. Do not click >>> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the >> content is safe. >>> >>> >>>> Am 17.03.22 um 22:28 schrieb Chris Hassell: >>>>> First of many. It is not configured-and-tested as is but it is very >>>>> close to our working version. >>>>> >>>>> -Versioning based on tags from git >>>>> >>>>> -An in-directory build as well as below-directory package build >>>>> >>>>> -Solaris 10 and Solaris 11 packages >>>>> >>>>> -Better handling of pre/post scripts (may need to update Debian >>>>> ones??) >>>>> >>>>> -Systemd services are included as well. >>>>> >>>>> If I can get someone to look over it and give it a spin I’d really >>>>> appreciate it. >>>>> >>>>> I have more fixes for the installcheck directory to allow some good >>>>> and solid self-tests. >>> >>> Nice to see progress. >>> >>> I assume you want us to try to build the code in that PR? >>> >>> pls point to some howto, I can't remember the procedure anymore (autoconf? >>> etc) >>> >>> I can test on Debian 11, for example. >> Confidentiality Notice | The information transmitted by this email is >> intended >> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. This email may >> contain >> proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are >> not the >> intended recipient of this message, be aware that any use, review, re- >> transmission, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance >> upon this >> message is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please >> contact the >> sender and delete the material from all computers. > Confidentiality Notice | The information transmitted by this email is > intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. This email > may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If > you are not the intended recipient of this message, be aware that any use, > review, re-transmission, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in > reliance upon this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this in > error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.
RE: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system....
.\n > 11487: fcntl(2, F_GETFD) = 0 > 11484/2:getpid()= 11484 > [11483] > 11487: close(3)= 0 > 11484/2:write(10, 0x100147A64, 185) = 185 > 11484/2: T u e M a r 2 2 1 5 : 4 4 : 5 4 . 0 5 0 0 8 5 5 1 0 > 2 0 > 11484/2: 2 2 : p i d 1 1 4 8 4 : t h d - 1 0 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 : > a m > 11484/2: r e c o v e r : s e c u r i t y _ s e t e r r o r ( h a > n d l > 11484/2: e = 1 0 0 1 5 6 4 0 0 , d r i v e r = f f f f f f f f 7 > 1 3 9 > 11484/2: 2 f 4 0 ( B S D T C P ) e r r o r = s e n d m s g f > a i l > 11484/2: e d A : M e s s a g e t o o l o n g\n )\n > > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: Chris Hassell > Skickat: den 21 mars 2022 20:37 > Till: li...@xunil.at; ? amanda users ; Gunnarsson, > Gunnar > Ämne: RE: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system > > NOTE: it seems at least gcc 7 is a good idea for the Solaris build. > Autoconf 2.69 > seems to be the minimal level. > > To start from a clean set of source. > > % git clean -dfx > % ./autogen > > ( Not sure if autogen is necessary any more. It can be done automatically > in the > scripts. ) > > To build binaries and packages in the top directory (where the source is) ... > depending what you are running on. [Same dir setup as old]. > > % ./packaging/rpm/build client > % ./packaging/deb/build client > % ./packaging/sun-pkg/build client > > To build current working dirs in a subdirectory (rpmbuild, debbuild or > pkgbuild) > and keep the top clear. > > % ./packaging/rpm/buildpkg client > % ./packaging/rpm/buildpkg client > % ./packaging/sun-pkg/buildpkg client > > The Solaris 11 wasn't fully going until today when I adjusted where the > license is > installed. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stefan G. Weichinger > > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 3:31 AM > > To: Chris Hassell ; ? amanda users > us...@amanda.org> > > Subject: Re: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system > > > > WARNING: This email originated from outside of BETSOL. Do not click > > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > > > > > Am 17.03.22 um 22:28 schrieb Chris Hassell: > > > First of many. It is not configured-and-tested as is but it is very > > > close to our working version. > > > > > > -Versioning based on tags from git > > > > > > -An in-directory build as well as below-directory package build > > > > > > -Solaris 10 and Solaris 11 packages > > > > > > -Better handling of pre/post scripts (may need to update Debian > > > ones??) > > > > > > -Systemd services are included as well. > > > > > > If I can get someone to look over it and give it a spin I’d really > > > appreciate it. > > > > > > I have more fixes for the installcheck directory to allow some good > > > and solid self-tests. > > > > Nice to see progress. > > > > I assume you want us to try to build the code in that PR? > > > > pls point to some howto, I can't remember the procedure anymore (autoconf? > > etc) > > > > I can test on Debian 11, for example. > Confidentiality Notice | The information transmitted by this email is intended > only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. This email may contain > proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not > the > intended recipient of this message, be aware that any use, review, re- > transmission, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon > this > message is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact > the > sender and delete the material from all computers. Confidentiality Notice | The information transmitted by this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. This email may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be aware that any use, review, re-transmission, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.
RE: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system....
Info for Solaris in specific …. The Solaris 10 build needs a lot of downloads from "pkgutil", but folks may be used to these distributed packages. SUNWgcc SUNWhea SUNWlibstdcxx4 SUNWarc SUNWzlib SUNWlibm SUNWcsu SUNWlxml SUNWgnu-gettext SUNWgnome-common-devel SUNWgnome-common-devel-share SUNWgnome-base-libs SUNWgnome-base-libs-devel SUNWgnome-base-libs-devel-share SUNWlxsl SUNWgmake SUNWopenssl-include SUNWgnutls-devel SUNWlibgcrypt-devel SUNWsmbac SUNWsmbau CSWlibtool CSWgmake CSWflex CSWbison CSWautoconf CSWautomake CSWcurl CSWlibcurl-dev CSWlibssl1-0-0 CSWlibncurses5 CSWlibreadline_dev CSWdocbooksxsl CSWlibxsl CSWfakeroot CSWgit CSWlibtool CSWswig CSWgnuplot CSWmtx CSWpkgutil CSWbash CSWggrep CSWgsed Solaris 11 requires (from a while ago??) at least these using “pkg install” (maybe more likely to be installed already) and their depends: gcc-c gnu-binutils gnu-gettext gnu-make gnu-m4 gnu-tar libtool autoconf automake bison flex swig glib2 json-glib readline curl openssl ncurses perl-common mtx libsmbclient gnuplot CSWcoreutils CSWfindutils CSWbash CSWfakeroot CSWgmake I haven’t de-installed everything CSW from Solaris 11, as their “pkgs” repos have become much stronger over the last two years. I’m pretty sure most of the above is correct.. at least to use fakeroot. > -Original Message- > From: Stefan G. Weichinger > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 3:31 AM > To: Chris Hassell ; ? amanda users us...@amanda.org> > Subject: Re: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system > > WARNING: This email originated from outside of BETSOL. Do not click links or > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Am 17.03.22 um 22:28 schrieb Chris Hassell: > > First of many. It is not configured-and-tested as is but it is very > > close to our working version. > > > > -Versioning based on tags from git > > > > -An in-directory build as well as below-directory package build > > > > -Solaris 10 and Solaris 11 packages > > > > -Better handling of pre/post scripts (may need to update Debian > > ones??) > > > > -Systemd services are included as well. > > > > If I can get someone to look over it and give it a spin I’d really > > appreciate it. > > > > I have more fixes for the installcheck directory to allow some good > > and solid self-tests. > > Nice to see progress. > > I assume you want us to try to build the code in that PR? > > pls point to some howto, I can't remember the procedure anymore (autoconf? > etc) > > I can test on Debian 11, for example. Confidentiality Notice | The information transmitted by this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. This email may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be aware that any use, review, re-transmission, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.
RE: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system....
NOTE: it seems at least gcc 7 is a good idea for the Solaris build. Autoconf 2.69 seems to be the minimal level. To start from a clean set of source. % git clean -dfx % ./autogen ( Not sure if autogen is necessary any more. It can be done automatically in the scripts. ) To build binaries and packages in the top directory (where the source is) ... depending what you are running on. [Same dir setup as old]. % ./packaging/rpm/build client % ./packaging/deb/build client % ./packaging/sun-pkg/build client To build current working dirs in a subdirectory (rpmbuild, debbuild or pkgbuild) and keep the top clear. % ./packaging/rpm/buildpkg client % ./packaging/rpm/buildpkg client % ./packaging/sun-pkg/buildpkg client The Solaris 11 wasn't fully going until today when I adjusted where the license is installed. > -Original Message- > From: Stefan G. Weichinger > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 3:31 AM > To: Chris Hassell ; ? amanda users us...@amanda.org> > Subject: Re: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system > > WARNING: This email originated from outside of BETSOL. Do not click links or > open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Am 17.03.22 um 22:28 schrieb Chris Hassell: > > First of many. It is not configured-and-tested as is but it is very > > close to our working version. > > > > -Versioning based on tags from git > > > > -An in-directory build as well as below-directory package build > > > > -Solaris 10 and Solaris 11 packages > > > > -Better handling of pre/post scripts (may need to update Debian > > ones??) > > > > -Systemd services are included as well. > > > > If I can get someone to look over it and give it a spin I’d really > > appreciate it. > > > > I have more fixes for the installcheck directory to allow some good > > and solid self-tests. > > Nice to see progress. > > I assume you want us to try to build the code in that PR? > > pls point to some howto, I can't remember the procedure anymore (autoconf? > etc) > > I can test on Debian 11, for example. Confidentiality Notice | The information transmitted by this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. This email may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, be aware that any use, review, re-transmission, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.
Re: Sent out a pull-request to upgrade the packaging system....
Am 17.03.22 um 22:28 schrieb Chris Hassell: First of many. It is not configured-and-tested as is but it is very close to our working version. -Versioning based on tags from git -An in-directory build as well as below-directory package build -Solaris 10 and Solaris 11 packages -Better handling of pre/post scripts (may need to update Debian ones??) -Systemd services are included as well. If I can get someone to look over it and give it a spin I’d really appreciate it. I have more fixes for the installcheck directory to allow some good and solid self-tests. Nice to see progress. I assume you want us to try to build the code in that PR? pls point to some howto, I can't remember the procedure anymore (autoconf? etc) I can test on Debian 11, for example.