Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects

2022-02-08 Thread Alex Deucher
Applied the series.  Thanks!

Alex

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:33 AM Christian König  wrote:
>
> I think so, Alex will probably pick that up.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
> Am 08.02.22 um 09:28 schrieb zhanglianjie:
> > I am very sorry that I submitted many times due to the character
> > coding problem. Can PATCH V4 be used?
> >
> >> I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?
> >>
> >> That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is
> >> going wrong here :)
> >>
> >> Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >> Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
> >>> after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call
> >>> radeon_bo_kunmap before the function returns.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie 
> >>> Reviewed-by: Christian König 
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> >>> index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> >>> @@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct
> >>> radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
> >>>   handle = msg[2];
> >>>
> >>>   if (handle == 0) {
> >>> +radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
> >>>   DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
> >>>   return -EINVAL;
> >>>   }
> >>> @@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct
> >>> radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
> >>>   return 0;
> >>>
> >>>   default:
> >>> -
> >>>   DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
> >>> -return -EINVAL;
> >>>   }
> >>>
> >>> -BUG();
> >>> +radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
> >>>   return -EINVAL;
> >>>   }
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 2.20.1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>


Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects

2022-02-08 Thread zhanglianjie
I am very sorry that I submitted many times due to the character coding 
problem. Can PATCH V4 be used?



I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?

That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is going 
wrong here :)


Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call radeon_bo_kunmap 
before the function returns.


Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie 
Reviewed-by: Christian König 

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c

index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct 
radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,

  handle = msg[2];

  if (handle == 0) {
+    radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
  DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
  return -EINVAL;
  }
@@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct 
radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,

  return 0;

  default:
-
  DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
-    return -EINVAL;
  }

-    BUG();
+    radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
  return -EINVAL;
  }

--
2.20.1












Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects

2022-02-08 Thread zhanglianjie

Thank you very much for your review.


I think so, Alex will probably pick that up.

Thanks,
Christian.

Am 08.02.22 um 09:28 schrieb zhanglianjie:
I am very sorry that I submitted many times due to the character 
coding problem. Can PATCH V4 be used?



I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?

That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is 
going wrong here :)


Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call 
radeon_bo_kunmap before the function returns.


Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie 
Reviewed-by: Christian König 

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c

index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct 
radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,

  handle = msg[2];

  if (handle == 0) {
+    radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
  DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
  return -EINVAL;
  }
@@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct 
radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,

  return 0;

  default:
-
  DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
-    return -EINVAL;
  }

-    BUG();
+    radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
  return -EINVAL;
  }

--
2.20.1



















Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects

2022-02-08 Thread Christian König

I think so, Alex will probably pick that up.

Thanks,
Christian.

Am 08.02.22 um 09:28 schrieb zhanglianjie:
I am very sorry that I submitted many times due to the character 
coding problem. Can PATCH V4 be used?



I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?

That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is 
going wrong here :)


Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call 
radeon_bo_kunmap before the function returns.


Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie 
Reviewed-by: Christian König 

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c

index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct 
radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,

  handle = msg[2];

  if (handle == 0) {
+    radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
  DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
  return -EINVAL;
  }
@@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct 
radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,

  return 0;

  default:
-
  DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
-    return -EINVAL;
  }

-    BUG();
+    radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
  return -EINVAL;
  }

--
2.20.1














[PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects

2022-02-08 Thread zhanglianjie
after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call radeon_bo_kunmap before 
the function returns.

Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie 
Reviewed-by: Christian König 

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, 
struct radeon_bo *bo,
handle = msg[2];

if (handle == 0) {
+   radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, 
struct radeon_bo *bo,
return 0;

default:
-
DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
-   return -EINVAL;
}

-   BUG();
+   radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
return -EINVAL;
 }

--
2.20.1





Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects

2022-02-08 Thread Christian König

I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?

That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is going 
wrong here :)


Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:

after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call radeon_bo_kunmap before 
the function returns.

Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie 
Reviewed-by: Christian König 

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, 
struct radeon_bo *bo,
handle = msg[2];

if (handle == 0) {
+   radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, 
struct radeon_bo *bo,
return 0;

default:
-
DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
-   return -EINVAL;
}

-   BUG();
+   radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
return -EINVAL;
  }

--
2.20.1